Online Now 3168

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1985
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3216
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

DNC 2012 Thread

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Link? Becuase that doesn't sound reasonable at all.

    It's called Google.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Link? Becuase that doesn't sound reasonable at all.

    Why because she is black?

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • TroyTide said...

    It's called Google.

    And also you are leaving out her fathers involvement in the city unions in Chicago, which he was very high up in. So no he wasn't just a pump operator.

    This post was edited by TroyTide on 9/5/2012 at 1:23 PM

    TroyTide

  • CptAUmerica21 said...

    Why because she is black?

    No because a pump operator making $250,000/yr doesnt sound right. Does that sound right to you?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    No because a pump operator making $250,000/yr doesnt sound right. Does that sound right to you?

    See my above post.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    No because a pump operator making $250,000/yr doesnt sound right. Does that sound right to you?

    hell no, especially if they are black.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • CptAUmerica21 said...

    hell no, especially if they are black.

    You also see my above post.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    And also you are leaving out her fathers involvement in the city unions in Chicago, which he was very high up in. So no he wasn't just a plumber.

    I found a salary (which I guess he is an engineer which makes more sense) but it doesnt say for what year so depending on what year it is in 1970 it can range from $140,000 to $240,000 a year.

    So she was solid middle-class in Chicago at the time.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I found a salary (which I guess he is an engineer which makes more sense) but it doesnt say for what year so depending on what year it is in 1970 it can range from $140,000 to $240,000 a year.

    So she was solid middle-class in Chicago at the time.

    thats upper middle class.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I found a salary (which I guess he is an engineer which makes more sense) but it doesnt say for what year so depending on what year it is in 1970 it can range from $140,000 to $240,000 a year.

    So she was solid middle-class in Chicago at the time.

    That would be upper middle class today and especially then. Nice try. She didn't struggle growing up at all. She wasn't rich, but she didn't struggle.

    TroyTide

  • I don't think you understand what it costs to live in a city like Chicago. A household income of $300,000 would not make you upper-middle class. This isn't Alabama where that makes you pretty much a millionaire. She is solid middle-class.

    I'll concede she is stretching it a tad, but her language was vague. She certainly didn't flat-out lie. It's not she lived on the Northside and her parents were millionaires or something.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I don't think you understand what it costs to live in a city like Chicago. A household income of $300,000 would not make you upper-middle class. This isn't Alabama where that makes you pretty much a millionaire. She is solid middle-class.

    I'll concede she is stretching it a tad, but her language was vague. She certainly didn't flat-out lie. It's not she lived on the Northside and her parents were millionaires or something.

    that's upper middle class dude... drop the argument because you are wrong on this one.

    She lied like Paul Ryan did.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • CptAUmerica21 said...

    that's upper middle class dude... drop the argument because you are wrong on this one.

    She lied like Paul Ryan did.

    I conceded already

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I conceded already

    I want full surrender.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    1) Wait. Who said they are only voting for someone based on a speech? Can we not acknowledge a good speech? Voting for someone "cool"? What is this 2008 again?

    2) Pretty much the same as 1.

    3) Would you like to expound upon this very broad, subjective statement?

    4) Obsessing over a nominal number isn't how you are going to solve anything.

    5) You do know this a party convention that is an attempt to differentiate the two candidates right? If neither really is serious about the debt, then how can you differentiate that?

    6) This isn't the worst recovery in all of American historty (really just the last 80 years or so), but that comparison is not apples and oranges and is frankly very fippant. The recession has no equal in terms of complexity (housing bubble, financial crisis, debt crisis [both public and private]). There is no economy in the past that is anywhere near this economy---increased globalization, vastly different welfare-state, the more recent average GDP growth rate is a smaller comparable than the modern average etc. Our current systemic problems are not a product of one politician, but a collective, complex crisis years in the making.

    7) Anecdotal

    8) Ehhh... I agree with your premise, but some of your points are arguable. First off, raising tax rates is not as imporant as offsetting tax cuts (that is the biggest drive of immediate, direct debt via taxes). However, from a fiscal and economic standpoint, tax reform with the purpose of giving long term familiarity would be the best thing to do. I don't think income tax rates are as important to economic growth as corporate and capital gains taxes can be (which would expound upon your point of growing income).

    This is just extra,but I'd like to add that I don't think anyone is saying that we will reduce the whole deficit via "only taxing the rich",. but we don't need to reduce the deficit but cutting taxes for the wealthy and raising taxes on the middle class and poor while not seriously addressing spending cuts. Personally, I'd like to see a 6:1 cut to revenue plan that emphasizes bringing down the third rails instead of non-defense discretionay spending ($900B in cuts [about $200-300B from Health, SS, and Defense] with $150B in raise revenue).

    First off props for actually addressing my argument and not dodging me like barney is doing. At least you recognize that raising taxes is not as important as growing the economy when it comes to raising tax revenues.

    As I said before raising taxes on anyone will not solve anything. And just because we are not raising taxes does not mean that we are raising taxes on the poor. I believe in low taxes for everybody and like you said they should be consistent. The constant up and down is not good for businesses who want to do business in this country. We need to be attracting them not detracting them.

    The best thing we can do is look back at what has worked in the past and one of the best blue prints of bringing an economy back from the brink was Reagan. Obama has done the exact opposite of everything Reagan did. Under Reagan he brought the top marginal tax rate down from 70% to 28%. How dare he lower taxes on those "evil" rich people? You know what the weird thing is though? The poorest quantile flourished under Reagan. Progressive spread the wealth theory (which is what Obama believes in) says that if one person is poor it is because another person is rich. I attached another graphic to prove my point. The Poorest and Median quantiles incomes actually grew when Reagan cut taxes as well as capital gains tax.

    I would still like a better rebuttal on my first graphic about tax revenues being tied to GDP. I feel like you guys are dancing that a little. I also encourage you to go to the numbers yourself. It is important to actually do the work instead of just relying on biased news outlets to feed you one liners. The truth is that Obama should be more focused on providing a better environment for this economy to grow than waging a "war on women" and a "war on people who make more than 250,000.

    I am with you that their needs to be some serious cuts and I will actually provide another graphic on where your taxes actually go. But the person who you are more alined with in that regard is Paul Ryan. He is the one who actually has a BUDGET plan. Obama doesn't even have one. He submitted one just because he is required to by law but he and Reid knew the best thing to do politically is to not talk about cuts with the American people.

    A huge portion of our spending goes to entitlement programs as you will see in the graphic. Now you would think that social security would be funded by the FICA tax right? -nope. Their is very little money in the social security trust fund and that money has been spent elsewhere. So you yourself recognize that there needs to be cuts but do you honestly think Obama will cut anything? Do you honestly expect a president who added 6 trillion in debt in 4 years to make cuts?

    attachmentattachmentattachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    I guess Shane thinks Yeldon will flip to Bama after he enrolls at Auburn. Brilliant. Sell those subscriptions, BOL.” - TIGER

    roll_tide_55

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    well, if you would like a clear explanation of the cause of the financial crisis, go read any of the BOOKS that were written about it.

    stop.

    really.

    you bammers are silly

    dude just stop it. You obviously want no part in an intelligent debate with me. Now go run away with tail tucked between your legs. At least bamalovesfootball will talk specifics with me and not cop out by saying "read books". I have read books on the topic btw. I have read more books on the economy than you have read your entire life so just tell the truth and say you want no part in a real substantive debate. I am done with you. You have proven you have no clue.

    I have no problem with someone having different political views than I do, but at least be knowledgeable about why you have different views. Most of the time the people who are the most enthusiastic about a candidate are the people who know the least (that would describe you). I have a lot more respect for someone if they actually educate themselves on the issues rather than spew what MSNBC tells them is true. An uneducated voter is like a zombie. They meander to the poles and vote a certain way just because that is the way they have always voted, or because that is how they were raised to vote, or because that is the way their friends vote. They don't made decisions for themselves.

    This post was edited by roll_tide_55 on 9/5/2012 at 1:57 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    I guess Shane thinks Yeldon will flip to Bama after he enrolls at Auburn. Brilliant. Sell those subscriptions, BOL.” - TIGER

    roll_tide_55

  • I can't wait to hear about the war on woman tonight. Should be interesting coming from the point of view from an accused rapist who cheats on his wife.

    "People always ask me if I wish I were bigger. I tell them no. I always wanted to be a miniature badass." Dustin Pedroia

    El Guapo

  • El Guapo said...

    I can't wait to hear about the war on woman tonight. Should be interesting coming from the point of view from an accused rapist who cheats on his wife.

    How anyone believes that republicans hate women is beyond me. The "war on women" is one of the biggest jokes that has ever been drudged up. It just continues the victim theme that liberals want to play to. Without victims, the democratic party is nothing so they have to continue to create victims.

    signature image signature image signature image

    I guess Shane thinks Yeldon will flip to Bama after he enrolls at Auburn. Brilliant. Sell those subscriptions, BOL.” - TIGER

    roll_tide_55

  • The plantation party man

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • Smart move downsizing the acceptance speech venue. Would have been awkward.

    signature image

    Mike

  • Thank goodness I'm going to be watching the NFL game tonight so I don't have to watch that trash.

    Jeff4SC

  • Jeff4SC said...

    Thank goodness I'm going to be watching the NFL game tonight so I don't have to watch that trash.

    Don't worry, you can still watch President Clinton speak after the game in the 10 EST hour!

    signature image

    GONIG BUCK

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    ummmmm...

    ok.

    i pretty much don't agree with anything anyone is saying. but you have 2 choices.

    vote to make the rich, richer, which has never "created" anything...

    or,

    vote with the hope that politically, someone else can turn the tide. I really would be interested to see the recovery if Obama had a congress.

    i mean, hell... you know what we should do? we should, as a country, invade something else... use the republican business sow-teat model...

    you all are unbelievably blinded by so much...

    sure, obama's not the answer, but at least he's not the goddamn problem. (that would be you, republicans.)

    Adding additional mouths to the government tit is no way to improve anything. It won't make anyone prosperous and certainly won't "turn the tide" for this country.

    I don't like where the Republican party sits these days any more than the next guy, but if voting Republican means making private citizens more money and voting Democrat means making the federal government more money (through taxes) and then giving it to people who sit on their ass all day, I'll vote Republican EVERY DAMN TIME.

    TideJoe

  • Mike said...

    Smart move downsizing the acceptance speech venue. Would have been awkward.

    facepalm_msu

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • El Guapo said...

    I can't wait to hear about the war on woman tonight. Should be interesting coming from the point of view from an accused rapist who cheats on his wife.

    blank

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba