Online Now 3106

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2398
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3103
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Dems/Liberals I have an earnest Q.......

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    It's just like everything... The sides always argue inane shit when it suits their political purpose

    sooooo tell me, why are the republicans blocking the national id?

    It's all political posturing replete with smoke and mirrors and you partisan retards are dancing like the pied piper's rats

    I was wondering how long it would take for you to join.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • jadennis said...

    First of all, I live in a state that is overrun with just such lawsuits. Even though they have no basis, it's still done just for the opportunity to "settle" out of court with the hospital. I have two very good friends that are medical defense lawyers. They see this exact kind of lawsuit weekly, typically in border towns like El Paso and Laredo. It would cost the hospital "x" amount of money to defend the idiocy of the accusation, so they just settle for less out of court. You're right, no sensible person wold sue for this....unfortunately we're not talking about sensible people.

    And my suggestion would be to provide these ID's at no charge. It would be paid for by tax dollars, therefore the bottom 45% of the nation's earners wouldn't have to pay for it all, directly or indirectly, as they pay no taxes now anyway.

    Let white, male land owners vote? See, this is another common thing that liberals like to toss at conservatives. My idea must be racially motivated, or at the very least full of hate and bigotry, right? It has nothing to do with the simple idea that only U.S. citizens vote in U.S. elections. It must be my deep rooted desire to hold back the poor and the minorities. (even though I suggest providing the ID cards at no expense to them, knowing that my OWN tax dollars are paying for the IDs of those that pay no taxes).

    Even if they do see it regularly, that doesn't mean that liberals believe it's right. Do you guys just ascribe everything you disagree with to liberal philosophy? Just because a couple d-bag lawyers take those cases to get some money doesn't mean that all liberals believe it is that person's right to sue when they would have died otherwise.

    If they're free, I have less of a problem with it except for two things:

    A) How would the poor know where to get these for free? They don't have tvs, let's not forget. It would take a concerted effort and tens of millions of dollars to ensure they know how to obtain these IDs that are free.
    B) You still run into the problem that people have to expend effort to get these IDs. Of course, that makes it less likely they will want to put in that effort. I know, it's depressing that having to put in any form of effort discourages people but it does. Even older people who have expired drivers licenses will balk at having to go get a free ID.

    And you took the whole male land owners thing a bit too far. I was just trying to say the same reasons that keep us from requiring people to own land should keep us from requiring them to pay money for an ID that lets them vote- both would exclude the poor to one degree or another.

    I apologize if you felt I was accusing you of racist motivations in your beliefs regarding voter IDs.

    TalHawkins112

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Voting is a right. Most ID's are given for something that is a privilege. Simplest answer I can give. Edit: oh yea. it must also comply with federal law.

    This is true, however all states issue what is called a "State ID" that is used for identification and is acceptable for voting. This ID has no requirement other than being able to prove citizenship. And since one should be a citizen to be able to vote, this should not be an issue, but for some reason the current administration believes it is.

    MDS00NER

  • fsufsu said...

    My issue is that in the way of clear reason is this malignant cancer called political correctness.

    Our medical, financial, and labor systems are under water to some extent. We have a major illegal immigration issue. If I was president I'd give an awesome speech about my own family's past and how beautiful legal immigration is but then say illegal immigration has created a hole in the nation's pocket and it must be fixed. I'd say everyone must show picture ID to vote because I am not scared that non Americans wont be voting for me.

    I'd also have people show ID to pay their wheel tax. Then if you get pulled over because of expired tags and you're illegal you get deported. IF IF IF you have kids then you and your family can go to or near the front of the line to come back in legally as a tax paying citizen. All illegals in American prisons should be deported.

    Reasonable suggestions not "muddled" by Political correctness

    Oh lord... How much is illegal immigration costing us?

    How are illegals ruining the country? Any facts we can get? Our is this the next hot-button issue the republicans are going to distract everyone with while they sell another pork-laden solution to the sheep while lining their friends'pockets?

    You all sound so stupid... The whole process is designed too be divisive enough to let them keep fucking us from both sides while the "Americans"are distracted like simple minded cats and a laser pointer

    silly, you all are ruining the country in your simpleness while the pageant continues like a professional wrestling plot...

    This post was edited by GoingLightBarny on 3/12/2012 at 1:40 PM

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • aumajorpain said...

    Voting is a privilege. It can be taken away. A "right" cannot be.

    Don't be an idiot.

    Voting is a legal right. It may not be a natural right,but it is a right nonetheless.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • MDS00NER said...

    ... this should not be an issue, but for some reason the current administration believes it is.

    I already stated earlier how the Texas ID bill in question doesn't comply with VRA of '67.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • A right may not under any circumstance be taken away... legally.
    A privilege may be taken away if you prove to be unworthy of it.

    You commit a felony, you can't ever vote again.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • aumajorpain said...

    You commit a felony, you can't ever vote again.

    C'Mon man... Just outright falsehood...

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Voting is a legal right. It may not be a natural right,but it is a right nonetheless.

    His point is that it can be taken away. You can do things to cause you to lose your right to vote. I'm not taking sides on that, but I think that's why he says it's a privileged.

    signature image signature image

    jadennis

  • Ha ha ha the politics of fear are strong in this thread...

    Food for thought: there can be a movement without a god, but never without a devil.

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • bhiley77 said...

    Just because voting is a right doesn't mean it has to be this completely hands-off process by which nobody has any responsibilities. For instance, poll workers don't come to your home and walk into your bedroom and let you fill out your ballot in bed -- you have to go to a polling station. Also, you can't just show up to vote. You have to register in advance. See? Already a precedent for paperwork. By the same token, we're going to need you to do something very basic and get ID. It can be something you fill out and get it in the mail for free, but we need you to do SOMETHING.

    True, but that is something that everyone has to deal with- driving or getting to the nearest place to vote.

    Voter IDs would only be an issue for those without a form of identification- either older people or poor people.

    TalHawkins112

  • aumajorpain said...

    A right may not under any circumstance be taken away... legally.

    You commit a felony, you can't ever vote again.

    Except in Richardson v. Ramirez, the SCOTUS found that the RIGHT to vote could be taken away by states on the basis of "rebellion or other crime". Virginia and Kentucky are the only states that have lifelong denial for felons.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    while they sell another pork-laden solution to the sheep while lining their friends' pockets?

    You're right that is a republican problem. No democrats do that.

    I usually respect what you have to offer in these discussions, but you just accused everyone on the board of following the pied pipers, then you take "pork laden solutions lining friends pockets" and attach that universal political problem to republicans only?

    This post was edited by jadennis on 3/12/2012 at 2:19 PM

    signature image signature image

    jadennis

  • jadennis said...

    You're right that is a republican problem. No democrats to that.

    I usually respect what you have to offer in these discussions, but you just accused everyone on the board of following the pied pipers, then you take "pork laden solutions lining friends pockets" and attach that universal political problem to republicans only?

    We do agree on something. It's both parties' problem.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • jadennis said...

    You're right that is a republican problem. No democrats to that.

    I usually respect what you have to offer in these discussions, but you just accused everyone on the board of following the pied pipers, then you take "pork laden solutions lining friends pockets" and attach that universal political problem to republicans only?

    ja...

    I am talking about both sides...

    Yes, they both do it... The problem is the whole thing, not just one of the halves...

    Is that not clear in my post? Both sides play the pageant to perfection

    This post was edited by GoingLightBarny on 3/12/2012 at 2:01 PM

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • bhiley77 said...

    No. Everybody has equal responsibility to ensure they have identification. Do you think I somehow wasn't inconvenienced to go to the DMV to get a driver's license?

    Sooooo, you are in favor of a national id?

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • TalHawkins112 said...

    Even if they do see it regularly, that doesn't mean that liberals believe it's right. Do you guys just ascribe everything you disagree with to liberal philosophy? Just because a couple d-bag lawyers take those cases to get some money doesn't mean that all liberals believe it is that person's right to sue when they would have died otherwise.

    If they're free, I have less of a problem with it except for two things:

    A) How would the poor know where to get these for free? They don't have tvs, let's not forget. It would take a concerted effort and tens of millions of dollars to ensure they know how to obtain these IDs that are free. B) You still run into the problem that people have to expend effort to get these IDs. Of course, that makes it less likely they will want to put in that effort. I know, it's depressing that having to put in any form of effort discourages people but it does. Even older people who have expired drivers licenses will balk at having to go get a free ID.

    And you took the whole male land owners thing a bit too far. I was just trying to say the same reasons that keep us from requiring people to own land should keep us from requiring them to pay money for an ID that lets them vote- both would exclude the poor to one degree or another.

    I apologize if you felt I was accusing you of racist motivations in your beliefs regarding voter IDs.

    I'll admit that I have preconceived notions about the idea's of liberals....hopefully everyone on here would be honest enough admit that we view conservative and liberal ideas through the perspective of our own personal stance.

    But that doesn't mean I'm incapable of independent thought. I probably posted 40+ posts on AUC, most very long, defending why I thought Alabama deserved to play for the national championship. I shot down what I thought were several irrational arguments against Alabama by most Auburn fans (not winning your conference or your division, no rematch, etc).

    So I can get on board with what I think is a rational idea or argument, even if it benefits Alabama football....or comes from a liberal.

    If someone can get to a job, they can get to a place to get their ID card. If they can get to their local polling station to vote, they can get their ID card. If they can get to a grocery store, they can get their ID card. We aren't asking them to make a pilgrimage across the country to obtain their card in Washington DC.

    And it's not like they'd have to do this on a weekly, monthly, or even yearly basis. A passport is good for ten years (last time I checked, could be different now). I see no reason why the ID card wouldn't be good for at least 8 (two presidential voting cycles). They can get out to get it once and it would allow them to vote quite a few elections.

    And the cost is no big deal. We're running budgets of well over a trillion dollars....we can sacrifice some of those $20 million projects for things like saving a rare beetle in rural San Fransisco or building another library in honor of the Kennedys in order to pay for it.

    Anyway, in the big picture, I just don't think it's that big of a deal. I think allowing non-U.S. citizens to vote in our elections is a big deal. I think solving that issue is not a big deal. If all politics were removed from the discussion, it seems like a worth-while, common sense thing to do. Protect the integrity of who votes for our leaders. Seems simple enough, and I can't figure out why it's so controversial.

    Just do it sensitively. Consider the effects it would have on people and do it in such a way to minimize inconvenience and and negative impact on people's rights, and then just do it.

    signature image signature image

    jadennis

  • bhiley77 said...

    Apples and oranges. The topic at hand is the need to show some form of government-issued ID to vote. People who don't wish to vote don't need to get anything.

    It's always been my belief a driver's license (or the non-driving version) is the de facto national ID. You don't need to have one, but expect serious inconvenience if you don't.

    but how is requiring ID different for the state and the feds?

    i don't understand how that is apples to oranges... changing the address you apply to should not matter, should it?

    i mean, if it is a federal id, you don't have to have one, but expect serious inconvenience if you don't.

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • bhiley77 said...

    No. Everybody has equal responsibility to ensure they have identification. Do you think I somehow wasn't inconvenienced to go to the DMV to get a driver's license?

    But again, for older people who can't drive it inconveniences them more than the average person- and for poor people it does the same.

    That's why it's wrong. It inconveniences some people a lot more than others, particularly those without money.

    TalHawkins112

  • There should be a requirement to prove citizenship to vote, that is really not arguable.

    What IS arguable is whether than ID requirement should be available for free. Right now State ID's cost less than $10 in 22 states (and keep in mind they are generally good for at least 4-5 years.), $10-$25 in 25 states. and $25-$35 in 3 states.... (Oregon, Nebraska and Wisconsin)
    Now if $2-$4 a year is too much OK... I am fine with subsidizing State ID's and making them free, most people would use DL's and the cost of the ID's is minimal, especially when you consider the long term savings realized by solving the other problems.

    BUT it is FUNNY how the 2nd ammendment says that our right to bear arms shall not be infringed... but where are all of you dems on this?? Why should we have to pay for license to carry and pay to register firearms... we are discriminating against the poor here as well... This process depending on what state you live in (if you can own one at all) can cost into the 100's of $, so if $10 is too much for ID to vote, how is this ok?? Oh and by the way I am consistent, this is a right of US citizens, so and ID should be necessary here is well...

    MDS00NER

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    ja...

    I am talking about both sides...

    Yes, they both do it... The problem is the whole thing, not just one of the halves...

    Is that not clear in my post? Both sides play the pageant to perfection

    I did miss that the first time through....but I see you pointed out they're getting us from both sides.....my bad.

    As for all of us idiots.....I remember that little line from Men In Black.....

    Play

    Men in Black - People

    Truth about people as opposed to a person.

    http://www.youtube.com/v/kkCwFkOZoOY
    signature image signature image

    jadennis

  • TalHawkins112 said...

    But again, for older people who can't drive it inconveniences them more than the average person- and for poor people it does the same.

    That's why it's wrong. It inconveniences some people a lot more than others, particularly those without money.

    That's life.

    It's a lot more inconvenient for some of the people that work in our warehouse to get to work. They don't live near by, they don't have a car. So they have to take three different buses to get here and it takes them an hour and a half. They have to leave for work before their kids have to leave for school. They get home three hours after their kids, and can't afford day care.

    Some times your position in life makes things more difficult for you. All these people that can't get their free ID once a decade also have a harder time going to the grocery store, or the doctor, or....anywhere for anything. This is the case whether you're very poor or if you're 95 years old and rich...black or white.

    signature image signature image

    jadennis

  • jadennis said...

    I did miss that the first time through....but I see you pointed out they're getting us from both sides.....my bad.

    As for all of us idiots.....I remember that little line from Men In Black.....

    ha ha ha... that's classic... i forgot about that one... pure classic.

    ha ha ha ha... such nuggets of wisdom in such unexpected places...

    anyways, that about sums up my point.

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • Love you guys, but I gotta get some work done or I'll be one of the poor people that can't get my new free ID card. Later.

    signature image signature image

    jadennis

  • If you can afford a gun,you can afford a license. There is no direct cost to voting. I think that's pretty clear.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba