In partnership with CBSSports.com
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
it's opinion and hypothetical tbh and it's a little odd that so many people even care. I indicated that I doubt you read the thread because I already directly addressed a post identical to your and acknowledge that due to Auburn beating we went to the SECCG last year. Being that you posted "AU beat SC and UF last year with a worse team than this year. Or did you forget about that?" soon after I just acknowlegded that I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you just didn't read every post and it was not an issue of comprehension, but since you acknowledged that you have read every post, well...
I'm not even sure what point your making... that even though yall were admittedly terrible and inferior to us you could have had an at best equal record with our schedule... OK Congrats.
It's funny how you come at me as not making sense but BetterOff stated that you might lose to UF too. Does it only not make sense when I say it?
I know imagine how good we could have been if we had our "best tackle" (3 star guy yet to play a down of CFB). You sound like a UGA homer. Man what we could have been.
This post was edited by SocialTwerker 23 months ago
I did state that they could because you said with Brantley, but then when I saw that both UGA and AU played them without him I said AU wins.
Same for UT. UGA played UT with Bray starting. UT beats AU with Bray more than likely. Without him, AU probably would have won.
Anyways, fun conversation with you. No need for some to get bent out of shape (not talking about the Pastor. He's a great poster). Completely hypothetical with no right answer.
You need him.
Late to the discussion, but there is no way UGA loses fewer than 4 regular season games last year with Auburn's schedule.
They'd have to win two of:
With UGA's regular season schedule, Auburn loses to Boise, goes 10-2, plays in the SECCG, and may very well end up 11-3 with a victory over MSU in the bowl game.
I feel like we beat @ Arky and @ Clemson personally. I know it's not a popular opinion but teams with that play style gave us no problems last year. The teams that beat us beat us with a solid D and with a steady run game that would quickly fatigue our lacking depth. Our fist 22 could beat any 22 we played last year, but unfortunately that's not what the games were. I don't see Clemson or Arky wearing us down like that. It really depends on what time of the year we played them though. We picked a bad year to schedule our hardest games as the first two given how young we were.
If they win those two they go 10-2 or 9-3 pending SCar. Having watched the week 2 game several times, I have no problem with thinking we could have handily beat them in week 5.
I'm with you on AU being 9-3, maybe 10-2 with UGA's schedule, but I don't see beating Michigan St.
Being as good as you head to head and beating the same schools that you beat, most of which were worse off than we were are not the same things. We were the fourth best team in the West and bested every team we played in the East, save you guys. Our teams were not equal, but neither was the competition. That is all I am saying.
Not arguing with you at all, just discussing. Ironically, you say that I didn't see that you acknowledged that we beat them and I failed to realize that, then you attempt to make the exact same point that we would have somehow lost to them. Maybe I am just missing it, but it still does not make sense. Anyhow, fun talk indeed.
this sh7t is priceless
Wow, that is from way out there in left field. Are you sure you know what thread you are on????
I would accept some trash talking if they just won an SEC championship!!!!
I definitely got in the wrong thread. I'll stick by the prediction though. Cheers.
Thats all speculation, FACT... Georgia 45, Auburn 7
so is this, LITTLE BROTHER>
So does that make them our littlest brother?
Clemson would be your littlest brother.
What? No way man. They would be like the bastard red headed stepchild
they are our bastard. they came from us.
South Carolina 45
facts and such.
AU - 16
SCar - 13
More facts and such...
Started at the bottom, now we here.....better get used to it.
Newton's Law: A Newton in motion will remain in motion, unless acted upon by an endzone.
That list is isn't accurate, plus you have 13 people starting on offense just so that you can add players that havent been in the system long. You squeezed in as many young people as possible to make a false point.
In the end, Bama averages 3.5 years experience and Auburn averages 3.4 years experience from the starters. That isn't time speant in the program b/c bama will start about 3 jucos that'll put us under auburn.
no i didn't you turd. i made it accurate by formation.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports