Online Now 2862

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2139
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2795
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Dream Team fanboys get ITT

  • Mr. Perfect said...

    One of the two groups is old enough to have watched hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of games featuring players comprising both The Dream Team and this Olympic team. One of the two groups is not.

    I think its pretty interesting that people that saw the 92 team play, immediately knew how good they were, and there was zero controversy about how it was truly a "Dream Team". There was not a lot of whining from some previous generational fans about how Michael Jordon could not play in another era, and crap like that.

    The quality of that team was universally appreciated. Sheesh, to me the 2012 team is towards the bottom of NBA Olympic basketball teams. Small, not very tough, with a finesse style and not a lot of lock down defenders. They are going to struggle against any team with any sort of front line size. Anyone that can look at that roster and start spouting off about how great they are, when this is a team that struggled all game with an average Argentina squad in an exhibition game. That Argentina squad has exactly one top flight NBA level player on it, Manu Ginobli.

    Oh but the 2012 team scored all those points against Nigeria? Thats why the children of the board are out here claiming some sort of super dominance?

    What a freaking joke.

    AlwaysMore

  • AlwaysMore said...

    I think its pretty interesting that people that saw the 92 team play, immediately knew how good they were, and there was zero controversy about how it was truly a "Dream Team". There was not a lot of whining from some previous generational fans about how Michael Jordon could not play in another era, and crap like that.

    The quality of that team was universally appreciated. Sheesh, to me the 2012 team is towards the bottom of NBA Olympic basketball teams. Small, not very tough, with a finesse style and not a lot of lock down defenders. They are going to struggle against any team with any sort of front line size. Anyone that can look at that roster and start spouting off about how great they are, when this is a team that struggled all game with an average Argentina squad in an exhibition game. That Argentina squad has exactly one top flight NBA level player on it, Manu Ginobli.

    Oh but the 2012 team scored all those points against Nigeria? Thats why the children of the board are out here claiming some sort of super dominance?

    What a freaking joke.

    The Argentina team has as many NBA players on it as the total amount of non USA NBA players in 1992 in the entire Olympics. Kind of puts in perspective the competition level, no?

    Harry Callahan

  • gobigblue21 said...

    I never said Dirk and Bird have the same game. I was telling whoever said that a slow white guy couldn't get his shot off in today's NBA that Dirk and Bird are very similar in that way that they don't wow anyone with athleticism but they get their shots off on anyone with the same old moves no one can stop. Paul Pierce is another great example of this.

    And your reasoning for why Ewing isn't better than Dwight is because Dwight can jump higher? Ya you're not helping anyone on your side of the argument with that statement. Do you think Dwight would just simply jump over Patrick Ewing on every possession? Ewing had a much more polished offensive game. Dwight's has come a long way and is pretty good but still not great.

    I worded it poorly but I think Dwight Howard is close to Ewing. Ewing relied purely on height down the stretch in his career to block shots. His first major knee injury came as a rookie. Just playing all those years with his poor knees was quite remarkable. Someone was talking about athleticism. So yes, I think Dwight Howard is the superior athlete. One can touch the shot clock. The other can no longer touch his toes.

    I'm only out to show that the '92 team was not the end all, be all of NBA basketball. I'm not saying they were bad. I'm saying that they were one of the best USA teams, maybe the best. They aren't worlds ahead of these current players though. People say that this team lacks size. They lack a post presence but they don't lack size overall. They have a consistently big lineup. Chris Paul is the shortest at 6'0 and then you have Deron and Westbrook at 6'3. The remaining players are all over 6'5. Not exactly small but not big down low.

    Harry Callahan

  • Harry Callahan said...

    The Argentina team has as many NBA players on it as the total amount of non USA NBA players in 1992 in the entire Olympics. Kind of puts in perspective the competition level, no?

    No...it puts it into perspective that European players were not coming over to America as much back then.

    It does not change the fact that THIS USA basketball team has played exactly one team with a pulse, and struggled with them quite a bit.

    Small team, with zero post presence and very little toughness. Thats your 2012 USA Mens Basketball team.

    AlwaysMore

  • Harry Callahan said...

    It's absurd how much legends grow long after the fact. If we could ever get the '92 team back in their prime, the expectations would be so ridiculous that they could never live up to their name.

    Remember when Jordan could dunk from the 3 pt line?

    Remember when Reggie Miller could hit half court shots all game long?

    Remember when Bird drove the lane at will?

    Remember when Ewing skied for rebounds? (knees)

    Remember when blah, blah, blah. Nobody, not even Jordan could enter the game today and live up to his name. The older guys (I'm 27 FWIW and remember the Bad Boys, Bulls, Lakers, and Celtics) just can't let it go. This team doesn't even have Bosch, Wade, or Rose. People mention certain guys on Team USA but fail to acknowledge that 3 of the best players in the NBA aren't even on the roster from fatigue/injury yet, we'll make excuses for Shaq. Funny how that works.

    People are comparing Bird to Nowitzki like they have the same game. Lol. Well, they're both white. However, Dirk plays with his back to the basket far, far more. He has a great turn around jumper, doesn't use a hook ever, and rarely brings the ball up the court if ever. Bird was a somewhat crafty player with a great catch and shoot. Oh, and Dirk is 7'0. Different players fellas. But yeah, both are white dudes so yeah...

    Magic would be the closest type player to LeBron. I agree with whoever said that. However, LeBron is in his prime and Magic was in the twilight of his career. LeBron would beat him up. I love me some Magic. I'm a Spartan, but he wasn't the same player in '92 as he was in '82.

    Dwight Howard and Ewing are different players as well. Howard can jump up and touch the shot clock. Ewing would have snapped his knee off trying to do so. Ewing was a great player but he's not Dwight Howard. The best match up would have been Shaq but he was not on the team.

    Like I said, the '92 team just can't live up to the hype. Some of you need to come down from the clouds. The '92 team and 2012 team would likely go 5-5 or so. It would be close. Add Shaq to the '92 team and Wade, Bosch, and Rose to the 2012 team and it probably moves to 6-4 in favor of 2012 squad. That's just my opinion though. Now proceed to call me an idiot to support your argument and continue to match up white players with white players cuz uh, they all have the same game.

    +1 agree with everything.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • Harry Callahan said...

    So you took a single line out of context from everything there. Sweet.

    Explain exactly how 92 ewing was better than 2012 Howard.

    Howard is bigger, faster, can jump higer, averages more rebounds and blocks per game, has been to more all star games, has won defensive player of the year 3 times, has been to the finals (which Ewing hadn't done and both were/are on crap teams.)

    Ewing is a better post scorer.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • AlwaysMore said...

    This is a team that struggled all game with an average Argentina squad in an exhibition game. That Argentina squad has exactly one top flight NBA level player on it, Manu Ginobli.

    Oh but the 2012 team scored all those points against Nigeria? Thats why the children of the board are out here claiming some sort of super dominance?

    What a freaking joke.

    Who did the dream team ever play exactly?

    This post was edited by joetheogre on 8/3/2012 at 7:37 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • joetheogre said...

    Who did the dream team ever play exactly?

    They beat a college all star team by nearly 100 that had G Hill, Webber among others

    That team was better than anybody this years US team has played for sure

    signature image signature image signature image

    LSUNoVa97443

  • LSU-NoVa said...

    They beat a college all star team by nearly 100 that had G Hill, Webber among others

    That team was better than anybody this years US team has played for sure

    They also lost to the same college all star team the day before.

    The article says Daly threw the game, but even with their worst 5 players you figured they would win.

    The Dream Team's Very Bad Day - NYTimes.com

    A new NBA TV documentary chronicles the day college players defeated the Dream Team in a scrimmage--part of Coach Chuck Daly's strategy to motivate the team before the 1992 Olympics.

    offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • I've inquired on this to my real life friends. All of them say anyone that picks 2012 team needs their head examined

    signature image signature image signature image

    Team Targaryen

    MarineMountie

  • joetheogre said...

    Explain exactly how 92 ewing was better than 2012 Howard.

    Howard is bigger, faster, can jump higer, averages more rebounds and blocks per game, has been to more all star games, has won defensive player of the year 3 times, has been to the finals (which Ewing hadn't done and both were/are on crap teams.)

    Ewing is a better post scorer.

    What games is Howard playing in?

    And a 92 Robinson is better than any year Dwight Howard.

    AlwaysMore

  • joetheogre said...

    They also lost to the same college all star team the day before.

    The article says Daly threw the game, but even with their worst 5 players you figured they would win.

    Nice try but more fail from you

    You typed why they lost the day before

    How could they win a game on day 1 of being together with a coach working against them ?

    Keep trying butters

    This post was edited by LSUNoVa97443 on 8/4/2012 at 4:29 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    LSUNoVa97443

  • so i want to get this straight..

    bird was 35 if i remember correctly in 1992, his last year.. he put up 24, 10 and 6 while shooting 50% from the field.. numbers that no 2012 player came close to putting up.. he was too old to compete?

    kobe is 34.. a year younger, looked bad in the playoffs, chucking shots.. he put up 30, 4 and 4.. but he can take on jordan? wtf is wrong w/ people lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    webbi

  • webbi said...

    so i want to get this straight..

    bird was 35 if i remember correctly in 1992, his last year.. he put up 24, 10 and 6 while shooting 50% from the field.. numbers that no 2012 player came close to putting up.. he was too old to compete?

    kobe is 34.. a year younger, looked bad in the playoffs, chucking shots.. he put up 30, 4 and 4.. but he can take on jordan? wtf is wrong w/ people lol

    You must have missed the part that because the 2012 team can jump higher they are obviously better than the 92 team. Then there was a couple of pages about how good Dwight Howard is eventhough he isn't even on the team.

    Big A

  • Harry Callahan said...

    I worded it poorly but I think Dwight Howard is close to Ewing. Ewing relied purely on height down the stretch in his career to block shots. His first major knee injury came as a rookie. Just playing all those years with his poor knees was quite remarkable. Someone was talking about athleticism. So yes, I think Dwight Howard is the superior athlete. One can touch the shot clock. The other can no longer touch his toes.

    I'm only out to show that the '92 team was not the end all, be all of NBA basketball. I'm not saying they were bad. I'm saying that they were one of the best USA teams, maybe the best. They aren't worlds ahead of these current players though. People say that this team lacks size. They lack a post presence but they don't lack size overall. They have a consistently big lineup. Chris Paul is the shortest at 6'0 and then you have Deron and Westbrook at 6'3. The remaining players are all over 6'5. Not exactly small but not big down low.

    Yea I understand where you're coming from and don't lump me in with all the old guys ITT that think the best players of today's day and age aren't worth anything because they play in today's day and age. The game was better back then I agree but to say guys like Lebron and Kobe lack fundamentals or toughness is insane.

    But my point is, to say 2012 could win is really discrediting how good the bigs were on the dream team. Balance is really what's killing the 2012 team it's not that the players are so much worse than 92.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mac1992

  • AlwaysMore said...

    What games is Howard playing in?

    And a 92 Robinson is better than any year Dwight Howard.

    I will take Howard over both. Just my opinion.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • joetheogre said...

    I will take Howard over both. Just my opinion.

    I'd take David Robinson personally, but strictly speaking as a player and not all the off the court BS, you're not necessarily wrong in saying that. They're pretty close. Just wanted to say that before all the old dudes completely overexaggerate how bad Dwight is.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mac1992

  • ilovelamp51 said...

    4 point lead at the half.... Man, these guys are world beaters. blank

    ...but.. but they're the greatest shooting team ever?

    You live by the three, you die by the three. Right now they're dying.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mac1992

  • lithuania tied 2012 team.. that ends the debate of which team is better.. dream team would crush the 2012 team..

    signature image signature image signature image

    webbi

  • This is comical.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Team Targaryen

    MarineMountie

  • webbi said...

    lithuania tied 2012 team.. that ends the debate of which team is better.. dream team would crush the 2012 team..

    To be fair I know it's beating a dead horse but the dream team really never played a team as good as this. In fact they spawned these teams we see today.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mac1992

  • gobigblue21 said...

    To be fair I know it's beating a dead horse but the dream team really never played a team as good as this. In fact they spawned these teams we see today.

    croatia 92 is better than any team not named usa in this years tourny..

    signature image signature image signature image

    webbi

  • gobigblue21 said...

    To be fair I know it's beating a dead horse but the dream team really never played a team as good as this. In fact they spawned these teams we see today.

    Is there a single NBA player on Lithuania? You guys act like basketball didn't exist overseas in 1992 and they just picked up homeless guys off the street.

    The only difference is, they were staying overseas so we never heard about them. They weren't coming to the US to play in the NBA in droves like they are today.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Team Targaryen

    MarineMountie

  • I think we can put the debate to bed. 2012 is probably the 3rd best US olympic team at best.

    If they don't get sharper, they will lose a game, hopefully not in the medal rounds.

    Besides the '92 team being much more talented, the basketball IQ on that team was off the charts.

    BetterOff

  • MarineMountie said...

    Is there a single NBA player on Lithuania? You guys act like basketball didn't exist overseas in 1992 and they just picked up homeless guys off the street.

    The only difference is, they were staying overseas so we never heard about them. They weren't coming to the US to play in the NBA in droves like they are today.

    There's about 6 guys on this team who hbe played in the NBA at some point and I think 3 of them do now. But all of these guys play overseas still as you said and stay over there playing in very good leagues. But international basketball has come light years in the last 20 years and that's a fact. I'm not saying the teams 92 played weren't good but there's just no way any of them were as good as Lithuania, Spain, Argentina, Brazil. Like I said this is a well known thing amongst people who know basketball it really isn't an argument.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mac1992