Online Now 3259

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1544
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3623
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Commentary on this Fiscal Cliff deal....

  • Jack Passion said...

    When Hillary cleans up in 2016, it will be a meltdown of epic proportions.

    Considering the Republican base has been declining/dying off at a rate of around ~2M per election through the last 3 elections, it'll be absolute chaos. Delicious, delicious chaos.

    Hillary also couldn't have asked for a better setup for 2016 - Republican politicians lost their seats across the country this year for anti-women actions and comments. If Republicans think the Hispanic and African-American swings for Obama were bad, wait'll you add in the female vote.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I don't understand how so many people don't get what all this stuff is. It's so embarrassing.

    It's depressing to me. One of the main reasons why so many inept, incompetent, and flat out dangerous politicians are still in office is due to this type of idiocy and unwillingness to wade through the BS to seek out facts.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    It's depressing to me. One of the main reasons why so many inept, incompetent, and flat out dangerous politicians are still in office is due to this type of idiocy and unwillingness to wade through the BS to seek out facts.

    It's easier to repeat talking points from the "news" network that asked for and got a ruling from a federal judge that they are allowed to lie even when "reporting the news" under the First Amendment.

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • CockAtLaw said...

    It's easier to repeat talking points from the "news" network that asked for and got a ruling from a federal judge that they are allowed to lie even when "reporting the news" under the First Amendment.

    Hey, it's obviously still "Fair and Balanced," and if you complain about it, you're clearly a communist atheist Muslim.

    Play

    Romney Grandma calls Obama a "Muslim, Athe...

    Romney Grandma calls Obama a "Muslim, Atheist Communist"

    http://www.youtube.com/v/VOb7UCRUASA
    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • I went to a tax seminar today. The morning session focused on the tax changes if no action is taken by the govt. Among those are:

    Income rates go back to the pre Bush tax rates
    Tuition and fees deduction goes away
    american opportunity tuition tax credits decrease
    SE tax increases/medicare tax increases
    standard deduction for MFJ decreases
    $250 deduction for out of pocket expenses by teachers goes away
    child tax credit decreases
    student loan interest deduction will be limited to 60 months per loan
    no bonus depreciation for business purchases of capital assets
    179 expensing limit decreases to 25k
    EIC changes its calculation which will effect decrease the credit
    Capital gains tax rates increase
    qualified dividends rates increase
    Estate tax increases while the credit decreases - you could save millions by dying before the end of the year

    There are many more changes that will increase pretty much everyone's tax bill. Get ready to have the government take more of your money. It was pretty scary hearing all of this. If nothing is done, people are going to have some serious sticker shock when filing in 2014. Spending MUST be cut drastically. We need to get back to sound principles.

    BGZATUA

  • Serious sticker shock? Like filing in 2000 or 1999?

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • CockAtLaw said...

    Serious sticker shock? Like filing in 2000 or 1999?

    Gonna have to defer to someone else. I didn't even file a return in those years.

    BGZATUA

  • BGZATUA said...

    Gonna have to defer to someone else. I didn't even file a return in those years.

    There is no statute of limitations for failing to file a return, so you better start working on that.

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • CockAtLaw said...

    There is no statute of limitations for failing to file a return, so you better start working on that.

    Nah, I'm good.

    BGZATUA

  • Lets see, both sides posture and rattle sabers until the last two or three days before the deadline, then give just a flinch on either side, create a HUGE bill with tons and tons of other non mentioned pork for both sides, then wait til a Sat night between 8-12 to pass everything without reading it and save us all from being broke while we are not even paying attention... Am I close?

    Goldrusher35

  • Goldrusher35 said...

    Lets see, both sides posture and rattle sabers until the last two or three days before the deadline, then give just a flinch on either side, create a HUGE bill with tons and tons of other non mentioned pork for both sides, then wait til a Sat night between 8-12 to pass everything without reading it and save us all from being broke while we are not even paying attention... Am I close?

    You left out that anything that does pass, if at all, will be nothing more than a short term 1-2 year patch, that way we can have the fight all over again before the next election.

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • Jack Passion said...

    Agreed. Austerity should be preformed when the economy is on stable grounds. Europe attempted to cut their way out of debt and ended up in much, much worse shape.

    Exactly.

    You just don't do these things when you're trying to come out of a recession.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • Humble Warrior said...

    Agreed. I say let it happen. Obama will be exposed for what he truly is. I'll pay the extra 4 k a year I would have too than to give into socialism.

    cyclops

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    It's a sad circus of self-serving shitheads.

    Spot on. This comment should have ended the thread.

    VTSmitty

  • Jack Passion said...

    Agreed. Austerity should be preformed when the economy is on stable grounds. Europe attempted to cut their way out of debt and ended up in much, much worse shape.

    Raising taxes isn't going to be helpful for the economy either. From what you have written it seems as though you want the tax increases without the spending cuts. That accomplishes nothing.

    IMO we should raise taxes, and cut spending to equal the increase in tax revenue over ten years. That's how you balance a budget.

    The economy can't rely on government spending forever. The cord has to be cut at some point. And raising taxes alone will do nothing but increase Uncle Sams cash flow. It won't hardly make a dent in the deficit.

    TroyTide

  • joetheogre said...

    Exactly.

    You just don't do these things when you're trying to come out of a recession.

    You don't raise taxes in a down economy either. But both have to be done. Might as well be now.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    Raising taxes isn't going to be helpful for the economy either. From what you have written it seems as though you want the tax increases without the spending cuts. That accomplishes nothing.

    IMO we should raise taxes, and cut spending to equal the increase in tax revenue over ten years. That's how you balance a budget.

    The economy can't rely on government spending forever. The cord has to be cut at some point. And raising taxes alone will do nothing but increase Uncle Sams cash flow. It won't hardly make a dent in the deficit.

    This isn't the time to balance the budget though. As I stated the best thing we can do is recover from the recession, then balance the budget. How we recover from the recession has to be to increase spending on projects that have proven to have a high multiplier effect, such as infrastructure, education, etc. which will provide tons of jobs and economic growth. The federal deficit isn't something that should be dictating our policies right now.

    As for an increase on taxes, it has been proven that increasing taxes on the wealthy doesn't stunt economic growth, or create jobs whatsoever.

    Your plan, which was tried in europe by the way, is to slash everything, thinking that is the path to economic prosperity. Obviously the evidence in europe speaks for itself.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Jack Passion on 12/5/2012 at 12:00 AM

    Jack Passion

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Well it takes time for it all to go through, but yes rates would rise back to Clinton levels for income,cap gains...payroll taxes would go back to pre-2011 levels...defense cuts would take a little longer.

    Yes! The fiscal cliff will end all "bush tax cuts for the rich" so why are liberals trying to fight for the 98% now? Good question!

    lestat

  • Jack Passion said...

    This isn't the time to balance the budget though. As I stated the best thing we can do is recover from the recession, then balance the budget. How we recover from the recession has to be to increase spending on projects that have proven to have a high multiplier effect, such as infrastructure, education, etc. which will provide tons of jobs and economic growth. The federal deficit isn't something that should be dictating our policies right now.

    As for an increase on taxes, it has been proven that increasing taxes on the wealthy doesn't stunt economic growth, or create jobs whatsoever.

    Your plan, which was tried in europe by the way, is to slash everything, thinking that is the path to economic prosperity. Obviously the evidence in europe speaks for itself.

    The problem in Europe is the PIIGS and uncertainty over the future of the the Euro. All of which was create by runaway spending.

    Also if now is not the time to balance the budget, why raise taxes?

    We have a serious problem here, we have an economy that largely relies on federal spending and bailouts to function, but the Feds are so far in debt that the interest payments they make on their debt are already %10 of expenditures and growing meaning meaning they will have to borrow ever increasing sums of money to pay the countries bills, support an anemic economy, and pay the damn interest.

    We can't do this forever, at some point we are going to hear crickets chirping at a US bond auction.

    And here we are trying to figure out how to just lower the damn deficit, and no matter the plan in ten years time we still won't have a balanced budget...we are screwed, simple as that. IDK how high this thing can go, but I am sure things will get pretty tense around the $25 trillion mark.

    TroyTide

  • I don't feel like replying to all the different people ITT, so I'll just make points relating to each:

    -No one is talking about not cutting the deficit. It's about making sure the deficit reduction doesn't get in the way of a full recovery to get back to reasonable growth rates.

    -The push to sunset tax cuts for the "rich" stems from a belief that their effect is minimal to the recovery based on consumption but still bring in revenue.

    -Taxes will have to be a part of any deficit reduction, but what is MOST IMPORTANT is tax reform.

    -Spending cuts will have to be a part of any deficit reduction, but what is MOST IMPORTANT is entitlement reform

    -The PIIGS nation's debt problems don't stem from spending in and of itself, it stems from spending in someone else's currency. If they had control over their own monetary policy and therefore their fiscal policy, they could have already taken measures to deal with their debt in their own [painful] way.

    -The US will NEVER be Greece because we not only control our own currency, but we are the reserve currency of the world. We've already seen false cries about interest rates, hyperinflation, debt levels etc. etc. Most of these are based on macroeconomic studies of past failures. These tend to occur in small countries (more common, easier to study). They can be helpful guides, but don't necessarily bring in the most accurate scope for specific situations.

    -Now, that last post DOES NOT mean we get to ignore our problems. We need to reduce the deficit, but it needs to be in a productive, reform-minded manner that helps the economy and in turn the most measurement of all: THE DEBT TO GDP RATIO.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • Humble Warrior said...

    Agreed. I say let it happen. Obama will be exposed for what he truly is. I'll pay the extra 4 k a year I would have too than to give into socialism.

    It's like watching a trainwreck, then you all look at each other wondering : WTF JUST HAPPENED?

    WRobins