In partnership with CBSSports.com
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Good idea. The last four years don't count. K thanks.
Eastern only attempted 6 passes.
No. The past past, not the recent past.
Nigel - You are beating a drum that maybe MSU's run game wasn't so bad last year because it did well against Michigan.
You do know we are talking about how good MSU's run game was because we are trying to predict how much it can improve?
You do realize that the guy who got 167 of those yards is now going to be trying out as a free agent for NFL teams?
You realize that Bell was OWNED by Michigan with a ypc under 3?
Don't point to last year's MSU/UM game to try to argue that maybe MSU's run game wasn't so bad and will be better in the future. Okay?
This post was edited by Peterklima 2 years ago
Ok? The fact is that it’s annoying. We could be having a conversation on the present state of the program, and sure enough a troll comes in and usually say’s something like “you guys can’t compete with MSU, unless you buy some players like Webber”, when its irreverent to the discussion. If we are having a discussion about The Fab 5 then fine, but it gets thrown into conversations for no apparent reason.
Silly me. I thought it was all about the OL vs. the DL (and Hoke and Mattison).
Are you the real CWEBB? Why did you wreck Michigan's program and commit perjury?
Before this goes on and on and on please tell me you all understand that MSU has a ball control type offense and many pass plays have short quick simple routes. Many passes from bubble screens to quick outs even short wheel routes are nothing more than long hand offs.
YOUR have been banned from reading and posting on the Michigan Wolverine board.
If the guys at UMhoops are correct UM is either a 2 or 3 seed and Wisky a 4 for the BTT. Which means we would have to meet OSU in the semi and Wisky would have to be the final. Not that it matters much just thought i would throw it out there.
Not a flame here but one of the events are real and one is all assumption. The rosebowl team is lumped in with the 92 93 shananigans. And trust me it's brought up all the time in any championship team discussion.
In all seriousness. I could give a rats ass about our past or theirs. It certainly helped them this year in landing the sugar bowl and it helped Izzo last year in keeping his NCAA streak alive. But it doesn't score any points for you. My problem with our school is that our FUTURE was always so damn iffy. That's not so anymore
How dare you diminish Michigan's 1906 BigTen Championship. Shame on you.
Wisconsin 3 0 0 1.000 5 0 0 1.000
Minnesota 2 0 0 1.000 4 1 0 .800
Michigan 1 0 0 1.000 4 1 0 .800
Chicago 3 1 0 .750 4 1 0 .800
Illinois 1 3 0 .250 1 3 1 .250
Indiana 0 2 0 .000 4 2 0 .667
Iowa 0 1 0 .000 3 3 0 .500
Purdue 0 3 0 .000 0 5 0 .000
How many B1G titles does Sparty have total in over 60 years? How many does Michigan have since 1990?
Hush Nigel, your stupid is showing.
I'm with you bro. How dare D.Wags not care about the past.
Shout out to the '06 Michigan team!!! Way to handle your business in that one game!!!
This post was edited by NigelUno 2 years ago
What did you think of the performance of that team? How about the other teams? Who did Wisconsin play? I would LOVE your scouting report that shows someone else had a better team.
Not sure if serious.
Iowa ring a bell? Notre Dame this year ring a bell? Alabama ring a bell? Much much much more embarrassing then a 3 point loss to the #1 team in the nation on the road.
But you never answered my question.
MSU has how many B1G titles total? How many does Michigan have since 1990?
You always say we refer to the 1900's. I'm giving Sparty an extra what 40 years, they surely have more right?
Wait even since 2000 Michigan has more then Sparty? 1900's?
But yeh early 1900's where it all happened. Caught us, total frauds. Sparty clearly better.
Be nice. Sparty has beaten some of the best Michigan teams of all time the last few years.
Michigan would have gotten more respect that year if they had loaded up their schedule with traditional powers Beloit, Ohio Normal, Oberlin, and Ohio Wesleyan. As it was they barely squeaked out wins over Ohio and Vanderbilt (and lost to Penn).
Unfortunately, neither Michigan nor Wisconsin were matches for Yale that year.
I meant 1906. Not 2006.
Thought that was pretty clear.
Still not answering my questions.
We won all our games in the 1900's so not sure why you keep dodging.
Who has more B1G titles? Spartans in their 60 or so years in the B1G, or Michigan since 1990?
Just shut up and cut the schtick.
I wonder if you make fun of the founding fathers and the Fourth of July too.
No respect for history. Sad.
That might be an exaggeration.
NO. You got it wrong bro. That was D.Wags that wanted to scrap history.
Love this line. So the John L Smith and Bobby era didn't count either then, right?
"If you're worried about Wolverine fans, just move to Pasadena. You'll never have to deal with 'em."
You don't do exaggeration remember? Keep dodging though Nigel. Question has been asked 3 or 4 times, you have clearly seen it, not sure why you aren't answering.
Spartans are clearly the superior team the 1900's ended. That's when all the magic happened.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports