In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 1833
Online now 2426 Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)
We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.
Where the madness isn't just in March.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Kiffen just screwed another kid.
USC just fired Ty Isaac's primary recruiter, offensive coordinator/RB coach Kennedy Polamalu.
Should have listened to his parents. Don't know how parents can be so oblivious to what was transpiring at USC?
So you are saying that losses mean more than wins? Is that right?
The difference is, they actually beat teams that were worth a damn. After going through a mass exodus of players that included their best offensive weapon , who played for you this year.
You guys are a mess. Get your act together then come back and talk.
Teams such as...?
Top 25 NW and Rose Bowl Wisky. They weren't great, but were better than any win USC had (easily)
And you base that on what?
in reality Bama was simply a better team than both.
w/ a four team scenario...
in 2011 Okie Lite would have had their trousers pushed in.
in 2012 atleast Oregon may have made it out of Rnd1.
as for a USC implosion ? highly unlikely with their recruiting base.
You really believe the PAC is good, don't you?
If you make a decision on where to go to school based on a position coach you are an idiot.
The funny thing with you is that USC lost to UCLA and Stanford, didn't play Oregon St. and Cal lost to OSU. Your examples are crap.
Would change that a little and say any coach, assistant or HC. Unfortunately most of these kids choose or are heavily influenced by their recruiters/coaching staffs.
Utah State finished the year ranked #16 in the AP poll, so again, your example is crap. Both the Big Ten and Pac-12 had 3 teams in the final AP top 25. The Big Ten had two teams in the "others receiving votes" (PSU and Wisky). The Pac-12 had one (UCLA). So I'm not sure how you get that no teams in the Big Ten could finish in the top 6 in the Pac-12. Your arguments are baseless.
BTW, USC was nowhere to be found.
This post was edited by getmyjive11 14 months ago
Who cares how many they signed? USC's started 4/5 star players pretty much everywhere last year and they still stank. The KIff has shown the ability to take diamonds and turn them into turds.
And I'm sorry, but you said that no Big Ten team would finish 6th. Again, there is zero evidence to support that. Just because that is what you think it would be doesn't make it so.
Good luck fielding a team with only 11 guys I guess. Would make a great movie if you guys win a game while doing it.
lolz at USCw fans melting down, nothing better to watch
Last year really hurt a lot of them
I just can't wait till Kiffin is gone so I don't have to hate them anymore, I have always liked the Trojans
fsufsu said... I've got about 10 great stories on Lane but all you need to know is he will never be a loser, that's for sure.
Georgia Tech beat USC too, so what's your point? Why do you keep using teams that USC lost to as an example of how "good" they are? What a joke!
At least we were better than crappy USC. That's indisputable.
lolz, you are so gay
Nittany Ligers? This guy serious? Bro get off the Internet you're setting back humor and possibly the entire human race with these god awful attempts at flames.
You also do a pretty piss poor job at deflecting on everyone else why your program isn't in the shitter. "If we suck, then everyone else sucks in some way, making people forget we suck." I'll reiterate, please get off the Internet. Sell the laptop altogether.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports