In partnership with CBSSports.com
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Agreed. Whoever made it got it right this time.
I made them both lmao. No proof the first one ever existed now lol.
yea boooooo Michigan!
agreed...my man AZ right here created em... we are always forward thinking....
This post was edited by Harryberry 16 months ago
... I'd like to see a compelling counter argument if that is how you feel.
Which reminds me how lame the ND board is...
It wouldn't matter. All you'd do is just discount the facts we present.
still waiting for said "facts"
#1 in wins all time and #1 in winning percentage all time. Eleven NCs, which is tied for second most.
This post was edited by TAMUWolverine 16 months ago
and they're mostly from when?
A lot of the NCs game pre-1950. The winning has been very consistent though.
You must be forgetting their game against Missouri that year....
a lot? try all but one?
How about BCS bowls.. how many of those have you won?
These questions you're asking are dumb because eleven NCs and being #1 in all time wins/winning % get us in alone. Doesn't matter the time period. It happened, it counts. Nice try AZ, but Michigan is a blue blood no matter how much you try to think we aren't.
This debate isn't "was Michigan ONCE a blue blood?" ... this debate IS "is Michigan STILL a blue blood?" .. questionable to say the least.
This post was edited by 34WEbuckeye 16 months ago
LOL... your most recent one is going on 12 years old man. Not sure you have room to talk.
This post was edited by Clarkw267 16 months ago
Michigan will always be a blue blood. Not very questionable at all.
Agree...clearly scUM is the blueblood of the pre-helmet, pre-forward pass, pre-Korean War era. After 1948...not so much.
compared to a very questionable one, and the one prior was 1948... not to mention your relevancy in the BCS era on top of the 7 straight losses to other blue bloods as mentioned by OP. Up for vote I'd say.
You really want to talk about questionable... after that PI call in the endzone? Really?
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports