In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 2071
Online now 1939 Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Every single one of your questions are widely available from CREDIBLE news sources.
Maybe I missed the fake actors part... Explain?
The medical examiner question I do know specifically... I think it was Fox that was arching an eyebrow over his demeanor, etc. They interviewed multiple people, multiple colleagues and professional peers... The answer was that was just his personality. That he freaks out in front of the camera. That he was an excellent ME and probably in a subtle state of shock - given that he had just been doing autopsies on on multiple children.
Like I said, I'm not an expert on the massacre. What was the final report? Was the Bushmaster used or was it not?
I'm not going to refute every single discrepancy. It's all out there on the interwebz, readily available from credible sources. There is not one single credible source, anywhere, that believes this is was a conspiracy or that something squirrely was going on. Not one. And if they thought there was, they'd be cutting each other down with Bushmasters to break the story first.
This is all that I was saying... The only alternative explanation is "conspiracy" and a conspiracy is totally implausible. You, of all people, being military, should know that something like this would take a coordinated effort of too many people to count. And that it would be a clusterfvck from square one. That "opsec" would be absolutely impossible to maintain.
At work so I can't watch a 30 min video, but I will later.
What proof do you have that they weren't killed with the AR-15?
That 5 seconds of footage in the video that shows someone examining a gun in the trunk?
Isn't it strange that this was the only video in the entire clip that wasn't bracketed by 24 hr news and/or Local news news tickers and/or channel insignia? Call me a conspiracy nut, but that seemed awful strange to me.
It almost looks like a fake video to me, or video edited from another source.
Are you really using that 5 second clip as irrefutable evidence over the testimony of a State Medical Examiner and his staff? Or is there something else out there on the Internets confirming that the AR-15 wasn't used? Serious question.
Would appreciate a link.
TURDS ALL UP IN THIS MUG. /// "2010 Auburn Tigers, my favorite team. Unbeaten in all ways." -- Dan Wetzel, April 4, 2013, 6:29 p.m.
And the national media has failed to pick up on this obvious clue because.....
It's a conspiracy by the liberal media to TAKE OUR GUNS. Don't you know?
This post was edited by Mr Perfect 15 months ago
There's no such thing as a "credible" news source.
Danielle Hunter, Jamario Rasco, Anthony FREAK Johnson.. DL wrecking crew of 2013.
This is misleading though. "Credibility" can be nuanced word. Most news sources have particular biases and agendas, undeniable. But taken at their whole, the top news sources in this country are infinitely credible. More so than anywhere on the globe. There are too many, and too varied, and too competitive with each other to be any other way. Meaning they may lean in a particular direction but they aren't going to flat out lie or cover-up anything.
I disagree.. I would agree with you 20 years ago but all media has an agenda and not everything they report is true.
Jmo but I don't trust or give credibility to any news or media place.
On the Bushmaster, I still don't really grasp the issue, but couldn't this just be a media thing?
Your on to something. I just googled "AR-15 removed from Trunk at Sandy Hook", and not a single news cite is found to confirm this. I think Obama either has taken control over the media and the internet.
My guess is Obama has taken over control of Fox News too.
I'm assuming you're a Lib so I figured this was the site that you meant when you said credible. I can find it on any big news site though.
Video on TODAY.com: NBCs Pete Williams reports on the investigation into Adam Lanza.
The guy goes on and on about the one ambulance being blocked off.....but damn there's like 8 in the picture, next to the school as it pans out. (20:50)
crap like that really puts a damper on his argument.
Can someone tell me why there is so much trust in the media and the government?
I mean some people act like there has never been a government cover something up or that there has never been a media source to report false information as fact.
Why is America so different than other countries?
University of Alabama: The high mark of college football since 1892
Of course it would. That's why I keep asking... Do the autopsy reports confirm that it was the .223? In any event, we do have Aurora to point to...
Look the whole gun debate right now is retarded. Obama was never a strong anti-gun proponent. And anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of firearms could do the same damage at that school with a 20-gauge auto and a shoulder bag of shells. Your average hunter could do more damage.
IMO 20 years ago it was way worse. 20 years ago the average person didn't have access to such a broad spectrum of news as we do today. Skepticism is totally warranted, especially if you take your news from only a couple of sources. But if say, the NYT lied about something, the Christian Scientist Monitor would pick it up in three seconds and destroy them five minutes later. And the whole world would know six minutes later.
Why conspiracies in this day and age are impossible. Information is too easily disseminated and too widely available. And that information is worth huge, huge dollars. If say, 9-11 was really a "Bush/Zionist" conspiracy, the NY Post and National Enquirer alone would have cracked that ish in ten minutes.
I watched the video, and all I can say is...
This post was edited by SpurrierOwnsUGA 15 months ago
Can someone please tell me why everything has to be so black and white? Saying that our media is relatively credible does not mean that some news sources don't massage the truth or flat out lie from time to time. But you act is if the media is some uniform monolith that acts in lockstep. They are not and they do not.
Saying that it would be impossible in this day and age to engage in a massive conspiracy doesn't mean that it hasn't happened in the past or our government wouldn't try it going forward.
And please tell me how you know about all these confirmed cover-ups? You know because of the media. And because people cannot keep their mouths shut. How the hell do we know so many operational details about the Bin Laden zapping? Because people want to know. Because the media wants to know. It's a huge story. And they may eff it up in a thousand ways trying to get there, but in the end they generally get it right.
Im not looking for a debate, im just asking a simple question.
Why do so many people consistently refuse to believe these things could happen?
Sometimes I guess I give the people on here more credit than they deserve.
Idk man!! I mean The moon landing was staged! More than 1 person shot Kennedy and dont get me started on Pearl Harbor and 9/11. If any of you believe this was a conspiracy your a dumbass. Could it happen? Prob but did it? No! I feel like this is some headline from Fox News.
Sorry you are saying that you always believe the government and the media, no matter what?
I don't know. I don't know any clear-minded person that uniformly trusts the government or the media. This isn't North Korea. If anything that distrust is about as uniquely American as BBQ and the NFL. That distrust is what our country was founded on. It's why the Bill of Rights exists.
This post was edited by brem22 15 months ago
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports