-
CliftonHokie09 said...
The point is that a product you endorse is behind a lot of the violence in these mass shootings. Taking away these guns is not going to hinder your freedom or your security because there are other alternatives. It is only going to affect your want. That's a shame because you are not the problem. It's people who are abusing the product to hurt others that are the problem. But the product is the only thing we can predict/control in the situation and so we need to take action is limit the destruction other individuals may cause with those types of guns.
azvalleybuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 80
11438 votes total - uwish -_^uknew
- All Conference
- (14230)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
rollingtide2004 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
12264 votes total - Roll Tide Roll
- All Conference
- (10348)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
azvalleybuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 80
11438 votes total - uwish -_^uknew
- All Conference
- (14230)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CliftonHokie09
- 5 stars Rating: 81
392 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (637)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sf2k4
- 5 stars Rating: 85
3981 votes total - We Live It National Champs 15
- All Conference
- (10152)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
azvalleybuckeye said...
Damn near everything imaginable is inherently dangerous if used improperly. Once again, NONE of your arguments hold any weight.
Cars are dangerous if driven recklessly.
Tylenol is dangerous if you take too many.
Baseball bats are dangerous if you hit a living object.
Microwaves are dangerous if you put the wrong things in them.
Viagra is dangerous if your erection lasts longer than 4 hours.
CliftonHokie09
- 5 stars Rating: 81
392 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (637)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
getmyjive11
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6851 votes total - Starter
- (9815)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Marshall Nole
- 4 stars Rating: 68
969 votes total - Varsity
- (1492)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
getmyjive11
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6851 votes total - Starter
- (9815)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CliftonHokie09
- 5 stars Rating: 81
392 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (637)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
rollingtide2004 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
12264 votes total - Roll Tide Roll
- All Conference
- (10348)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CliftonHokie09 said...
Here's another question. Why does it have to be concealed? Wouldn't you want a perpetrator to know you have a gun so he stays away? I know its the law, so it was more of a rhetorical question, but why not have some of identifier, like an article of clothing, that indicates you are carrying? If the NRA came up with a universal "uniform" then you probably would have a greater effect as people would act differently around those who are carrying. Everyone acts differently around police officers and I would expect if you are wearing something that identifies you as an individual with a gun, then I'd expect you'd see less crimes in areas you are, negating the need to even use the gun.
Marshall Nole
- 4 stars Rating: 68
969 votes total - Varsity
- (1492)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CliftonHokie09 said...
Here's another question. Why does it have to be concealed? Wouldn't you want a perpetrator to know you have a gun so he stays away? I know its the law, so it was more of a rhetorical question, but why not have some of identifier, like an article of clothing, that indicates you are carrying? If the NRA came up with a universal "uniform" then you probably would have a greater effect as people would act differently around those who are carrying. Everyone acts differently around police officers and I would expect if you are wearing something that identifies you as an individual with a gun, then I'd expect you'd see less crimes in areas you are, negating the need to even use the gun.
ROLL TIDE!
rollingtide2004 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
12264 votes total - Roll Tide Roll
- All Conference
- (10348)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Marshall Nole
- 4 stars Rating: 68
969 votes total - Varsity
- (1492)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Marshall Nole said...
go f-ck yourself. This ultra liberal crap coming from someone whos fanbase defends pedofiles.
Crime is much lower in areas with high percentages of CCL. It ain't going anywhere. You MAY get an assault weapons ban reintroduced if you are lucky, but you will never get the right to carry concealed taken away. Drop that pipedream.
CliftonHokie09
- 5 stars Rating: 81
392 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (637)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Marshall Nole said...
go f-ck yourself. This ultra liberal crap coming from someone whos fanbase defends pedofiles.
Crime is much lower in areas with high percentages of CCL. It ain't going anywhere. You MAY get an assault weapons ban reintroduced if you are lucky, but you will never get the right to carry concealed taken away. Drop that pipedream.
getmyjive11
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6851 votes total - Starter
- (9815)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
azvalleybuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 80
11438 votes total - uwish -_^uknew
- All Conference
- (14230)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
azvalleybuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 80
11438 votes total - uwish -_^uknew
- All Conference
- (14230)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
azvalleybuckeye said...
How? Explain how me having a firearm is dangerous?
They are no more inherently dangerous than an automobile. I could run someone over just as easily as I could shoot someone.
My children could take my keys and go for a joy ride running people over or killing themselves JUST as easily as they could shoot someone or themselves.
Your argument is completely weightless to anyone not paranoid and uneducated about firearms.
CliftonHokie09
- 5 stars Rating: 81
392 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (637)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CliftonHokie09 said...
Because one is a weapon and the other isn't. A car can be used as a weapon, but it's sole purpose is for transportation. A gun is not used for an other purpose. If you want to use it for protection, hunting, etc. All of those functions define what a weapon can be used for. It's different than a knife or a baseball bat too because those serve another purpose. A knife is used to cut something in every day use and a baseball bat is used to hit a baseball. Both can be used as a weapon, but that is not their intended use.
azvalleybuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 80
11438 votes total - uwish -_^uknew
- All Conference
- (14230)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
getmyjive11
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6851 votes total - Starter
- (9815)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
getmyjive11
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6851 votes total - Starter
- (9815)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Weedline ●
- 4 stars Rating: 64
8907 votes total - Recon Team Alabama
- Starter
- (7114)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Weedline ●
- 4 stars Rating: 64
8907 votes total - Recon Team Alabama
- Starter
- (7114)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
rollingtide2004 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
12264 votes total - Roll Tide Roll
- All Conference
- (10348)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15







That's why I should be allowed to carry my pistol in a holster on my side, if I so choose.
Ban Everything. (Obviously not, but good read)