Online Now 3316

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1899
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3322
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Enough with the Sandusky BS

  • simply put if you think he is going to somehow be found not guilty on enough charges that he spends any time outside of a PA state prison after a verdict or that psu fans want him to be found not guilty you're seriously mentally retarded

    -signed the super majority of PSU fans

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by ejb5212 on 6/22/2012 at 12:28 PM

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • ejb5212 said...

    simply put if you think he is going to somehow be found not guilty on enough charges that he spends any time outside of a PA state prison after a verdict or that psu fans want him to be found not guilty you're seriously mentally retarded

    -signed the entire PSU fan base

    I agree. It is wonderful when everyone becomes an expert on everything when all they know is a 15 second blip from ESPN.

    It is the same with NCAA violations. If they are on your school, they are always unfair and too harsh. If they are on another school, they got away with murder.

    Everyone has an agenda..........but none of their opinions really matter, nor has their lives actually been affected by the situation.

    There are more people that care more that some recruit is going to come to their school instead of Penn St in this matter than there are people that really care about whether or not the justice system works.

    This post was edited by BetterOff on 6/22/2012 at 11:30 AM

    BetterOff

  • ejb5212 said...

    or that psu fans want him to be found not guilty

    there are definitely psu fans that don't think he's guilty. head over to the scout and rivals psu boards.

    http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?SID=890&fid=36&style=2&tid=155729461&Page=3
    Quote:
    The one thing that bothered me in McQueary's story is that all he heard was what "might have been" skin on skin slapping. To me, that easily could have been splashes of water cascading off their bodies and hitting the tile below. The sound is eerily similar as I noticed while showering at the gym today. Throw in the echo factor of a large, empty gym shower!

    If a full grown adult male was anally raping a ten year old boy, I would assume that there would be screaming. I'd assume that there would also be blood.

    I'm going to be blunt about this, but if Sandusky could not fit, then you must acquit.

    Quote:
    When you consider that JS is a pretty tall guy, and the average 10 year old is 4.25 feet tall, and the boy was standing with his hands on the wall, I'm having a difficult time believing anal sex was taking place between the two.

    I suspect JA will raise this in his defense.

    Quote:
    if a kids getting raped, youd see blood and hear screams. mm didnt say he saw nor heard any....free js!

    from scout:
    Quote:
    I didnt say it was right. I didnt say it was appropriate. As for the shower...now we go back to the YMCA argument. According to the testimony they were chest to chest. Again....I didnt say it was right...just asking what law was broken.

    Quote:
    So then you really cant point out what applies in terms of that victim. You cut and paste from a law book but cant point out to me what was testified to? Again, of the list that you posted, what law was broken? You provided the list, so back it up. Jeez...I hope you and GOB arent related...Thanksgiving dinners would absolutely ****.

    Quote:
    Taking a shower with a kid in the middle of the night is not against the law. That is all I am saying.

    roger huerta ●

  • roger huerta said...

    there are definitely psu fans that don't think he's guilty. head over to the scout and rivals psu boards.

    http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?SID=890&fid=36&style=2&tid=155729461&Page=3 Quote: The one thing that bothered me in McQueary's story is that all he heard was what "might have been" skin on skin slapping. To me, that easily could have been splashes of water cascading off their bodies and hitting the tile below. The sound is eerily similar as I noticed while showering at the gym today. Throw in the echo factor of a large, empty gym shower!

    If a full grown adult male was anally raping a ten year old boy, I would assume that there would be screaming. I'd assume that there would also be blood.

    I'm going to be blunt about this, but if Sandusky could not fit, then you must acquit.

    Quote: When you consider that JS is a pretty tall guy, and the average 10 year old is 4.25 feet tall, and the boy was standing with his hands on the wall, I'm having a difficult time believing anal sex was taking place between the two.

    I suspect JA will raise this in his defense.

    Quote: if a kids getting raped, youd see blood and hear screams. mm didnt say he saw nor heard any....free js!

    from scout: Quote: I didnt say it was right. I didnt say it was appropriate. As for the shower...now we go back to the YMCA argument. According to the testimony they were chest to chest. Again....I didnt say it was right...just asking what law was broken.

    Quote: So then you really cant point out what applies in terms of that victim. You cut and paste from a law book but cant point out to me what was testified to? Again, of the list that you posted, what law was broken? You provided the list, so back it up. Jeez...I hope you and GOB arent related...Thanksgiving dinners would absolutely ****.

    Quote: Taking a shower with a kid in the middle of the night is not against the law. That is all I am saying.

    And there are plenty of PSU fans that think he is guilty as well.

    There are plenty of people outside of PSU that probably share some of those opinions that they shared. Everyone is allowed to have an opinion on the matter and it is only natural that those closer to the issue are going to have more varying opinions than those removed from the situation.

    Again, the only opinions that really matter though are the 12 people in the courtroom.

    BetterOff

  • roger huerta said...

    there are definitely psu fans that don't think he's guilty. head over to the scout and rivals psu boards.

    http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?SID=890&fid=36&style=2&tid=155729461&Page=3
    Quote:
    The one thing that bothered me in McQueary's story is that all he heard was what "might have been" skin on skin slapping. To me, that easily could have been splashes of water cascading off their bodies and hitting the tile below. The sound is eerily similar as I noticed while showering at the gym today. Throw in the echo factor of a large, empty gym shower!

    If a full grown adult male was anally raping a ten year old boy, I would assume that there would be screaming. I'd assume that there would also be blood.

    I'm going to be blunt about this, but if Sandusky could not fit, then you must acquit.

    Quote:
    When you consider that JS is a pretty tall guy, and the average 10 year old is 4.25 feet tall, and the boy was standing with his hands on the wall, I'm having a difficult time believing anal sex was taking place between the two.

    I suspect JA will raise this in his defense.

    Quote:
    if a kids getting raped, youd see blood and hear screams. mm didnt say he saw nor heard any....free js!

    from scout:
    Quote:
    I didnt say it was right. I didnt say it was appropriate. As for the shower...now we go back to the YMCA argument. According to the testimony they were chest to chest. Again....I didnt say it was right...just asking what law was broken.

    Quote:
    So then you really cant point out what applies in terms of that victim. You cut and paste from a law book but cant point out to me what was testified to? Again, of the list that you posted, what law was broken? You provided the list, so back it up. Jeez...I hope you and GOB arent related...Thanksgiving dinners would absolutely ****.

    Quote:
    Taking a shower with a kid in the middle of the night is not against the law. That is all I am saying.

    Wow

    Aussie

  • I know a PSU fan who thinks he isn't guilty and thinks they should name the shower after him.

    "People always ask me if I wish I were bigger. I tell them no. I always wanted to be a miniature badass." Dustin Pedroia

    El Guapo

  • roger huerta said...

    there are definitely psu fans that don't think he's guilty. head over to the scout and rivals psu boards.

    http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?SID=890&fid=36&style=2&tid=155729461&Page=3 Quote: The one thing that bothered me in McQueary's story is that all he heard was what "might have been" skin on skin slapping. To me, that easily could have been splashes of water cascading off their bodies and hitting the tile below. The sound is eerily similar as I noticed while showering at the gym today. Throw in the echo factor of a large, empty gym shower!

    If a full grown adult male was anally raping a ten year old boy, I would assume that there would be screaming. I'd assume that there would also be blood.

    I'm going to be blunt about this, but if Sandusky could not fit, then you must acquit.

    Quote: When you consider that JS is a pretty tall guy, and the average 10 year old is 4.25 feet tall, and the boy was standing with his hands on the wall, I'm having a difficult time believing anal sex was taking place between the two.

    I suspect JA will raise this in his defense.

    Quote: if a kids getting raped, youd see blood and hear screams. mm didnt say he saw nor heard any....free js!

    from scout: Quote: I didnt say it was right. I didnt say it was appropriate. As for the shower...now we go back to the YMCA argument. According to the testimony they were chest to chest. Again....I didnt say it was right...just asking what law was broken.

    Quote: So then you really cant point out what applies in terms of that victim. You cut and paste from a law book but cant point out to me what was testified to? Again, of the list that you posted, what law was broken? You provided the list, so back it up. Jeez...I hope you and GOB arent related...Thanksgiving dinners would absolutely ****.

    Quote: Taking a shower with a kid in the middle of the night is not against the law. That is all I am saying.

    You do understand that they are talking about whether Sandusky would be found guilty of raping ONE VICTIM (#2) from A LEGAL STANDPOINT. Follow the whole damn thread, they are talking about legal strategies and analysis.

    getmyjive11

  • roger huerta said...

    there are definitely psu fans that don't think he's guilty. head over to the scout and rivals psu boards.

    http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?SID=890&fid=36&style=2&tid=155729461&Page=3
    Quote:
    The one thing that bothered me in McQueary's story is that all he heard was what "might have been" skin on skin slapping. To me, that easily could have been splashes of water cascading off their bodies and hitting the tile below. The sound is eerily similar as I noticed while showering at the gym today. Throw in the echo factor of a large, empty gym shower!

    If a full grown adult male was anally raping a ten year old boy, I would assume that there would be screaming. I'd assume that there would also be blood.

    I'm going to be blunt about this, but if Sandusky could not fit, then you must acquit.

    Quote:
    When you consider that JS is a pretty tall guy, and the average 10 year old is 4.25 feet tall, and the boy was standing with his hands on the wall, I'm having a difficult time believing anal sex was taking place between the two.

    I suspect JA will raise this in his defense.

    Quote:
    if a kids getting raped, youd see blood and hear screams. mm didnt say he saw nor heard any....free js!

    from scout:
    Quote:
    I didnt say it was right. I didnt say it was appropriate. As for the shower...now we go back to the YMCA argument. According to the testimony they were chest to chest. Again....I didnt say it was right...just asking what law was broken.

    Quote:
    So then you really cant point out what applies in terms of that victim. You cut and paste from a law book but cant point out to me what was testified to? Again, of the list that you posted, what law was broken? You provided the list, so back it up. Jeez...I hope you and GOB arent related...Thanksgiving dinners would absolutely ****.

    Quote:
    Taking a shower with a kid in the middle of the night is not against the law. That is all I am saying.

    Yeah and some people think that the government did 9/11 yet a majority of us know it was just pissed off terrorists....

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • ejb5212 said...

    Yeah and some people think that the government did 9/11 yet a majority of us know it was just pissed off terrorists....

    "-signed the entire PSU fan base"

    You should change your op then.

    MildReTIDEation

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    "-signed the entire PSU fan base"

    You should change your op then.

    Lulz you guys are r-worded

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • getmyjive11 said...

    You do understand that they are talking about whether Sandusky would be found guilty of raping ONE VICTIM (#2) from A LEGAL STANDPOINT. Follow the whole damn thread, they are talking about legal strategies and analysis.

    if i felt like it, i could go back and pull thread after thread after thread that supported sandusky and joe pa simply because they are penn state through and through. they aren't hard to find. i don't know about other fanbases or websites, but we've got a 6500 post thread going on shaggybevo documenting this whole episode from day 1. yes, we were the ones who sent pedobear to your bowl game.

    there are plenty of blind homers in every fanbase. if mack brown killed kittens live and in color on abc at halftime of the tx-ou game, you'd have longhorns that swore up and down it didn't happen and it was all a sooner conspiracy led by barry switzer. i would hope that the majority of psu fans are as disgusted by this as everyone else, but as in all cases, the ugly minority is what gets seen/heard.

    roger huerta ●

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    "-signed the entire PSU fan base"

    You should change your op then.

    that was kind of my point.

    roger huerta ●

  • ejb5212 said...

    Lulz you guys are r-worded

    You are contradicting yourself. That is all I pointed out. It's not like I think you want Sandusky to go free.

    This post was edited by MildReTIDEation on 6/22/2012 at 12:18 PM

    MildReTIDEation

  • El Guapo said...

    I know a PSU fan who thinks he isn't guilty and thinks they should name the shower after him.

    fingergun

    Yeah, I said it.

    shalvoy

  • roger huerta said...

    that was kind of my point.

    I know.

    MildReTIDEation

  • ejb5212 said...

    simply put if you think he is going to somehow be found not guilty on enough charges that he spends any time outside of a PA state prison after a verdict or that psu fans want him to be found not guilty you're seriously mentally retarded

    -signed the entire PSU fan base

    I'm not trying to be combative here, but the psu fan base will have to deal with this for many years to come. People aren't just going to sweep this under the rug and not speak about it. Sandusky deserves the worst punishment Jeffrey dahmer could ever imagine.

    I don't think it is up to you to speak for your fan base as a whole. I wish nothing but the best for psu going forward. I hope that once a decision is made conversation about it slows down. I guess you have to have faith in our justice system at times like this. That being said you aren't going to stop people from speculating about the outcome of the trial, and what they feel the sentence should be.

    No one made you open the threads. If you don't want to see what people on this board are saying, don't read the thread.

    Good luck to psu going forward.

    This post was edited by WintersComing on 6/22/2012 at 12:21 PM

    WintersComing

  • roger huerta said...

    if i felt like it, i could go back and pull thread after thread after thread that supported sandusky and joe pa simply because they are penn state through and through. they aren't hard to find. i don't know about other fanbases or websites, but we've got a 6500 post thread going on shaggybevo documenting this whole episode from day 1. yes, we were the ones who sent pedobear to your bowl game.

    there are plenty of blind homers in every fanbase. if mack brown killed kittens live and in color on abc at halftime of the tx-ou game, you'd have longhorns that swore up and down it didn't happen and it was all a sooner conspiracy led by barry switzer. i would hope that the majority of psu fans are as disgusted by this as everyone else, but as in all cases, the ugly minority is what gets seen/heard.

    Okay, find me the threads that support Sandusky. And by support I mean things like "geez, they are really screwing JS over" or "I hope is he found not guilty on all the charges!". Something like "there isn't enough evidence to support a conviction on this charge" is not supporting Sandusky. I don't think you understand the difference.

    getmyjive11

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Okay, find me the threads that support Sandusky. And by support I mean things like "geez, they are really screwing JS over" or "I hope is he found not guilty on all the charges!". Something like "there isn't enough evidence to support a conviction on this charge" is not supporting Sandusky. I don't think you understand the difference.

    Is there enough evidence to convict JoePa post mortem is the real question. JK

    This post was edited by MildReTIDEation on 6/22/2012 at 12:28 PM

    MildReTIDEation

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    Is there enough evidence to convict JoePa post mortem is the real question.

    Not right now. Maybe after the Spanier emails are revealed. If that is the case, you can all piss on his grave... I would have no problem with that.

    getmyjive11

  • ejb5212 said...

    simply put if you think he is going to somehow be found not guilty on enough charges that he spends any time outside of a PA state prison after a verdict or that psu fans want him to be found not guilty you're seriously mentally retarded

    -signed the entire PSU fan base

    Hey, we don't know how you guys will react. The way your students rioted after all this stuff went down makes you guys look, well, not good to put it mildly.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Not right now. Maybe after the Spanier emails are revealed. If that is the case, you can all piss on his grave... I would have no problem with that.

    I wasn't being serious.

    MildReTIDEation

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    I wasn't being serious.

    But I was. shrug

    getmyjive11

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Okay, find me the threads that support Sandusky. And by support I mean things like "geez, they are really screwing JS over" or "I hope is he found not guilty on all the charges!". Something like "there isn't enough evidence to support a conviction on this charge" is not supporting Sandusky. I don't think you understand the difference.

    no, i really don't understand the difference. anyone who doesn't think there is enough evidence to convict is a blind homer. and yes, i get that there are 48 charges so if you want to get nit-picky and single out one weak charge, congrats on your "moral" victory.

    and i'd say it's safe to assume joyce porter is a penn state fan, being a resident of state college for 40+ years.

    roger huerta ●

  • roger huerta said...

    no, i really don't understand the difference. anyone who doesn't think there is enough evidence to convict is a blind homer. and yes, i get that there are 48 charges so if you want to get nit-picky and single out one weak charge, congrats on your "moral" victory.

    and i'd say it's safe to assume joyce porter is a penn state fan, being a resident of state college for 40+ years.

    You do understand that people can say that he will be found not guilty of some charges and guilty of others based on the evidence and testimony? Because that is what you will find on the PSU boards, and it is a consistent thought. I'm not sure why you think that is being a "blind homer".

    Joyce Porter is Jerry's longtime (4 decades) friend. Linked is a story about her. Note that it says Sandusky's group of supporters is 6-10 people and they are made up of friends and family. That is what you want to judge the State College and PSU community on?

    Rube.

    THE MISGUIDED “SANDUSKY” LOYALS OF STATE COLLEGE | THE WORD WARRIOR Bonju Blog on WordPress.com

    JERRY SANDUSKY is a

    bonjupatten.com

    getmyjive11

  • getmyjive11 said...

    That is what you want to judge the State College and PSU community on?

    christalmighty. banghead

    you're playing a game of absolutes, yet want exceptions. holy hell.

    roger huerta ●

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports