Online Now 3215

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2319
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3237
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

First Amendment a felony?

  • This may have been posted here, but I just watched the video on YouTube.

    The Secret Service can determine free speech zones?

    I understand it was passed months ago, but I never heard about it.

    This post was edited by Jeff4SC on 3/1/2013 at 2:39 PM

    Play

    Obama signs bill 'in secret' making FREE S...

    And yet another 'bill' signed into law in secret. HR 347. Obama does it again. This time the attack is against the First Amendment and free speech. This new law make 'No Free Speech" Zones wherever the Secret Service says so. Bye bye Protests. Bye bye Free Speech. Bye bye Constitution. BE SURE TO 'LIKE' SUBSCRIBE and SHARE my websites http://thedailytrumpet.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/user/gvloanguy http://www.facebook.com/theDailyTrumpet DISCLAIMER: This video contains copyrighted material and is used for educational purposes ONLY. I make no claim to any material used within the video. All copyrighted materials belong to their respective owners. "This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is (1) non-commercial, (2) transformative in nature, (3) uses no more of the original work than necessary for the video's purpose, and (4) does not compete with the original work and could have no negative affect on it's market."

    http://www.youtube.com/v/nKjy0PDlKV4

    Jeff4SC ●

  • snopes.com: HR 347 - Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act

    Did the passage of HR 347 make it illegal to protest anywhere the Secret Service is present?

    www.snopes.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4 ●

  • sf2k4 said...

    It shouldn't have been passed in the first place.

    So like the video said....are you telling me a person can't stand on the opposite side of the street from the President and protest his policies?

    This post was edited by Jeff4SC on 3/1/2013 at 2:44 PM

    Jeff4SC ●

  • The first amendment contains exceptions for time, place, and manner restrictions.

    Final Countdown

  • Jeff4SC said...

    It shouldn't have been passed in the first place.

    So like the video said....are you telling me a person can't stand on the opposite side of the street from the President and protest his policies?

    From my understanding, it refers to people trespassing in buildings and structured deemed "secure" by the Secret Service, no? I mean, I don't see anything wrong with proper security protocols to protect the President and other high value personnel. AFAIK, that doesn't mean you can't protest across the street. I'll go back in and read it to see.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4 ●

  • Final Countdown said...

    The first amendment contains exceptions for time, place, and manner restrictions.

    Not being able to protest around the President so he can keep up appearances does not fall within those exceptions.

    TroyTide ●

  • TroyTide said...

    Not being able to protest around the President so he can keep up appearances does not fall within those exceptions.

    Can you give me the case cite to support your position?

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw ●

  • TroyTide said...

    Not being able to protest around the President so he can keep up appearances does not fall within those exceptions.

    If the rationale is for security reasons (or other legitimate reasons), then yes, it falls within the exception.

    Final Countdown

  • Jeff4SC said...

    This may have been posted here, but I just watched the video on YouTube.

    The Secret Service can determine free speech zones?

    I understand it was passed months ago, but I never heard about it.

    More of a security thing, IMO.

    It is in line with the Patriot Act. Could it be abused? Definitely. Does that mean it will? No.

    Bills like this need to monitored closely to see how they are inforced, but if used correctly, I see the positives from them as well.

    BetterOff

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports