Online Now 2862

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2139
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2795
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Best team to get left out of the title game?

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    I'm sure Miami was better at the end of that year, but if we go by your logic than I guess 2002 USC should have taken Miami's spot in the title game Vs Ohio St in 2002, since USC was probably the best team in the country at the end of that year, nevermind the 2 early losses.

    Miami was undefeated that year and they didn't lose a game in almost 3 years, they were also favored by 12 points vs OSU in that title game. What are you talking about?

    jmsmooth33 ●

  • Aub '04 no question

    $50 bet with Rebels10 - Best of 3 Egg Bowls Results 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - **the $50 goes to others schools athletics dept**

    msudawg12

  • 2000 Miami Hurricanes is the correct answer

    Correction

    This post was edited by shortcbaseballa on 9/28/2012 at 4:08 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    shortcbaseballa ●

  • 01 Miami won the title.

    jmsmooth33 ●

  • shortcbaseballa said...

    2001 Miami Hurricanes is the correct answer

    huh

    zabba

  • shortcbaseballa said...

    2001 Miami Hurricanes is the correct answer

    That team won the NC. confused ?

    abs_da_don ●

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    Miami was undefeated that year and they didn't lose a game in almost 3 years, they were also favored by 12 points vs OSU in that title game. What are you talking about?

    I'm talking about the language of ridiculous, which is the language you used when saying Miami instead of Washington should have played in the title game vs OU in 2000, despite losing head to head vs Washington.

    NcaaAssassinG13 ●

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    Hmmmm

    Since 2000, the Pac10 & Utah are 38-23 (62%) vs the SEC, ACC,
    and the 2 Big East schools in the south = all the Southern AQ schools.

    BCS Picked
    1998-FSUe
    2000-FSUe
    2001-Nebraska
    2003-LSU and OU
    2006-Florida
    2007-LSU
    2008-Florida and OU
    2011-Alabama

    Same record at teams above, but not picked by BCS

    1998-Ohio St, Wisconsin, and UCLA
    2000-Washington
    2001-Oregon
    2003-USC
    2006-Michigan
    2007-USC, several others
    2008-USC, Texas
    2011-Oklahoma St, Stanford

    It's blatant, the bcs repeatedly picks the teams who play against the weakest teams
    (other Southern teams) when they have the same record as teams from the
    West Coast, which has been the strongest region since 2000.

    Hmmmm indeed

    This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 9/28/2012 at 3:55 PM

    NcaaAssassinG13 ●

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Good thing Matt Leinart didnt get rattled in his 1st start, which was across country in a hostile environment. Although, I guess it wouldnt have mattered since Auburn never crossed SC's 35 yard line.

    clap

    and auburn had those same great running backs in 03 as 04 . the ones i hear people crowing about in this thread...

    What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

    scinsc5 ●

  • Texas in 08.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Einstein

  • OrlandoBuckeye said...

    According to Vegas the following schools who did not play in the BCSCG would have been favored over both schools who did play..

    1998 Ohio State

    2000 Miami ( pick-em with FSU )

    2003 USC

    2008 USC

    The truth. The final contenders

    What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

    scinsc5 ●

  • scinsc5 said...

    and auburn had those same great running backs in 03 as 04 . the ones i hear people crowing about in this thread...

    Just think, that 2004 USC team could have had WR Mike Williams (It would have been his Jr year) and I think WR Steve Smith missed about 6 games with injury that year.

    Auburn could have had Bo Jackson at RB, and they still would have lost to USC in 2004.

    NcaaAssassinG13 ●

  • 2010 TCU.

    signature image

    Roflcopter118

  • 1998 Ohio st that team was stacked ....

    bucky34 ●

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Just think, that 2004 USC team could have had WR Mike Williams (It would have been his Jr year) and I think WR Steve Smith missed about 6 games with injury that year.

    Auburn could have had Bo Jackson at RB, and they still would have lost to USC in 2004.

    Amazing when you think that that 2004 USC team started the season against VTech, played them across the country....with a brand new offensive line. The only returning player on the line was Fred Matua; first time starting center, redshirt sophomore center, Ryan Kalil; RT pulled from the JC ranks, Deuce Latui - who never played with the team before, due to Winston Justice suspension for the year....first time starting together as a unit.

    First game, and USC beat Vtech by a greater margin than Auburn in the bowl game at the end of the season.

    USC would have killed Auburn, just as they shut them out the year before - with that cadillac and brown guy, and their QB.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports