Online Now 3320

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2328
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3185
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Finish Line: Michigan

  • It's hardly a hypocritical policy. Hoke is responsible for what he and his coaching staff does. If prospects committed to him want to visit elsewhere, that's fine. They just won't have an offer to Michigan anymore. He can't help it if other coaching staffs don't follow that same policy. Kids who visit elsewhere really aren't committed and he knows it. There's just more consequences for kids who commit to Michigan and do it than for other schools.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • Can anyone blame a kid from wanting to experience the recruiting process, even if he is firmly committed?

    I say go an enjoy your senior year in HS as long as you take care of what's important.

    Jagstyle

  • sullkev said...

    Can anyone blame a kid from wanting to experience the recruiting process, even if he is firmly committed?

    I say go an enjoy your senior year in HS as long as you take care of what's important.

    Yeah, because if you're looking around, you're not committed. If you want to look around, don't commit. It's a pretty simply concept.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • sullkev said...

    Can anyone blame a kid from wanting to experience the recruiting process, even if he is firmly committed?

    I say go an enjoy your senior year in HS as long as you take care of what's important.

    And if a coach or anyone else wants to penalize the kid for this, well, good luck with the consequences of THAT action/policy.

    Jagstyle

  • psubills62 said...

    Yeah, because if you're looking around, you're not committed. If you want to look around, don't commit. It's a pretty simply concept.

    No one is committed until they sign the LOI.

    signature image

    devidee

  • psubills62 said...

    Yeah, because if you're looking around, you're not committed. If you want to look around, don't commit. It's a pretty simply concept.

    My post was simple. Firmly committed. Wants to experience the recruiting process. Maybe a kid wants to take a trip to Southern California even tho he has no intention of living there. Maybe, go visit an older brother and his campus... Maybe fly on an airplane for the first time. Maybe road trip out of state with some football buddies to see a big time college football game from the side lines.

    Why does that automatically void his commitment?

    Jagstyle

  • sullkev said...

    My post was simple. Firmly committed. Wants to experience the recruiting process. Maybe a kid wants to take a trip to Southern California even tho he has no intention of living there. Maybe, go visit an older brother and his campus... Maybe fly on an airplane for the first time. Maybe road trip out of state with some football buddies to see a big time college football game from the side lines.

    Why does that automatically void his commitment?

    No need to answer that..

    It Doesn't! But it will have Negative Consequences.

    Jagstyle

  • sullkev said...

    Can anyone blame a kid from wanting to experience the recruiting process, even if he is firmly committed?

    I say go an enjoy your senior year in HS as long as you take care of what's important.

    Yes. Don't commit if you want to look around, pretty simple.

    Kids word means less than nothing these days.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mriderblue12

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Kids word means less than nothing these days.

    Think about that statement. If you base your recruiting Philosophy on something as negative as that, you lose. Not talking about the one on one recruiting battles with school Y. I'm talking about what Coaches are trying to accomplish and the Big picture.

    Jagstyle

  • sullkev said...

    My post was simple. Firmly committed. Wants to experience the recruiting process. Maybe a kid wants to take a trip to Southern California even tho he has no intention of living there. Maybe, go visit an older brother and his campus... Maybe fly on an airplane for the first time. Maybe road trip out of state with some football buddies to see a big time college football game from the side lines.

    Why does that automatically void his commitment?

    Because if you're visiting another school, you're not firmly committed. That's simply how it works. If a kid visits elsewhere, he's interested in going elsewhere. There's never zero interest on the player's part.

    And it doesn't automatically void it. The people he's committed to might choose to void it, and in Michigan's case, they do. I see no problem with that.

    This post was edited by psubills62 on 11/13/2012 at 3:36 PM

    signature image

    psubills62

  • psubills62 said...

    Because if you're visiting another school, you're not firmly committed. That's simply how it works. If a kid visits elsewhere, he's interested in going elsewhere. There's never zero interest on the player's part.

    And it doesn't automatically void it. The people he's committed to might choose to void it, and in Michigan's case, they do. I see no problem with that.

    Thousands of kids - year after year - take official & unofficial - recruiting & non recruiting - trips, visits, & Saturday football games every single week.

    A "zero" percentage is ridiculous

    Jagstyle

  • The best way to explain this policy is this: If recruit A is, for example, a QB and he commits to school x and school x has told recruit A that they will only take 1 QB and are now done recruiting QB. Then recruit A "wants to look around" and eventually decommits, this leaves the school with no other options due to them stopping their recruitment of other QB prospects. That's unfair to the school. If recruit A wants to look around he doesn't deserve a spot while the coaches might need to start up recruiting other QB's again.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • I've had the privilege of talking to a couple folks close to the Michigan program over the last few days about the Conley situation.

    First thing they said is regardless of what is out there, every case is slightly different. The general policy of the current Michigan staff is that if a kid takes a visit to another school, Michigan coaches will begin recruiting his scholarship spot. The kid does not have his offer pulled, but he is no longer considered a commitment. From what I've been told, if the kid is upfront about things (as Conley has been), they will continue to consider him a recruit but also offer his spot to other recruits. At that point, it is a first-come, first served as to who gets the scholarship.

    Dawson had his scholarship pulled by the coaching staff because he was misleading the staff and doing things behind their backs. This obviously rubbed them the wrong way and they lost their trust in Dawson. Rather than continue to deal with him, they chose to part ways. They think Dawson's case is the exception and not the rule.

    So in the end, if Conley takes a visit he will no longer be considered a commit, but will still be considered a recruit and will have the opportunity to recommit unless someone jumps at his spot before he gets a chance.

    c_woodson

  • c_woodson said...

    I've had the privilege of talking to a couple folks close to the Michigan program over the last few days about the Conley situation.

    First thing they said is regardless of what is out there, every case is slightly different. The general policy of the current Michigan staff is that if a kid takes a visit to another school, Michigan coaches will begin recruiting his scholarship spot. The kid does not have his offer pulled, but he is no longer considered a commitment. From what I've been told, if the kid is upfront about things (as Conley has been), they will continue to consider him a recruit but also offer his spot to other recruits. At that point, it is a first-come, first served as to who gets the scholarship.

    Dawson had his scholarship pulled by the coaching staff because he was misleading the staff and doing things behind their backs. This obviously rubbed them the wrong way and they lost their trust in Dawson. Rather than continue to deal with him, they chose to part ways. They think Dawson's case is the exception and not the rule.

    So in the end, if Conley takes a visit he will no longer be considered a commit, but will still be considered a recruit and will have the opportunity to recommit unless someone jumps at his spot before he gets a chance.

    This is a very good explanation of the situation. Too many people think that the staff pulls offers or drops kids because they take a visit. It's the lying and deceit that got Dawson dropped. They will continue to have an offer for Conley, but they also won't hesitate to fill his spot if someone else wants to come.

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267

  • sullkev said...

    Thousands of kids - year after year - take official & unofficial - recruiting & non recruiting - trips, visits, & Saturday football games every single week.

    A "zero" percentage is ridiculous

    No, it's not ridiculous. It has to do with the definition of "committed."

    signature image

    psubills62

  • psubills62 said...

    No, it's not ridiculous. It has to do with the definition of "committed."

    The definition of committed is signing day. Until that point, a zero tolerance on any type of trip a 18 year old kid takes IS ridiculous.

    Jagstyle

  • sullkev said...

    The definition of committed is signing day. Until that point, a zero tolerance on any type of trip a 18 year old kid takes IS ridiculous.

    ...in your opinion.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • sullkev said...

    The definition of committed is signing day. Until that point, a zero tolerance on any type of trip a 18 year old kid takes IS ridiculous.

    The definition of committed hasn't changed just because some whimsical 17-year olds decide it means something else. If you're visiting, you're not committed.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • sullkev said...

    The definition of committed is signing day. Until that point, a zero tolerance on any type of trip a 18 year old kid takes IS ridiculous.

    So I take it you're the type of guy who must have every promise written down and signed in order to consider it legitimate?

    signature image signature image signature image

    Mitch Again

  • psubills62 said...

    The definition of committed hasn't changed just because some whimsical 17-year olds decide it means something else. If you're visiting, you're not committed.

    Honestly.. it's not even worth trying to explain that it's a two way commitment to some of these clowns. Our coaches are committing a scholarship that could go to somebody else... but yeah that's worth nothing. no

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267

  • sullkev said...

    The definition of committed is signing day. Until that point, a zero tolerance on any type of trip a 18 year old kid takes IS ridiculous.

    Just a Buckeye fan looking in, but from my understanding, if a Michigan "committed" recruit wants to take visits, he is no longer considered "committed." However, it seems that the offer is not necessarily pulled. In the case of Conley, if he informs the Michigan staff that he wants to take visits, he is no longer part of the recruiting class. However, it seems that after making the visits, if Conley wants to "commit" again, I believe Michigan would take him (assuming no more visits!)

    My read on Michigan's stance is: if you "commit," you are committed to the Michigan program and therefore there is no need to take any visits to other schools.

    I believe the whole offer being pulled mess began with Dawson going behind Michigan's back to set a visit with Florida. I think Dawson would've been in the same boat as Conley in that he would still have an offer on the table but just not considered a part of the 2013 recruiting class. It's just how Dawson went about it that upset the Michigan staff enough to pull his offer (ie., not the way a "Michigan Man" would go about things).

    chiggins18

  • chiggins18 said...

    Just a Buckeye fan looking in, but from my understanding, if a Michigan "committed" recruit wants to take visits, he is no longer considered "committed." However, it seems that the offer is not necessarily pulled. In the case of Conley, if he informs the Michigan staff that he wants to take visits, he is no longer part of the recruiting class. However, it seems that after making the visits, if Conley wants to "commit" again, I believe Michigan would take him (assuming no more visits!)

    My read on Michigan's stance is: if you "commit," you are committed to the Michigan program and therefore there is no need to take any visits to other schools.

    I believe the whole offer being pulled mess began with Dawson going behind Michigan's back to set a visit with Florida. I think Dawson would've been in the same boat as Conley in that he would still have an offer on the table but just not considered a part of the 2013 recruiting class. It's just how Dawson went about it that upset the Michigan staff enough to pull his offer (ie., not the way a "Michigan Man" would go about things).

    By looking in you meant to say rewriting c_woodson's post word for word.

    But yes, this is the policy.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Mitch Again

  • Mitch Again said...

    By looking in you meant to say rewriting c_woodson's post word for word.

    But yes, this is the policy.

    Sorry. Missed c-woodson's post. Just seemed like a lot of bickering on a subject that seemed pretty straight forward...

    chiggins18

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    ...in your opinion.

    It is also my opinion to allow for some freedom & fun - As long as the kid takes care of whats important. Keep in mind, there is already a signing day. To have a policy that attempts to speed up the signing day process is one thing. To make it a Zero policy is Ridiculous. Quote me if you must.

    Jagstyle

  • sullkev said...

    It is also my opinion to allow for some freedom & fun - As long as the kid takes care of whats important. Keep in mind, there is already a signing day. To have a policy that attempts to speed up the signing day process is one thing. To make it a Zero policy is Ridiculous. Quote me if you must.

    lol You're a little slow, aren't you? You act as if the coaches are locking these kids up in a dorm room. They are allowed to do whatever they want to. They just won't be considered committed and a spot won't be guaranteed for them if they visit.

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267