-
Steve Wiltfong
- 5 stars Rating: 95
15603 votes total - Steve Wiltfong
- All American
- (18927)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
devidee ●
- 4 stars Rating: 71
13691 votes total - Starter
- (9835)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
callen05 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1891 votes total - Starter
- (6434)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EF_Wolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1478 votes total - Varsity
- (1550)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EF_Wolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1478 votes total - Varsity
- (1550)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
callen05 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1891 votes total - Starter
- (6434)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
devidee ●
- 4 stars Rating: 71
13691 votes total - Starter
- (9835)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
callen05 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1891 votes total - Starter
- (6434)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8601 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Steve Wiltfong
- 5 stars Rating: 95
15603 votes total - Steve Wiltfong
- All American
- (18927)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BennyG34
- 5 stars Rating: 93
990 votes total - Letterman
- (2268)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bmillerw
- 5 stars Rating: 82
169 votes total - Freshman
- (146)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanRocky ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16767 votes total - Andrew Bell
- Heisman
- (22375)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8601 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
callen05 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1891 votes total - Starter
- (6434)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanRocky ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16767 votes total - Andrew Bell
- Heisman
- (22375)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8601 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
mriderblue12
- 4 stars Rating: 73
3998 votes total - Starter
- (8979)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8601 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SpartanRocky ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16767 votes total - Andrew Bell
- Heisman
- (22375)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanRocky said...
At this point, all those are are HS kids with stars next to their name. They could prove their worth, or go the way of William Campbell. That's why they don't award Big 10 titles based on how many stars your team has on paper . . .
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by xxmgobluexx on 2/3/2012 at 1:36 PM
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8601 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
xxmgobluexx said...
Not saying they do, but you yourself talk about needing stars to compete . . .
Edit: Avery, Clark, Black, Ryan have all seen time on the field, Avery with the game sealing pick vs tOSU, Clark with a INT in the BCS Sugar Bowl, Ryan produced big all year as Freshman. The others have seen the field also.
Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.
SpartanRocky ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16767 votes total - Andrew Bell
- Heisman
- (22375)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanRocky said...
At this point, all those are are HS kids with stars next to their name. They could prove their worth, or go the way of William Campbell. That's why they don't award Big 10 titles based on how many stars your team has on paper . . .
This post has been edited 4 times, most recently by Kenetic on 2/3/2012 at 1:57 PM
Kenetic
- 4 stars Rating: 78
161 votes total - Freshman
- (406)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SpartanRocky said...
That's in reference to "4-star talent" on the field, not in terms of recruiting. You need "4-star quality" athletes to compete; whether or not a recruiting service is able to label them such is immaterial. That you don't know till they've been on campus a few years, which is why you have to look at the program as a whole rather than just 1 class. The year MSU brought in their "best class since 2001" the Spartans went 6-7.
I do agree that a 4-star on signing day is more likely to actually play like a "4-star" than someone labeled a "2-star", but that's not a guarantee that they're going to pan out (and, FWIW, MSU didn't bring in many 2-stars, 2 at most by the varying recruiting services). I think that highly rated recruiting classes work out better than lower-rated ones, but I just watched top 10-15 rated Michigan classes get beat on and the same things happen at FSU, ND and Texas. UGA has recruited in the top 10 every year since 2002 (till this year I believe), and they went 6-7 in '10.
We'll know how good UM's class is in 2014 at the earliest.
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8601 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MgoBlueland
- 5 stars Rating: 95
409 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (558)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
















Big Ten superlatives