Online Now 3400

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2460
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3535
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Does Any PAC 12 Team

  • ifinnen said...

    the 2008 OU team (60 pts. a game)

    I always bring this game up when I try to explain this stuff to nimrods.

    I swear, it's as if they don't even remember this game took place.

    signature image

    Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say "YES"!

    andrew32

  • andrew32 said...

    I always bring this game up when I try to explain this stuff to nimrods.

    I swear, it's as if they don't even remember this game took place.

    shrug Selective memory, what are you going to do?

    signature image

    ifinnen

  • Do any SEC teams play offense?

    KeepOnDucking

  • Keep-On-Ducking said...

    Do any SEC teams play offense?

    2006 UF says hello
    2007 LSU says hello
    2008 UF says hello
    2009 Bama says hello
    2010 Auburn says hello
    2011 Bama, Arkansas says hello
    2012...just wait, I just want Oregon to play LSU somehow...that would make my day

    signature image

    ifinnen

  • ifinnen said...

    I doubt you are going to come back and see this...

    but the last two really "dynamic" offenses were the 2008 OU team (60 pts. a game) and the 2010 Oregon offense.

    Magically, when playing real defenses in the championship, they couldn't even get to 20 points. Hmm...

    Oregon is good, but the USC game only proved 2 things. 1. You guys are really fast 2. USC plays no defense, at all.


    Well, since Oklahoma doesn't play in the Pac12, their overrated offense wasn't what I was answering to in this thread, but since you mentioned it, USC's defense did the same thing to OU in 2004, holding them to 19 pts, that after leading 55-10, not winning a close game 24-14 like Florida did.

    Also, your point about Oregon doesn't hold water, because while Auburn did hold Oregon well below their avg, Oregon also held Auburn down well below their average of 40 pts ppg vs the supposed vaunted SEC defenses.
    For both teams it was their 2nd lowest scoring game of the year, and Auburn doesn't score 22 or win without the help several blown calls. Oregon also scored more pts and won by a larger victory margin than any SEC team did in their 48-13 win at Tennessee. Not that Tenn was good, but nobody in the SEC demolished them like that.

    Going by your logic, magically, you could say that when Auburn played a real defense, like Oregon from the Pac, instead of playing the weak defense in the SEC where they averaged over 40 ppg, they could only get a referee aided 22 pts. Auburn avg aprox 43ppg that year, and Oregon vs Pac10 defenses avg 44ppg.

    I agree with what someone said earlier ITT, that USC hasn't played solid defense since 2008. That is very much true.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • Keep-On-Ducking said...

    Do any SEC teams play offense?

    All you need is enough offense to win a national championship

    Something Oregon has never had, not ever roflmao

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • MrWoodson said...

    No.


    You maybe right if you are talking about this year alone, but I would wonder what conference does play any
    defense this year considering-

    The SEC is the so called standard but Texas A&M has navigated the SEC so easily that they are ranked top 15 or close to it and they gave up 57 pts to La. Tech. La Tech not Oregon, and 57 pts is 6 more pts than La Tech averages against the likes of Idaho, UNLV, New Mexico St, Rice etc.

    Ole Miss has a winning record and SEC fans say they are actually good,
    but they gave up 66 pts at home to Texas.
    Georgia a top 10 team? lol gave up 44 pts to a shitty Tennessee team.
    South Car. gave up 44 pts to an anemic offense like Florida although aided by turnovers,
    and 35 to Tenn at home.

    As poor as USC's defense has been, it's still better than anything in the Big Ten.
    About the 10th best team in the Pac 12 scored 28 and lost by only 7 to the best Big Ten team Ohio St.
    Cal couldn't reach double digits vs USC.

    In fact, USC would probably have a top 10 defense this year, if they got to play Big Ten teams all year.
    After seeing UCLA score 36 on Nebraska, and Michigan score 9 pts,
    I think the over/under for Michigan points if they played USC would be 3.
    Not trying to be a dick but Oregon would average 70 pts a game against a conf like the Big Ten.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Well, since Oklahoma doesn't play in the Pac12, their overrated offense wasn't what I was answering to in this thread, but since you mentioned it, USC's defense did the same thing to OU in 2004, holding them to 19 pts, that after leading 55-10, not winning a close game 24-14 like Florida did.

    Also, your point about Oregon doesn't hold water, because while Auburn did hold Oregon well below their avg, Oregon also held Auburn down well below their average of 40 pts ppg vs the supposed vaunted SEC defenses.
    For both teams it was their 2nd lowest scoring game of the year, and Auburn doesn't score 22 or win without the help several blown calls. Oregon also scored more pts and won by a larger victory margin than any SEC team did in their 48-13 win at Tennessee. Not that Tenn was good, but nobody in the SEC demolished them like that.

    Going by your logic, magically, you could say that when Auburn played a real defense, like Oregon from the Pac, instead of playing the weak defense in the SEC where they averaged over 40 ppg, they could only get a referee aided 22 pts. Auburn avg aprox 43ppg that year, and Oregon vs Pac10 defenses avg 44ppg.

    I agree with what someone said earlier ITT, that USC hasn't played solid defense since 2008. That is very much true.

    Auburn rushed the ball 50 times, gained 250+yds rushing, and avg over 5 yds/carry.

    Oregon, also a run first squad, ran 32 times for 75 yds, and 2.3 yds/carry.

    Auburn was 9-17 on 3rd down
    Oregon was 5-15 on 3rd down

    Also 2008 OU was >>>>> 2004 OU

    CRgator1

  • CRgator1 said...

    Auburn rushed the ball 50 times, gained 250+yds rushing, and avg over 5 yds/carry.

    Oregon, also a run first squad, ran 32 times for 75 yds, and 2.3 yds/carry.

    Auburn was 9-17 on 3rd down
    Oregon was 5-15 on 3rd down

    Also 2008 OU was >>>>> 2004 OU

    False, they were close,
    But 04 OU was better

    Alonzo Harris

  • CRgator1 said...

    Also 2008 OU was >>>>> 2004 OU

    Not really, OU in 2004 was undefeated and had Adrian Peterson. The 2008 Sooners lost to Texas by 10 and shouldn't even had been playing in the title game.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    You maybe right if you are talking about this year alone, but I would wonder what conference does play any
    defense this year considering-

    The SEC is the so called standard but Texas A&M has navigated the SEC so easily that they are ranked top 15 or close to it and they gave up 57 pts to La. Tech. La Tech not Oregon, and 57 pts is 6 more pts than La Tech averages against the likes of Idaho, UNLV, New Mexico St, Rice etc.

    Ole Miss has a winning record and SEC fans say they are actually good,
    but they gave up 66 pts at home to Texas.
    Georgia a top 10 team? lol gave up 44 pts to a shitty Tennessee team.
    South Car. gave up 44 pts to an anemic offense like Florida although aided by turnovers,
    and 35 to Tenn at home.

    As poor as USC's defense has been, it's still better than anything in the Big Ten.
    About the 10th best team in the Pac 12 scored 28 and lost by only 7 to the best Big Ten team Ohio St.
    Cal couldn't reach double digits vs USC.

    In fact, USC would probably have a top 10 defense this year, if they got to play Big Ten teams all year.
    After seeing UCLA score 36 on Nebraska, and Michigan score 9 pts,
    I think the over/under for Michigan points if they played USC would be 3.
    Not trying to be a dick but Oregon would average 70 pts a game against a conf like the Big Ten.

    USC is one of the great programs and it became great by playing great defense. Even Pete's best teams, although stocked full of offensive talent, were defensive teams at heart. If USC gets back to playing D like you used to, you will once again dominate the P12. Oregon is stoppable with an elite D (see OSU 2009, Auburn 2010, LSU 2011). But right now no one in the P12 is playing even good let alone great D. Stanford and UW are trying, but they don't have the talent. USC clearly has the talent. It's unfathomable how bad your D is with the talent you have.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by MrWoodson on 11/4/2012 at 6:40 PM

    MrWoodson

  • CRgator1 said...

    Auburn rushed the ball 50 times, gained 250+yds rushing, and avg over 5 yds/carry.

    Oregon, also a run first squad, ran 32 times for 75 yds, and 2.3 yds/carry.

    Auburn was 9-17 on 3rd down Oregon was 5-15 on 3rd down

    Also 2008 OU was >>>>> 2004 OU

    You can run it, you can throw it. It all counts as offense.
    In fact Oregon averaged more ypp, barely.

    Auburn 519 yards/ 85 plays = 6.10 yards per play
    Oregon 449 yards/ 73 playes = 6.15 yards per play

    Auburn 9/18 on 3rd & 4th down
    Oregon 7/18 on 3rd & 4th down

    ================

    Going by your logic here on the post above (although not the full story) I guess you would say that these numbers show Oregon superior to LSU last year.

    LSU 273 yards/ 70 plays = 3.9 yards per play
    Oregon 335 yards/ 82 plays = 4.1 yards per play

    LSU 6 /15 on 3rd down
    Oregon 9/19 on 3rd down

    Penalties
    LSU 5/47 yards
    Oregon 12/95 yards

    hmmmm

    This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 11/4/2012 at 7:04 PM

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    You can run it, you can throw it. It all counts as offense.
    In fact Oregon averaged more ypp, barely.

    Auburn 519 yards/ 85 plays = 6.10 yards per play
    Oregon 449 yards/ 73 playes = 6.15 yards per play

    Auburn 9/18 on 3rd & 4th down
    Oregon 7/18 on 3rd & 4th down

    ================

    Going by your logic here on the post above (although not the full story) I guess you would say something about LSU - Oregon 2011.

    LSU 273 yards/ 70 plays = 3.9 yards per play
    Oregon 335 yards/ 82 plays = 4.1 yards per play

    LSU 6 /15 on 3rd down
    Oregon 9/19 on 3rd down

    Penalties
    LSU 5/47 yards
    Oregon 12/95 yards

    hmmmm

    Damn u make it too easy, lol.

    Oregon- 4 turnovers
    LSU- 1 turnover

    The logic from the Auburn/Oregon gm was that Auburn did what they set out to do. They ran the ball, and stuffed Oregon's run. Your logic was something about the refs and luck. I guess that makes more sense to you.

    CRgator1

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    False, they were close,
    But 04 OU was better

    2008 Big 12
    Mizzu 10-4
    Nebraska 9-4
    Kansas 8-5
    Texas 12-1
    Texas Tech 11-2
    Oklahoma 12-2
    Oklahoma St 9-4

    2004 Big 12
    Colorado 8-5
    Iowa St 7-5
    Texas Tech 8-4
    aTm 7-5
    Ok St 7-5
    Texas 11-1
    Oklahoma 12-1

    CRgator1

  • MrWoodson said...

    USC is one of the great programs and it became great by playing great defense. Even Pete's best teams, although stocked full of offensive talent, were defensive teams at heart. If USC gets back to playing D like you used to, you will once again dominate the P12. Oregon is stoppable with an elite D (see OSU 2009, Auburn 2010, LSU 2011). But right now no one in the P12 is playing even good let alone great D. Stanford and UW are trying, but they don't have the talent. USC clearly has the talent. It's unfathomable how bad your D is with the talent you have.

    I agree with what you say for the most part. Really, I don't think SC's defense is really that talented. CB is a weakness because the returning starter Wiley didn't stay eligible. The best DE USC has is sitting out the year with an injury. The DT and LB's are all pretty much Sophomores. As mentioned above, it's obviously a different team if Jarvis Jones and either Teo or Burfict are playing LB for SC right now. I would say next year will be better, but in 2 years SC defense will be back up to the CPC type standards.

    But again, it's all relative to who you play. Does LSU have a great D? It's good this year, but when you get to play SEC offenses all year it's hard to say. I mean, Towson St, a D1aa school scored more points vs LSU than any of the 5 SEC teams have scored on them this year, and LSU played their starters the whole game.

    Anyway, would I rather have USC's D over Michigan or any other Big Ten team right now? Yes

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • CRgator1 said...

    Damn u make it too easy, lol.

    Oregon- 4 turnovers LSU- 1 turnover

    The logic from the Auburn/Oregon gm was that Auburn did what they set out to do. They ran the ball, and stuffed Oregon's run. Your logic was something about the refs and luck. I guess that makes more sense to you.

    That's not what I'm saying at all.

    You are the 1 who thinks because Auburn ran the ball better than Oregon that somehow means that Auburn's defense was better. Auburn stopped the run but couldn't stop the pass.

    So you are saying that Oregon was better, and played better D vs LSU but lost because they committed 4 turnovers that led directly to 20 pts.

    Ya, I would have to agree

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    That's not what I'm saying at all.

    You are the 1 who thinks because Auburn ran the ball better than Oregon that somehow means that Auburn's defense was better. Auburn stopped the run but couldn't stop the pass.

    So you are saying that Oregon was better, and played better D vs LSU but lost because they committed 4 turnovers that led directly to 20 pts.

    Ya, I would have to agree

    Let me slow this down for you:

    Oregon is a running team. Auburn's strength on defense was their front 7, mainly the front 4.

    Auburn limited Oregon to 2.3 yds/carry. Oregon's best player, by far, was LaMichael James. He had less than 50 yds.

    Putting the gm on the arm of D. Thomas was what the Auburn defense wanted to accomplish.

    CRgator1

  • USC is not playing Trojan defense...but, we historically have had strong defensive teams - we know how to play on that side of the ball. That fact is frustrating the hell out of us right now.

    While an opponent putting up 60+ points on us is so damn embarrassing, I wouldn't be bragging, as they were before the game, if I were a duck fan about our offense putting up 51 on Oregon. They do not have a good defense, therefore, they are not a balanced team.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Hell no son, the Pac 12 hasn't played defense since blacks had to drink from different water fountains

    The south must have gone back to segregated water fountains about 12 years ago then. Man, what a terrible step back for the south. LMAO about "southern defense".

    The truth is since 2000, Pac12 teams have played 53 games vs Southern AQ teams (Including this year)
    ==================================================================================
    PAC.....(32-21) 30.3 points per game vs the southern AQ's.
    South...(21-32) 26.5 points per game vs PAC teams.

    The Pac12 has averaged over 30 pts per game in the 53 games vs southern AQ's during the last dozen years.
    So any time you hear "they play like a southern defense", that justs means they are the 2nd best defense and
    they give up 4 more pts per game than a team from the best coast, the west coast.

    Sorry folks, but no matter how many crystal balls you lick because of your WWF/Nascar-esque rigged BCS standings, the fact remains there are just better overall teams out west who play a combination of offense and defense. Your defenses look impressive because you play each other's inept offenses. If it wasn't true, the Pac12 wouldn't have won 60% of their games and score over 30 per game against southern AQ's since 2000.

    Don't shoot the messenger. It just is what it is.
    It is truth.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    The south must have gone back to segregated water fountains about 12 years ago then. Man, what a terrible step back for the south. LMAO about "southern defense".

    The truth is since 2000, Pac12 teams have played 53 games vs Southern AQ teams (Including this year) ================================================================================== PAC.....(32-21) 30.3 points per game vs the southern AQ's. South...(21-32) 26.5 points per game vs PAC teams.

    The Pac12 has averaged over 30 pts per game in the 53 games vs southern AQ's during the last dozen years. So any time you hear "they play like a southern defense", that justs means they are the 2nd best defense and they give up 4 more pts per game than a team from the best coast, the west coast.

    Sorry folks, but no matter how many crystal balls you lick because of your WWF/Nascar-esque rigged BCS standings, the fact remains there are just better overall teams out west who play a combination of offense and defense. Your defenses look impressive because you play each other's inept offenses. If it wasn't true, the Pac12 wouldn't have won 60% of their games and score over 30 per game against southern AQ's since 2000.

    Don't shoot the messenger. It just is what it is. It is truth.

    NASCAR ain't rigged, meat sniffer.

    signature image

    Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say "YES"!

    andrew32

  • MrWoodson said...

    USC is one of the great programs and it became great by playing great defense. Even Pete's best teams, although stocked full of offensive talent, were defensive teams at heart. If USC gets back to playing D like you used to, you will once again dominate the P12. Oregon is stoppable with an elite D (see OSU 2009, Auburn 2010, LSU 2011). But right now no one in the P12 is playing even good let alone great D. Stanford and UW are trying, but they don't have the talent. USC clearly has the talent. It's unfathomable how bad your D is with the talent you have.

    Coaching. Monte's a legend, but it's about that time. The fat lady has sung.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • NoVaNoles said...

    lmao at these Oregon fans, they really don't get it

    What's your record? You lost to nc state. Ill repeat that nc state. ill repeat it again nc state. Have fun in the pets.com bowl

    Back in Quack

  • usctrojan1 said...

    USC is not playing Trojan defense...but, we historically have had strong defensive teams - we know how to play on that side of the ball. That fact is frustrating the hell out of us right now.

    While an opponent putting up 60+ points on us is so damn embarrassing, I wouldn't be bragging, as they were before the game, if I were a duck fan about our offense putting up 51 on Oregon. They do not have a good defense, therefore, they are not a balanced team.

    Historically you have national titles too....which you live to reminisce. And no...you don't know how to play on the side of the ball

    Back in Quack

  • Back in Quack said...

    What's your record? You lost to nc state. Ill repeat that nc state. ill repeat it again nc state. Have fun in the pets.com bowl

    Ha Ha Ha, how many BCS Titles have Oregon won ? zero, Ill repeat zero, Ill repeat again... Zero

    Have fun with that fact never changing, not ever

    When you give up 600 yards of offense to a 3 loss team, you define pretending wannabes with no dick in their pants

    You looked cute in your flashy uniforms as usual though, congrats for getting something right last night

    This post was edited by NoVaNoles on 11/4/2012 at 11:14 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • andrew32 said...

    NASCAR ain't rigged, meat sniffer.

    Ya I know, I just wanted to troll for a Neck on that one,
    and you won pole position, you pole smoker.

    NcaaAssassinG13