In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 2401
Online now 1611 Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Thread took an interesting turn
So you want me to say yes?
cant believe I quoted that, all apologies guys...
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by Goldrusher35 15 months ago
Gomez should be banned. Worst poster on this board and that's saying a lot.
Seconded. That type of language is offensive.
Sad to say it, but he's out of here
If China wanted to invade us, given they have 300%+ more people than we do, they could if the military wasn't here. And those 75,000 gun holders could all be wiped out in a series of airstrikes.
You can't actually think you could defend yourself, even with a fully automatic weapon. Air strikes, artillary, all of that stuff would wipe you out.
Please research a .223 before continuing to spew ignorant fallacies everywhere.
An "AR", or semi-auto .223 rifle was actually designed to wound, not kill, and is essentially the SAME projectile as a .22 rifle with more energy.
Someone clearly more educated on the subject at hand.
If you'd read my comment after that, you would see you're making an ass out of yourself.
Someone that knows more shit than you.
I'm sorry, but I still can't believe people are honestly stupid enough to believe this load of crap.
Watch Tiny Moments Of Comfort now. Also, surf around Break to find the funniest videos and pictures galleries that have been hand-picked by our editors.
Hahahahah. This post made my day and it is only 8:15!!!! Thanks Gomez!!!
I simply don't believe you know anyone involved with the Newtown shooting. This is the first time you've mentioned it and you never said a word about knowing anyone involved in the 50 other gun threads that popped up after the shooting.
I WANT AN ANSWER TO THIS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY!
This post was edited by Marshall Nole 15 months ago
I have a .308 caliber military style rifle that I use for target shooting.
Instead of buying a separate bolt action type rifle to hunt with the very few times I ever hunt, I hunt with my .308 military style rifle. Are you saying I shouldn't be allowed to do this?
How is it hurting you that I am hunting with a .308 military style rifle?
Yeah and if people really think the sexton chick is the same one from FL and Colorado geez they are retarded they look similar but no where close to the same person.
750,000 in one state. No one will ever successfully invade the US because of the 2nd amendment.
Also, the Chinese air force is stuck in the 1980's. We don't have to worry about them.
I don't believe it either. I was saying that is the origin of a lot of the conspiracy theories. It is definitely interesting.
My apologies I thought you were saying that. My bad dude yeah those that think they are the same either are half blind or what.
Should we allow personal rocket launchers and personal nuclear weapons? We may need them in the next red dawn scenario
What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
Not sure how this is relevant.
No one here is equating a .223 rifle to a rocket launcher. I don't see anyone saying we should be able to own a personal nuke.
I'm just playing devils advocate . Where do we draw the line?
Yep. The premise of the question is just to say, "Okay, obviously we shouldn't allow nukes. That means you do recognize that public safety is valued over personal freedom in some instances. Now that we're in relative moral terms, we can talk about the practicality of gun ownership."
If you are asking me personally?
Draw the line at assault rifles.
Like I said, I own a .308 caliber military style assault rifle. Mainly I take it to the range and shoot at paper. I CAN and WILL use it for hunting though. I do not own a bolt action style rifle and don't feel like buying one simply to go hunt when my .308 is perfectly suitable to take hunting with me.
No reason, IMO, for such a weapon to be banned.
hunting is irrelevent. self-defense and "militia" per the u.s. constitution are relevent
Hmmm.. I was combating the argument people make here that hunting is okay. I am saying I hunt with the rifle I listed above.
Should I be able to own the rifle I described, in your opinion?
yes. hunting is not the issue for me. it's self-defense/militia. i support gun-rights
This post was edited by scinsc5 15 months ago
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports