In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 1911
Online now 1691 Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
well actually that is what global warming and green houses gases are based on, but it's ok you can be a sheep like the rest
yes because facts aren't facts based on the source, intelligent you are
You should read the attached. It's written and reviewed by climatologists who are actually conducting experiments.
0000000016 00000 n
0000001158 00000 n
0000000709 00000 n
0000001411 00000 n
0000001702 00000 n
0000002184 00000 n
0000002775 00000 n
0000003003 00000 n
0000003225 00000 n
0000003302 00000 n
0000003957 00000 n
0000004689 00000 n
0000005125 00000 n
0000005362 00000 n
0000006141 00000 n
0000006923 00000 n
0000007739 00000 n
0000008503 00000 n
0000009243 00000 n
0000000987 00000 n
You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#
If it's a scientific fact, it should be pretty simple to find a peer-reviewed article supporting your position. It shouldn't be difficult at all.
I think the problem is he/she doesn't understand what peer-reviewed means.
What do I know, I'm just some dumb kid.
Yes, because scientists don't have hobbies.
Send me your address and I'll autograph some of my journal articles and send them your way. Should be leisure reading for an astute science expert like yourself.
It's laughable that people like you think science is a "hoax"
You might find this useful
You might be my new favorite poster over here.
I feel pretty good about my bet. I know people on both sides and internal polls are showing Romney winning. Other polls that you are using have a plus 5 to plus 12 dems over republicans. This would mean more dems show up this year than 2008. Just don't see that happening. Also, like another poster said, the rallies are 10 to 1 for Romney in terms of people who show up. Hell, Obama people had Stevie Wonder play a get out the vote party in Ohio and only 200 people showed up. I see a 300+ electoral college win for Romney. We will see though.
BTW, I am up for a 3 month ban if obama wins instead of the sig bet. 3 month under 300 electoral votes. 6 months if 300 to 324. 1 year ban for 325 to 349 and 4 year ban if 350 and above for the winner in electoral college votes. Let me know who is up for this.
My son's message to Obama, Clemson, and Georgia
Yes you are in. Looking forward to Tuesday if so.
BTW, forgot to post this.
Fundamentals usually prevail in American elections. That's bad news for Barack Obama. True, Americans want to think well of their presidents and many think it would be bad if Americans were perceived as rejecting the first black president.
We still have our bet right?
I'm in for Obama for whatever the terms are.
I'll do a 3 month sig bet.
Man, that guy's scientific process for determining who will win states is just top-notch.
Until Nate Silver says otherwise, I'm going to continue to believe Obama will win this election.
3 time POTW, member since 2006, MLWTI: 4-3
By all means, feel free to keep ignoring polls and projections.
I love getting downvotes for this. I'm sorry if certain people can't handle opposing perspectives and hard mathematics.
Looks like I am toast. Unless some hail mary comes, which I doubt, congrats on Obama winning. Enjoy living on the government and if you do get off the government payroll, enjoy extremely high taxes. I am looking forward to firing several people tomorrow and pay their unemployment for 20 weeks. Good luck to you all and I will come back in I guess 3 months, maybe longer.
In all seriousness, good on you for honoring that bet, but don't fire innocent people just because Romney loses the election.
If this guy has lost all credibility, you can start getting your information from Dick Morris if you want.
If I'm not mistaken, he got every single state correct. I guess it's true; math and statistics have a liberal bias. Those will complement reality and its liberal bias nicely.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports