In partnership with CBSSports.com
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
This may have been posted here, but I just watched the video on YouTube.
The Secret Service can determine free speech zones?
I understand it was passed months ago, but I never heard about it.
And yet another 'bill' signed into law in secret. HR 347. Obama does it again. This time the attack is against the First Amendment and free speech. This new law make 'No Free Speech" Zones wherever the Secret Service says so. Bye bye Protests. Bye bye Free Speech. Bye bye Constitution.
BE SURE TO 'LIKE' SUBSCRIBE and SHARE
DISCLAIMER: This video contains copyrighted material and is used for educational purposes ONLY. I make no claim to any material used within the video. All copyrighted materials belong to their respective owners.
"This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is (1) non-commercial, (2) transformative in nature, (3) uses no more of the original work than necessary for the video's purpose, and (4) does not compete with the original work and could have no negative affect on it's market."
This post was edited by Jeff4SC 16 months ago
It shouldn't have been passed in the first place.
So like the video said....are you telling me a person can't stand on the opposite side of the street from the President and protest his policies?
The first amendment contains exceptions for time, place, and manner restrictions.
From my understanding, it refers to people trespassing in buildings and structured deemed "secure" by the Secret Service, no? I mean, I don't see anything wrong with proper security protocols to protect the President and other high value personnel. AFAIK, that doesn't mean you can't protest across the street. I'll go back in and read it to see.
Not being able to protest around the President so he can keep up appearances does not fall within those exceptions.
Can you give me the case cite to support your position?
You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#
If the rationale is for security reasons (or other legitimate reasons), then yes, it falls within the exception.
More of a security thing, IMO.
It is in line with the Patriot Act. Could it be abused? Definitely. Does that mean it will? No.
Bills like this need to monitored closely to see how they are inforced, but if used correctly, I see the positives from them as well.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports