-
Kalani69
- 5 stars Rating: 89
65 votes total - Freshman
- (118)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
getmyjive11 said...
Why would you cite carries and then yards from scrimmage? Why not go back one more year to include Chris Johnson's 2000 yard season? Why are you using players that were born in Cali but never played football there? In that case, Foster should be on the national side.
Like I said, you are cherry picking. And even then, the national team comes out on top.
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 74
2249 votes total - Letterman
- (2339)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
Here's a more concise version of the running back comparison.
BTW, I don't know where you got your wrong info from, but all 6 RB's used in this comparison played high school football in California.
6 of the NFL's top RB's Past 2 seasons from A.Peterson, R.Rice, C.Johnson, F.Gore, J.Charles, and Alfred Morris(1 yr). ================================== 3,198 carries/receptions 16,352 yards from scrimmage 5.1 yards per touch 98 TD's
6 California RB's Past 2 seasons from A.Foster, M.Lynch, R.Bush, R.Mathews, MJD, and Doug Martin(1 yr). ================================ 3,243 carries/receptions 16,255 yards from scrimmage 5.0 per touch 101 TD's
It's practically even over the last 2 years, basically because AP's amazing almost all-time rushing record season. I think it's pretty remarkable that the comparison can even be made, considering these 6 RB's from California have produced the same numbers as the top 6 RB's the rest of the NFL has to offer currently.
Maybe you should just give some credit where credit is due. It's not going to kill you to acknowledge that California is running the show in the NFL (just like the NBA and MLB) is it?
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by getmyjive11 on 3/6/2013 at 2:05 PM
getmyjive11 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6828 votes total - Starter
- (9784)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
CRgator1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
620 votes total - Walk-on
- (2791)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
getmyjive11 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6828 votes total - Starter
- (9784)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
CRgator1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
620 votes total - Walk-on
- (2791)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 74
2249 votes total - Letterman
- (2339)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
getmyjive11 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
6828 votes total - Starter
- (9784)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
getmyjive11 said...
It's fairly obvious to anyone without their noses stuffed deep inside Cali's ass that the reason the national team got more touches is because they were more valuable and trusted. If Charles was not hurt, the numbers would be far apart (something that started to show in your initial 3 year figures).
z28 foody
- 4 stars Rating: 75
882 votes total - Varsity
- (1236)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
getmyjive11 said...
It's fairly obvious to anyone without their noses stuffed deep inside Cali's ass that the reason the national team got more touches is because they were more valuable and trusted. If Charles was not hurt, the numbers would be far apart (something that started to show in your initial 3 year figures).
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 74
2249 votes total - Letterman
- (2339)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Refresh
California vs the rest of the NFL - Who Wins?