In partnership with CBSSports.com
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
An AU team with no OCord.. Yes they did beat us.
But bama beat AU in 2009....Then we beat them in 2010. So what is your point. What happens one year doesnt mean a thing on what will happen the next.
Ask any usc fan and they are thrilled they got to play OU. OU was AWFUL. If they would have played AU it would have been much more than a game.
But keep on dreamin that dream. Maybe in it duh U will actually become relevant again!
If you cant be honest....whats the point of being anything?
I'm not biased at all you're the one that's biased USC would of wiped the floor with that Auburn team. It would of been name your score Reggae bush would be somersaulting in the end zone, remember the a$$ beating they put on you the year before, whats your excuse for that one?
This post was edited by jmsmooth33 18 months ago
Refer to my post to see why the year before matters none.
lol this actually makes sense
You're lucky the BCS didn't put you in that game or that would be your team getting embarassed on national TV, whose going to stop REggie Bush, Steve Smith, d Byrd, lendale white? C'mon they would of hung 50 on you guys easy..
I'm not an auburn fan. It would have been a close game. I don't care if you throw all those big names at me. Games are played on the field, and all that star power struggled mightily in like 5 games. Not just once as you keep saying. Two of those games were against bad teams. USC was very beatable that year regardless of what they looked like on paper.
Our defense was #1 in the nation that year in scoring and #3 over all.
ND's defense was ranked number 1 till they played the tide, stats are overrated look at the talent the trojans had on offense they would of scored early and often against your defense.
We had an outstanding offense that year. USC cheated anyway. That's like saying Mark McGwire is the best player ever
AU should have been there for sure. I think it would have been a game, however, where it could have gone to either team. Both teams were loaded with talent. Whatever your opinion as to how a mythical 2004 AU vs. USC game would have gone, we can all agree that it would have been a lot more compelling than the @$$ raping Oklahoma took. 35-0 at halftime! I hope all the AP voters in the press box had a come to Jesus moment after that game.
Started at the bottom, now we here.....better get used to it.
That Ole Miss team that everyone gives no credit to because they are Ole Miss went on to the Cotton Bowl and absolutely destroyed the Big 12 co-champ and one of the "greatest offenses ever". Bring some facts to the table instead of spewing ridiculous crap.
That USC team had Clay Matthews, Maulauaga, Cushing, Maivia thats 4 LB's drafted in the pro's not bad eh? Florida's loss was also at home while USC's was on the road. USC destroyed basically everyone that year and almost held ND w/o a first down for an entire game, idc how bad they are that's still one of the most impressive things I have ever witnessed. SEC bias, USC should of been in that game no doubt..
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports