-
nbennyboy said...
Rather disappointing that the most dominant team over the past few years will not go a home and home with a second tier Big Ten team. Anyplace anytime, come on bama.
I get the whole neutral site game, ND does it as well, but what is the harm in a home and home. Bama's not scared but I do think you would have your hands full up at Camp Randle at night. Would be a great game, power O verse power D.
airharper ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
4439 votes total - Redshirt
- (3360)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
airharper said...
It's probably about money. Bama would make more money off a one time neutral site game than by having to make a trip to Wisconsin. Bama budgets for a certain amount of home games. Now obviously, Alabama is flush with cash and others would probably argue that they have plenty of money and can afford to play Wisconsin home and away. But I'm guessing that the finances of one neutral site game vs. a home and away series would be the reason given. Alabama may make almost as much money playing Western Kentucky at home as they will playing Wisconsin, even after giving Western a paycheck. Then Alabama would have had the expense of traveling to Wisconsin. On the other hand, a neutral site game in Dallas could be a nice payday for both schools.
This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 7/8/2012 at 12:39 PM
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2272 votes total - Letterman
- (2379)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
RollTideSEC
- 3 stars Rating: 60
10 votes total - Participant
- (15)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 17 | 18 | 19 | Refresh



Alabama refuses to play home and home with Wisconsin