In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 2043
Online now 1328 Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
That post was
Do whatever makes you sleep better at night, I guess....
Wasn't referring to you specifically, just all the other posters who were saying there was no way Wangler would keep up with Samuel in space.
Would Wangler win a foot race with Samuel? Not a chance. Doesn't mean that Wangler wouldn't be able to tackle him in space. Taking the right route and forcing him into another tackler/the sideline would even it out though.
Yea! That you LOST! lol
The brave don't live long but Cowards don't live at All!
He had to show up eventually. He was nonexistent the other 81 defensive plays.
Yale and EMU were feeling good about Wangler too...
He was committed to LBU so whatever
great PU for ya , congrats
Not me so you're wrong.
I dream of a day when chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.
Thanks bro...appreciate it
Ahem...I haven't mentioned stars....this was my attempt at community outreach....
Yeah I didn't either, he literally must not understand the meaning of the word literally.
Didn't see too much of Jake Ryan when Hyde was gashing michigan for 145
You guys completely missed his point. Berger is a walk on and Hubbard is a high 80s guy.
Arn't you the fans who make fun of MSU fans for saying stars don't mean anything?
So now Michigan fans are saying stars don't matter, but they have the #3 player so they will always win. Sounds like a wannabe team than a contender.
300+ comments for this thread? Haha and 90% if the comments are not even about the commit. It's a good pickup for sure bucknutters there' no denying that.
This whole stars talk has me dying though. Whether it's 5 star pickups or 2 star pickups you have to realize that rankings are based on how college ready a player is at this very moment in time. Rankings have nothing to do with how good they will actually be in the future. Who knows just how much a 5 star has left to grow as a player. Who knows just how much a 2 star has left for growth. Every coach and fan hopes their teams player reaches the highest point of potential for them but that just doesn't happen always.
Be happy with your commits and move along. Just remember your coach offered them for some reason. Trust their evaluations, not analyst who most have never played a down of football in their life.
They actually mean the exact opposite. 5-stars are given to recruits who are projected as 1st-round draft picks and future AA's (i.e. the future).
I live in Birmingham Alabama and this thread is why our rivalry is the best. Auburn and Alabama fan know how to co-exist. They're neighbors and friends. Ohio state fan and scUM fans don't get along. That's why every thread on here turns into a 350 post flame.
he wouldn't let his players pose in the Playboy All-American magazine edition, he said, "Cause you can't play football with an erection."
That's why people go to jail for killing trees and death threats get made. Stupid people are all over the place.
Thanks. I'm referring more to the average fan. Look at the threads on this board
Sparty: "Signing 5 star recruits is irrelevant because of the remote possibility that they all happen to suck."
Bucknuts: "We have the 3rd ranked class and you guys are 7th, so obviously we're lapping you guys in recruiting and you'll never win another game against OSU."
I like to think I fall in between the two.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports