Online Now 3609

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1982
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3506
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

ESPN 150

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Coker > both of those dudes

    TTTT......aka that's the truth truff

    signature image

    FSUgoNoles24 ●

  • Clarkw267 said...

    You're entitled to your opinion. Browne is easily the #1 QB for me at this point. He has the frame, accuracy, arm... everything you look for. The only thing I would say Browne needs to work on is his footwork. He stays balanced, but he has the Sanchez happy feet. Morris I think has the highest ceiling, but he is still developing accuracy and consistency. He's got a rocket arm and the best footwork of the 3, and has experience under center.

    I'm still waiting for someone to tell me why Browne is so good based on his film. I'll grant that if people have seen him in camps and stuff...I haven't. All I see is his film, and I do see very good things (build, strong arm), but not sure where you're getting the accuracy part.

    Here's what I see out of his film: a QB chucks it deep to a WR who has beaten the DB. I got through about 6:00 worth of that before I closed the video. 90% of his highlights consisted of essentially that same play.

    How can you tell accuracy from that, especially in the short game? I've been waiting for someone to tell me why I'm wrong on this, but nobody has yet. I can see why Browne is considered a good/great QB prospect, but I'm not seeing a 5* prospect here.

    Hackenberg's film is seventeen and a half minutes long, and you get to see a little bit of everything - deep throws, intermediate throws, short throws, out routes, etc.

    I haven't watched Morris' film, so I can't comment on him.

    signature image

    psubills62 ●

  • AtlGator19

  • AtlGator19 said...

    should put the pic of him wreckin that other kid

    signature image

    DPGators ●

  • psubills62 said...

    I'm still waiting for someone to tell me why Browne is so good based on his film. I'll grant that if people have seen him in camps and stuff...I haven't. All I see is his film, and I do see very good things (build, strong arm), but not sure where you're getting the accuracy part.

    Here's what I see out of his film: a QB chucks it deep to a WR who has beaten the DB. I got through about 6:00 worth of that before I closed the video. 90% of his highlights consisted of essentially that same play.

    How can you tell accuracy from that, especially in the short game? I've been waiting for someone to tell me why I'm wrong on this, but nobody has yet. I can see why Browne is considered a good/great QB prospect, but I'm not seeing a 5* prospect here.

    Hackenberg's film is seventeen and a half minutes long, and you get to see a little bit of everything - deep throws, intermediate throws, short throws, out routes, etc.

    I haven't watched Morris' film, so I can't comment on him.

    So you looked at 1 video of each, and decided all of these things? Especially when you are watching a video that is 3 times the length of the other one?

    Browne is quicker in his drops, is more consistent with his throwing mechanics, and is better at progressing through reads and making decisions. He's also better at escaping the rush, re-setting and making an accurate throw.

    You're more than welcome to disagree, but I really don't think you've seen enough of both guys to make the comparison fairly.

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267

  • Just scanned the list looks like tamu, Michigan, and uf had lots of guys on there!

    signature image

    FLOBama

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    Lmao at Browne being above Morris on every single site. How mad Michigan fans?

    Don't care at all. They're only rankings

    signature image signature image signature image

    J Wil23 ●

  • CHAMPCHIZIK said...

    Lawson at 5 is brave

    brave is far from the word i would chose for it .

    Crimson_Ghost ●

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    brave is far from the word i would chose for it .

    I, for one, am shocked you feel that way.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TURDS ALL UP IN THIS MUG. /// "2010 Auburn Tigers, my favorite team. Unbeaten in all ways." -- Dan Wetzel, April 4, 2013, 6:29 p.m.

    Mr Perfect ●

  • Another year of devalued CA players.

    Luginbill for the past 3-4 years or so has been saying that Georgia is better at producing top football talent than CA.

    Last year in the NFL CA 211 players, Georgia 80. CA led all states.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Another year of devalued CA players.

    Luginbill for the past 3-4 years or so has been saying that Georgia is better at producing top football talent than CA.

    Last year in the NFL CA 211 players, Georgia 80. CA led all states.

    So what is the per capita of those numbers?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba ●

  • Bo Knows said...

    I, for one, am shocked you feel that way.

    lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    So what is the per capita of those numbers?

    Per Capita is irrelevant. If you wanted to make a per capita argument, then you really should only use High School Varsity football players as the population numnber.

    Anyway per capita America Samoa is better than everyone, but nobody is going to argue that America Samoa is a better talent producing area than CA, FL, or TX.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    Lmao at Browne being above Morris on every single site. How mad Michigan fans?

    They clearly forgot to factor in Sugar Shane's recruiting prowess.

    This post was edited by MrWoodson on 4/17/2012 at 5:59 PM

    MrWoodson ●

  • Crimson_Ghost said...
    brave is far from the word i would chose for it .

    Bo Knows said...
    I, for one, am shocked you feel that way.

    ESPN ranking system = juggle

    come on man watch the tapes .
    - good prospect ? yes
    - top ten ? maybe top ten among his position.

    Crimson_Ghost ●

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Saw the amount of Michigan players

    Got sick to stomach

    Decided to post and tell all of us

    roflmao

    buttesnake

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    ESPN ranking system = juggle

    come on man watch the tapes . - good prospect ? yes - top ten ? maybe top ten among his position.

    Don't forget the under armor bump. If a prospect chooses to play in the underarmor game over the Army game, then that is worth a good 10-20 spot bump.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • CFBLive did a whole segment pumping Elite 11 and Dilfer today...

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba ●

  • Not enough Bama commits.

    List is invalid

    Twitter: @ProducerAP

    Theta

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Per Capita is irrelevant. If you wanted to make a per capita argument, then you really should only use High School Varsity football players as the population numnber.

    Anyway per capita America Samoa is better than everyone, but nobody is going to argue that America Samoa is a better talent producing area than CA, FL, or TX.

    This

    Alonzo Harris ●

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    Lmao at Browne being above Morris on every single site. How mad Michigan fans?

    fishing

    buttesnake

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Per Capita is irrelevant. If you wanted to make a per capita argument, then you really should only use High School Varsity football players as the population numnber.

    Anyway per capita America Samoa is better than everyone, but nobody is going to argue that America Samoa is a better talent producing area than CA, FL, or TX.

    Ok then use that as the population sample, but it will still be a more reasonable statistic figure given the population proportion of the state even if the standard deviation is high on high school varsity number.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba ●

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Ok then use that as the population sample, but it will still be a more reasonable statistic figure given the population proportion of the state even if the standard deviation is high on high school varsity number.

    nerd

    buttesnake

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Ok then use that as the population sample, but it will still be a more reasonable statistic figure given the population proportion of the state even if the standard deviation is high on high school varsity number.

    It doesn't change the fact that CA produces substantially more NFL talent than GA, hence they should have substantially more kids than GA on this list. These rankings aren't per capita, they are who are the best prospects overall.

    Alonzo Harris ●

  • Isn't the list of HS talent, not NFL talent.... and who really cares if there is more from one state.... really silly argument.... it is all opinion based anyway... just a guess of who is better...

    signature image

    FSUgoNoles24 ●

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports