Online Now 2923

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1493
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2953
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

FSU vs USC

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Your failure to understand me is a backpedal ?

    The rest is just your standard bullshit, not even responding to it

    Barkley is a great QB that certainly isn't great yet. Those are your words, not mine. lol

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • Action Figure said...

    Barkley is a great QB that certainly isn't great yet. Those are your words, not mine. lol

    You took out of context what I was saying in two different posts, Im so sorry I wasn't more clear since you seem to care so deeply

    When I said he wasn't great yet I just meant he hasn't accomplished anything and he hasn't, but keep harping on that

    Fact is Barkley is nothing more than a NFL prospect who might pan out, might not.... he hasn't proven much else outside of scouts liking his skills for the next level, that doesn't make a QB that special imo.... Ponder comes to mind among many others

    Nobody cares but you, and that is cause you reach so hard to find anything to bash me with

    Again, I apologize for not typing shit out perfectly this early in the morning

    This post was edited by NoVaNoles on 5/16/2012 at 5:02 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    You took out of context what I was saying in two different posts, Im so sorry I wasn't more clear since you seem to care so deeply

    When I said he wasn't great yet I just meant he hasn't accomplished anything and he hasn't, but keep harping on that

    Fact is Barkley is nothing more than a NFL prospect who might pan out, might not.... he hasn't proven much else outside of scouts liking his skills for the next level, that doesn't make a QB that special imo.... Ponder comes to mind among many others

    Nobody cares but you, and that is cause you reach so hard to find anything to bash me with

    Again, I apologize for not typing shit out perfectly this early in the morning

    I didn't take anything out of context. You're just a clown that happens to be a SC hater as well. It is what it is, no big deal. You try to short change Woods and Lee by saying their stats are because they have a great QB in Barkley. Then, not even an hour later, you say Barkley certainly isn't great. Your hating ass can't help yourself.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • Jenkins is a great DE that certainly isn't great and Rhodes is a great CB that certainly isn't great.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • Action Figure said...

    I didn't take anything out of context. You're just a clown that happens to be a SC hater as well. It is what it is, no big deal. You try to short change Woods and Lee by saying their stats are because they have a great QB in Barkley. Then, not even an hour later, you say Barkley certainly isn't great. Your hating ass can't help yourself.

    I think my daughter in law needs to look for new work, because she completely whiffed on how messed up this cat is.

    I think his main problem, besides his Latent Homoitis, is that he and his Stoogey friends pretty
    Much had the run of this board for over a year and it was their own private Kindergarten/Frat Boy circle jerk.

    They did what they wanted, said what they wanted and no adults were around to stop the monkey business

    Now, the grownups are here, and he really doesn't know how to deal with it

    It's kind of cute actually

    BlemBlam3

  • roflmao

    "might be" and "could be's"

    Some one who hasn't had a catch yet looks like he might be the best WR in college football? Looks like? Have to be kidding me.

    Comedy.

    signature image

    ProUSC

  • ProUSC said...

    roflmao

    "might be" and "could be's"

    Some one who hasn't had a catch yet looks like he might be the best WR in college football? Looks like? Have to be kidding me.

    Comedy.

    And he could be the next Calvin Johnson, even though their 40 times are like the difference between the men's and women's Tees in Golf

    BlemBlam3

  • ProUSC said...

    roflmao

    "might be" and "could be's"

    Some one who hasn't had a catch yet looks like he might be the best WR in college football? Looks like? Have to be kidding me.

    Comedy.

    lol

    Production is overrated. As long as a player looks talented, that's all that matters.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • ProUSC said...

    roflmao

    "might be" and "could be's"

    Some one who hasn't had a catch yet looks like he might be the best WR in college football? Looks like? Have to be kidding me.

    Comedy.

    And yet you only have 2 kids with more than 4 career catches yet you have the better and deeper unit right ?

    Talk about comedy

    Nearly your entire WR core has proven jack shit, unlike FSU who has 6 kids that have gone over 400 yards in a season

    USC has 2

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • BlemBlam3 said...

    And he could be the next Calvin Johnson, even though their 40 times are like the difference between the men's and women's Tees in Golf

    lulz what 40 are you talking about ? kid hasn't even run one at FSU

    every DB we have say he is incredibly fast, and a 40 time means shit anyways but of course your old ass doesn't realize

    Football speed matters most and Benjamin is certainly fast enough... why do you think he doesn't play TE smartass ?

    This post was edited by NoVaNoles on 5/16/2012 at 7:15 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    And yet you only have 2 kids with more than 4 career catches yet you have the better and deeper unit right ?

    Talk about comedy

    Nearly your entire WR core has proven jack shit, unlike FSU who has 6 kids that have gone over 400 yards in a season

    USC has 2

    Well both went over 1,000 last season. How many FSU receivers went over 1,000? 1,000 yards is a common benchmark used, I have never heard of a benchmark of 400 yards before.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Well both went over 1,000 last season. How many FSU receivers went over 1,000? 1,000 yards is a common benchmark used, I have never heard of a benchmark of 400 yards before.

    Those were the only 2 WR's you threw to unless inside the redzone

    Their yardage means nothing to me cause our kids were younger, we lost our best WR for the season in fall camp

    And lost our starting QB for a few games, no shit our passing numbers were worse

    Doesn't mean your WR's are better or that they will continue to be just cause of stats from last year

    We also were terrible in sacks given up, but that doesn't hurt the passing right ?

    All I know is Greene had a better freshman season than Woods in less game on a worse team

    I have said your top 2 are the best, but they don't make a whole unit and its closer than any of you homers think

    Greene and Benjamin are special talents too

    This post was edited by NoVaNoles on 5/16/2012 at 7:22 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Well both went over 1,000 last season. How many FSU receivers went over 1,000? 1,000 yards is a common benchmark used, I have never heard of a benchmark of 400 yards before.

    Who needs a 1000 yard receiver.... those guys are useless

    signature image

    FSUgoNoles24

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Well both went over 1,000 last season. How many FSU receivers went over 1,000? 1,000 yards is a common benchmark used, I have never heard of a benchmark of 400 yards before.

    At the end of the day, both Woods and Lee are great WRs that certainly aren't great yet IYAM.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • Action Figure said...

    At the end of the day, both Woods and Lee are great WRs that certainly aren't great yet IYAM.

    using the same material over and over again as usual

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    using the same material over and over again as usual

    You know the drill. Besides, ”great, but certainly isn't great” is classic stuff.

    Sidenote: I thought you were done with FSU and college football in general. What are you still doing here? lol

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • Action Figure said...

    You know the drill. Besides, ”great, but certainly isn't great” is classic stuff.

    Sidenote: I thought you were done with FSU and college football in general. What are you still doing here? lol

    I am, Im trolling USCw

    I don't give a shit about FSU, just stating facts that they have equal if not more talent at WR right now

    Facts are still facts

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    I am, Im trolling USCw

    I don't give a shit about FSU, just stating facts that they have equal if not more talent at WR right now

    Facts are still facts

    Yes, that is why we always here that USC has 2 1st rounders playing receiver, and we do not hear the same from FSU.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • NoVaNoles said...

    I am, Im trolling USCw

    I don't give a shit about FSU, just stating facts that they have equal if not more talent at WR right now

    Facts are still facts

    I blame Barkley for not spreading the ball around to different WRs like EJ does. That's what happens when you're great, but certainly not great...you only look to two WRs for production, not six.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • MJRuffalo said...

    Yes, that is why we always here that USC has 2 1st rounders playing receiver, and we do not hear the same from FSU.

    Yeah its not like things will change after the season or anything, great point shithead

    Only preseason predictions matter cause they always come true

    Besides FSU's studs aren't leaving so why would anybody put them in mock drafts ?

    Are you saying Julio Jones wasn't as good as somebody who went in the first round when he was a freshman ? is that your logic here ?

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by NoVaNoles on 5/16/2012 at 7:42 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • Action Figure said...

    I blame Barkley for not spreading the ball around to different WRs like EJ does. That's what happens when you're great, but certainly not great...you only look to two WRs for production, not six.

    Yeah it certainly worked our for both teams since neither of them won a damn thing last year

    I guess going 10-2 with no conference title is so much better than 9-4 with no conference title

    Only look for 2 WR's not 6 ? did you really just say that

    Okay so having shit for depth is a good thing then ? got it

    This post was edited by NoVaNoles on 5/16/2012 at 7:45 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Yeah it certainly worked our for both teams since neither of them won a damn thing last year

    I guess going 10-2 with no conference title is so much better than 9-4 with no conference title

    SC had to deal with snactions, thus they couldn't play in their conference championship game. What was FSU's excuse for not playing West Virginia in the Orange Bowl? Let me guess, they were great, but certainly not great?

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • Action Figure said...

    SC had to deal with snactions, thus they couldn't play in their conference championship game. What was FSU's excuse for not playing West Virginia in the Orange Bowl? Let me guess, they were great, but certainly not great?

    And why did you have sanctions ? oh right, cause you are a cheating, steroid infested joke of a program

    I near forgot, your school is everything that is wrong with college athletics in a nut shell

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Yeah it certainly worked our for both teams since neither of them won a damn thing last year

    I guess going 10-2 with no conference title is so much better than 9-4 with no conference title

    Only look for 2 WR's not 6 ? did you really just say that

    Okay so having shit for depth is a good thing then ? got it

    Shit for depth > shit for starters IYAM.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure

  • NoVaNoles said...

    And why did you have sanctions ? oh right, cause you are a cheating, steroid infested joke of a program

    I near forgot, your school is everything that is wrong with college athletics in a nut shell

    Every program isn't able to land top 10 recruiting classes year in and year out and still manage to shit the bed in the ACC like FSU. Underachieving of that magnitude takes serious concentration and FSU is focused. Instead of bitching all the time on here, you should be proud.

    signature image

    What sanctions? Our 75 are better than your 85.

    Action Figure