In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 1944
Online now 1489 Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Texas A&M, South Carolina, Alabama top re-ranked 2010 recruiting classes based on actual on-field production.
stopped reading after I saw Auburn at number 4
Its funny they listed Jake Holland as a starter...and he was
How is Bama not #1 with the nattys?
Who'd they lose to this year?
No and it definitely wasn't Michigan either.
Huh. Well whoever it was must have crapped the bed to not have been playing for a natty.
They will play for it next year I have no doubts.
FWIW, like 4 or 5 of AU's 32 players signed in their 2010 class lasted more than 2 years. That list is seriously one of the worst ever.
Technically, no one. They're 1-0 in 2013 so far.
If you were to rank AU's 2010 class now it would look like this:
This post was edited by coolstorybro 14 months ago
10 Major Poll National Titles (CFB record)
35 Bowl Wins (CFB record)
72 Wins over last 6 years (CFB record)
no you won't
Bama beats you easily next year
fsufsu said... I've got about 10 great stories on Lane but all you need to know is he will never be a loser, that's for sure.
The one class where we arguably didn't end up with the actual best class... of course we ended up like #5, the only time in the past six years.
Still potentially three first rounders (two guaranteed, basically) out of it. Pretty ridiculous stuff.
This is a terrible list, though.
I can live with our no names. As long as they produce on gameday.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports