In partnership with CBSSports.com
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Having the toughest schedule in the entire country by a large margin, going 3-1 against BCS top 10 teams should matter and when it comes down to it, the only thing that should matter is who you beat and how many wins you have, not style in which you do it.
Once we play FSU, we will have gone up against 5 schools ranked in the top 10 of the BCS. With how bad our offense is, you can't honestly say that is not impressive. We aren't blowing out teams like Oregon, but we are beating some of the best teams in the country and the computeres rightfully see that.
why would you shoot yourself... it isn't hat big of a deal...
You can't be serious, why cause he made a sleeping gesture with his hands ? I have seen maybe one solid hit from Elam all year
Dude is just talker, and not much more
and Evans flat out sucks
Tyler Hunter is a first year player, doesn't even start.... and has made just as many plays as Elam has
Hunter = 3 star
Elam = 5 star
Also there is no way you actually believe a 6'2" 230 pounder is gonna get bitched by a 5'9" 200 pound safety, Wilder was even a higher rated defensive prospect than Elam lol
fsufsu said... I've got about 10 great stories on Lane but all you need to know is he will never be a loser, that's for sure.
Three good wins, but computers don't see how those games were won just like computers can't see gow uf beat ULL... All they see is a W and that doesn't paint the whole picture
The fact that records mean everything when most teams don't play anybody is reason #235 as to why College Football stinks in terms of figuring out a true champion
That is a true statement.
Would also like to say the perception of the sec and it having three two loss teams is ridiculous... texas a&m, scar, and lsu haven't done a damn thing to deserve those rankings
Totally disagree here
not a damn thing ?
USCe beat the living piss out of #5 UGA
LSU came down to the wire with Bama and beat Texas A&M
Texas A&M beat Bama, the first team not named LSU to do that in almost 3 years
Also who is FSU's 3rd good win, you said 3 and I can only understand 2.... maybe, although VT is pushing it imo
A conference beating each other up doesn't justify them have three two loss teams in the top 10
What the difference between those three and other two loss teams like Oklahoma and stanford???
They play in the sec
Talent for the most part
Oklahoma and Stanford are solid, but not as good imo
Like you are saying with Jimbo, which is the eye test.... my eyes tell me LSU and USCe are better than those teams
UGA and Texas A&M too, I think most eyes would see this
I don't agree that FSU should be so low either, being behind 5 loss teams in the computers is just wrong
I think FSU is better than most teams out there and capable of playing with anybody, but they blew it and I know how this system is so its not gonna bother me anymore, FSU isn't a true national title contender to me... just a rebuilding program that is nearly rebuilt
2013 will be a lot more fun than this year, especially if certain players return
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports