Online Now 3055

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2080
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3525
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Commentary on this Fiscal Cliff deal....

  • JoeHoo said...

    He's actually a little more like Frank. Unwilling to budge from the status quo.

    both suck when the game is on the line.

    signature image signature image signature image

    vtfan_90

  • vtfan_90 said...

    Yep and what I meant by that is great motivational speakers rah rah type guys. Willing to push blame to everybody else when something goes wrong. And I would not trust either one with the game on the line to make the right decision for their team or country in this case.

    I really have no faith in the gov't right now. I agree with you the election suck because the first 4 years a president is in office is a waste.. The first 2 years are a celebration/victory tour and the next 2 years are spent trying to get back in for another 4 years.

    Not really a great comparison because college coaches can't really give in or compromise. Obama is about to talk the talk,but ain't walkin' the walk. I see him caving in to keep the economy from collapsing. He'll probably give up something here from some capital later on to deal with immigration or energy. It's going to stretch out til the very end to because it's not politically damaging to do otherwise.

    By the way, don't be surprised if our nice politicians take some nice vacation time between now and New Year's. It's not like there isn't anything important to get done between now and then. fingergun

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    $55B from both non-defense discretionary and defense spending for FY 2013-2022.

    If you are talking about pure deficit reduction, the fiscal cliff is a good thing.

    However, the size and scope of the cuts at this time are ill-timed.

    The cuts and taxes will likely send the economy back into recession which not only contracts gdp (lowering one end of the debt to gdp ratio) it also will likely offset some of the deficit reduction in lower revenue.

    Basically, the whole point of not letting the cliff happen is to deal with future deficits in a way that doesn't hamper economic growth significantly. This can be done in different ways.

    That's hardly austerity. 55B is a drop in the bucket in national terms. I wouldn't mind seeing this happen. Why would any conservative fight this?

    ReasonableDoubt

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Not really a great comparison because college coaches can't really give in or compromise. Obama is about to talk the talk,but ain't walkin' the walk. I see him caving in to keep the economy from collapsing. He'll probably give up something here from some capital later on to deal with immigration or energy. It's going to stretch out til the very end to because it's not politically damaging to do otherwise.

    By the way, don't be surprised if our nice politicians take some nice vacation time between now and New Year's. It's not like there isn't anything important to get done between now and then. fingergun

    Probably all go Golfing!!!blackeye

    signature image signature image signature image

    vtfan_90

  • ReasonableDoubt said...

    That's hardly austerity. 55B is a drop in the bucket in national terms. I wouldn't mind seeing this happen. Why would any conservative fight this?

    It's from both, so it's $110B just in spending cuts. Combine that with the tax increases and its a hefty toll on the economy. The whole point of deficit reduction is to slow the growth or reduce the debt to gdp ratio. So in reality it's about FUTURE deficits.

    If the economy contracts, the debt to gdp ratio increases even if we don't add any debt. Now add on the fact we'd still have $600B nominally added.

    A perfect plan would be to get FUTURE deficits down to under an averaged growth rate as a percentage of GDP. If the deficit is lower than that averaged rate, the debt to gdp ratio will decrease.

    It's unlikely we will 3.4% a year growth averages like we did between 1900-1990.

    It would be more reasonable to get the deficit as a percentage of GDP down to around 2%. It should be in the sixes for FY 2013. If the economy improves, the growth rate rises (one part the equation of nominal debt/GDP) and the deficit reduces due to increased revenues (the other part of the equation).

    The best way to lower our debt to gdp ratio is to grow out of it. Period.

    If we can cut some this year, more the next, more the next and so on and get back to fiscal responsibility during good years, we can accomplish this.

    In a same world, we would balance the books during good times and run them during bad times. Sadly, we haven't done that in the past. Hopefully we can in the future.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • Look, my wife and I are as middle class as it gets. We play by the rules, we pay our mortgage on time, we pay the rest of our bills, taxes, insurance on everything out the ass, whatever. We will owe several thousand more dollars next year if this doesn't go through. We've worked hard to cut a few hundred dollars a month out of our expenses to free up some money. Gone. In a blink. Even worse, the small business I work for will see some bad effects from the payroll tax breaks expiring. people will lose their jobs. people will have less discretionary income to SPEND and stimulate the economy.

    It is so simple that allowing this to happen right now would be a disaster for the economy, and if they can't get a deal done, frankly its a slap in the face to people like us who never ask for anything and are productive citizens to society and government. We pay. and we pay. and we pay. and we pay. we are deciding whether or not we can afford our first kid. We look around and see jobless degenerates popping out baby after baby after baby...we are already paying for their kids. have another baby. here is another $100 a month. now the government just needs a little more. just a little more.

    its just not the time right now to do this. obviously we need a balanced budget as a country and that has to combine revenue sources and spending. but hitting the middle class in the face right now, as well as small business, is dangerous.

    This post was edited by cockengr on 12/4/2012 at 3:07 PM

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    Look, my wife and I are as middle class as it gets. We play by the rules, we pay our mortgage on time, we pay the rest of our bills, taxes, insurance on everything out the ass, whatever. We will owe several thousand more dollars next year if this doesn't go through. We've worked hard to cut a few hundred dollars a month out of our expenses to free up some money. Gone. In a blink. Even worse, the small business I work for will see some bad effects from the payroll tax breaks expiring. people will lose their jobs. people will have less discretionary income to SPEND and stimulate the economy.

    It is so simple that allowing this to happen right now would be a disaster for the economy, and if they can't get a deal done, frankly its a slap in the face to people like us who never ask for anything and are productive citizens to society and government. We pay. and we pay. and we pay. and we pay. we are deciding whether or not we can afford our first kid. We look around and see jobless degenerates popping out baby after baby after baby...we are already paying for their kids. have another baby. here is another $100 a month. now the government just needs a little more. just a little more.

    clap I'm with you man

    signature image signature image signature image

    vtfan_90

  • cockengr said...

    Look, my wife and I are as middle class as it gets. We play by the rules, we pay our mortgage on time, we pay the rest of our bills, taxes, insurance on everything out the ass, whatever. We will owe several thousand more dollars next year if this doesn't go through. We've worked hard to cut a few hundred dollars a month out of our expenses to free up some money. Gone. In a blink. Even worse, the small business I work for will see some bad effects from the payroll tax breaks expiring. people will lose their jobs. people will have less discretionary income to SPEND and stimulate the economy.

    It is so simple that allowing this to happen right now would be a disaster for the economy, and if they can't get a deal done, frankly its a slap in the face to people like us who never ask for anything and are productive citizens to society and government. We pay. and we pay. and we pay. and we pay. we are deciding whether or not we can afford our first kid. We look around and see jobless degenerates popping out baby after baby after baby...we are already paying for their kids. have another baby. here is another $100 a month. now the government just needs a little more. just a little more.

    its just not the time right now to do this. obviously we need a balanced budget as a country and that has to combine revenue sources and spending. but hitting the middle class in the face right now, as well as small business, is dangerous.

    You were literally hitting a homerun and batting .1000 until you got to here. Sorry but our problem never has been one of welfare. It's a lot more complicated than that. It's a lot bigger than that.

    Everything else is spot on. clap

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    You were literally hitting a homerun and batting .1000 until you got to here. Sorry but our problem never has been one of welfare. It's a lot more complicated than that. It's a lot bigger than that.

    Everything else is spot on. clap

    its part of the problem. not welfare itself and the exact dollar figures of whats abused and what isn't, but the entitlement mentality and rewarding nonproductive behavior (this is my personal opinion and there is a little bit of a moral argument there that we can leave out)

    but yeah that was minor aside/rant to me just describing how it would affect us personally.

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    its part of the problem. not welfare itself and the exact dollar figures of whats abused and what isn't, but the entitlement mentality and rewarding nonproductive behavior (this is my personal opinion and there is a little bit of a moral argument there that we can leave out)

    but yeah that was minor aside/rant to me just describing how it would affect us personally.

    I'm with BLF, the rest of your post was spot on. I won't deny that welfare's a problem, but it's a minimal problem that's merely a social policy point that has been hyped up because it's easier to point to welfare recipients as the cause of American economic troubles than to address the numerous holes in our tax structure and the economic policies that led to the recession.

    Simply put: welfare should be addressed, but if we actually want to fix the American economy and not just look for scapegoats, welfare is pretty far down on the priority list of things that need to be fixed.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    I'm with BLF, the rest of your post was spot on. I won't deny that welfare's a problem, but it's a minimal problem that's merely a social policy point that has been hyped up because it's easier to point to welfare recipients as the cause of American economic troubles than to address the numerous holes in our tax structure and the economic policies that led to the recession.

    Simply put: welfare should be addressed, but if we actually want to fix the American economy and not just look for scapegoats, welfare is pretty far down on the priority list of things that need to be fixed.

    I can agree with that more or less....it was more of a frustration with the attitude than with looking at the dollar figures and how big a piece of the pie it is.

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    its part of the problem. not welfare itself and the exact dollar figures of whats abused and what isn't, but the entitlement mentality and rewarding nonproductive behavior (this is my personal opinion and there is a little bit of a moral argument there that we can leave out)

    but yeah that was minor aside/rant to me just describing how it would affect us personally.

    I think it's worth noting the difference between an entitlement like Medicare and Social Security and welfare like TANF and SNAP. The former are components of a social contract that is paid into and expected (hence the term entitlement). They are components of a social welfare (not to be confused with the other welfare) state that includes generational support. The latter is what can be considered nonproductive incentives and is truly WELFARE. This I have no problem with restructuring or reforming, but again, its a small part of the complex problem of the deficit.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • cockengr said...

    I can agree with that more or less....it was more of a frustration with the attitude than with looking at the dollar figures and how big a piece of the pie it is.

    That's understandable. Generally, I'm a champion for the lower classes (especially considering I came from nothing), but I recently had an annoying experience that left a bad taste in my mouth.

    I was looking for a new apartment, and I found a couple buildings close to my work that looked perfect. Newly-renovated lofts, decent neighborhood, nightlife right downstairs. I go to apply for an apartment, and I was actually rejected because I make too much money. Apparently, the housing was all set aside for government subsidized Section 8 housing, and I make over 4 times the maximum allowable salary for even a full family living in the building.

    I felt like a jerk complaining about making too much money, but I'm pretty damn sure I owe more in student loans than anyone in those buildings owes for anything, and yet now I have to pay an extra couple hundred dollars/month for comparable housing if I want to live the same distance from work.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    It's from both, so it's $110B just in spending cuts. Combine that with the tax increases and its a hefty toll on the economy. The whole point of deficit reduction is to slow the growth or reduce the debt to gdp ratio. So in reality it's about FUTURE deficits.

    If the economy contracts, the debt to gdp ratio increases even if we don't add any debt. Now add on the fact we'd still have $600B nominally added.

    A perfect plan would be to get FUTURE deficits down to under an averaged growth rate as a percentage of GDP. If the deficit is lower than that averaged rate, the debt to gdp ratio will decrease.

    It's unlikely we will 3.4% a year growth averages like we did between 1900-1990.

    It would be more reasonable to get the deficit as a percentage of GDP down to around 2%. It should be in the sixes for FY 2013. If the economy improves, the growth rate rises (one part the equation of nominal debt/GDP) and the deficit reduces due to increased revenues (the other part of the equation).

    The best way to lower our debt to gdp ratio is to grow out of it. Period.

    If we can cut some this year, more the next, more the next and so on and get back to fiscal responsibility during good years, we can accomplish this.

    In a same world, we would balance the books during good times and run them during bad times. Sadly, we haven't done that in the past. Hopefully we can in the future.

    I don't think it will hurt the economy from what you have explained.

    Imo, our core priority should be to increase the value of the dollar. As the dollar goes up, gas goes down. That will boost the economy more than anything.

    ReasonableDoubt

  • Even 100B is a relatively small number on a national scale. This whole things seems like media hyperbole.

    ReasonableDoubt

  • ReasonableDoubt said...

    I don't think it will hurt the economy from what you have explained.

    Imo, our core priority should be to increase the value of the dollar. As the dollar goes up, gas goes down. That will boost the economy more than anything.

    Uh. No. Strengthening the dollar just so a commodity is cheaper is terrible fiscal policy.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • ReasonableDoubt said...

    Even 100B is a relatively small number on a national scale. This whole things seems like media hyperbole.

    The total YOY deficit reduction of all sequestration and sunsetting of tax cuts is equal to 4% of GDP. It's a big chunk.

    It was essentially a stop-gap measure to force action. It wasnt intended to actually happen.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Uh. No. Strengthening the dollar just so a commodity is cheaper is terrible fiscal policy.

    From my understanding of fiscal policy, and correct me if I'm wrong, doesn't a weaker dollar play to the United States advantage right now because it strengthens our exports and makes us rely more on domestic products?

    Jack Passion

  • Jack Passion said...

    From my understanding of fiscal policy, and correct me if I'm wrong, doesn't a weaker dollar play to the United States advantage right now because it strengthens our exports and makes us rely more on domestic products?

    Yes.

    Moreover, a smaller deficit would actually weaken the dollar.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • ReasonableDoubt said...

    That's hardly austerity. 55B is a drop in the bucket in national terms. I wouldn't mind seeing this happen. Why would any conservative fight this?

    Agreed. I say let it happen. Obama will be exposed for what he truly is. I'll pay the extra 4 k a year I would have too than to give into socialism.

    signature image

    A NovaNoles Design

    Humble Warrior

  • Humble Warrior said...

    Agreed. I say let it happen. Obama will be exposed for what he truly is. I'll pay the extra 4 k a year I would have too than to give into socialism.

    MOTHER. OF. GOD.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    MOTHER. OF. GOD.

    Too much fox news lol

    Jack Passion

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    MOTHER. OF. GOD.

    I thought most of these idiots crawled back to their parents' basements after the election?

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    I thought most of these idiots crawled back to their parents' basements after the election?

    When Hillary cleans up in 2016, it will be a meltdown of epic proportions.

    Jack Passion

  • CMXI said...

    I thought most of these idiots crawled back to their parents' basements after the election?

    I don't understand how so many people don't get what all this stuff is. It's so embarrassing.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba