Online Now 3824

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1452
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3473
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Guns of law abiding citizen confiscated

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    look.

    all you tough-guy killers with your guns and your "them aint goner take mah gunzes..."

    realize this:

    the second amendment had a reason. That reason was to arm the citizens to guard against tyranny. (lot of good that did you southreners the first time... amirite?)

    you all don't deserve guns, and your ancestors would take them away if they saw your pussified, tranquilized state. You don't NEED guns because you all aren't ever really gonna do shhhhht with your guns, anyways.

    Y'all are scared to death about rising up... basically, the founding fathers would be all like, "why the fffffk do these broads even have guns?"

    The primary reason people have guns is to rise up against the government?

    VTSmitty

  • Weedline said...

    Nothing a pot of boiling water to the face and 3 minutes of beatings with a bat couldn't fix. Hell, we might even UNmistakably break parts of his hand and arm when he attempts to assault my family. It would be a shame if said beating caused him to never be able to flex his arm all the way out again thus ending his career. He might then have to learn to read IMO.

    You're giving them too much...

    What you're talking about takes actual balls instead of pulling a trigger

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    look.

    all you tough-guy killers with your guns and your "them aint goner take mah gunzes..."

    realize this:

    the second amendment had a reason. That reason was to arm the citizens to guard against tyranny. (lot of good that did you southreners the first time... amirite?)

    you all don't deserve guns, and your ancestors would take them away if they saw your pussified, tranquilized state. You don't NEED guns because you all aren't ever really gonna do shhhhht with your guns, anyways.

    Y'all are scared to death about rising up... basically, the founding fathers would be all like, "why the fffffk do these broads even have guns?"

    This is literally the dumbest post in the history of your stupid posts.

    lolz at your assumptions about what people will and will not do, and what we need.

    The second amendment was certainly not for that reason....

    signature image

    Lebron James will never be as good as Michael Jordan, thus we should get rid of his nickname, "The King".

    amrollZ71

  • VTSmitty said...

    The primary reason people have guns is to rise up against the government?

    I also question if he knows what the second amendment was for

    signature image

    Lebron James will never be as good as Michael Jordan, thus we should get rid of his nickname, "The King".

    amrollZ71

  • Jeff4SC said...

    If you live in a state that is actively violating your second amendment rights, I would suggest planning a move. Soon

    You actually read Glen Beck's website. My god, that is embarrassing.

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • Weedline said...

    Nothing a pot of boiling water to the face and 3 minutes of beatings with a bat couldn't fix. Hell, we might even UNmistakably break parts of his hand and arm when he attempts to assault my family. It would be a shame if said beating caused him to never be able to flex his arm all the way out again thus ending his career. He might then have to learn to read IMO.

    Genius. All I need is a stove, a pot, a gallon of water, and 5-10 minutes for it to reach the proper temperature and I am safe. I can't believe that I have never thought of that one before. Anybody want to buy some guns?

    justinboze

  • amrollZ71 said...

    I also question if he knows what the second amendment was for

    A well regulated militia?

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • Attacking military commander checklist for ground invasion:
    national guard check, okay we can handle them
    1/3 of military active oversees okay
    300 million guns (estimated in US) rethink strategy
    Ill keep my guns. China hates out gun situation

    Baroldonfire

  • Baroldonfire said...

    Attacking military commander checklist for ground invasion: national guard check, okay we can handle them 1/3 of military active oversees okay 300 million guns (estimated in US) rethink strategy Ill keep my guns. China hates out gun situation

    lol

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • I give credit to libs for strongly advocating that the government will never take any of our rights away. On the downside, the reason that is so is because they advocate freely giving up all our rights.

    I think libs aren't worried about being shot, or defending themselves. They are mainly concerned with what conservatives are thinking and how can they make them stop thinking that way.

    VTSmitty

  • VTSmitty said...

    I give credit to libs for strongly advocating that the government will never take any of our rights away. On the downside, the reason that is so is because they advocate freely giving up all our rights.

    I think libs aren't worried about being shot, or defending themselves. They are mainly concerned with what conservatives are thinking and how can they make them stop thinking that way.

    I'm not a lib, but I'm mainly just laughing at all of you. The paranoia and all around stupidity is fantastic comedy.

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • amrollZ71 said...

    I also question if he knows what the second amendment was for

    Ha ha ha ha... okay.

    So, the protection of rights, as Harrington theorized...

    Also, one must include the necessity of the standing army, and the need for the citizens to protect themselves against it, (tyranny), though that debate speaks more towards the military clause...

    These , though, are the federalist views...

    The anti-federalist views, however, such as those put forth by Richard Henry Lee and Patrick Henry, were that the right to own firearms not only to protect against the standing army, but also against a tyrannical government far removed from the needs if its citizens...

    George Mason, though, took this one step further, noting that the protection offered by gun ownership also allowed man to protect himself against his neighbors...

    We could go on and on... but yes... the primary reason for the second amendment was to protect the citizenry from the tyranny of the government...

    Thus government tyranny calls for a rising up against the government, yes.

    You all must be lost by the facts, though

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    Ha ha ha ha... okay.

    So, the protection of rights, as Harrington theorized...

    Also, one must include the necessity of the standing army, and the need for the citizens to protect themselves against it, (tyranny), though that debate speaks more towards the military clause...

    These , though, are the federalist views...

    The anti-federalist views, however, such as those put forth by Richard Henry Lee and Patrick Henry, were that the right to own firearms not only to protect against the standing army, but also against a tyrannical government far removed from the needs if its citizens...

    George Mason, though, took this one step further, noting that the protection offered by gun ownership also allowed man to protect himself against his neighbors...

    We could go on and on... but yes... the primary reason for the second amendment was to protect the citizenry from the tyranny of the government...

    Thus government tyranny calls for a rising up against the government, yes.

    You all must be lost by the facts, though

    We didn't even have a standing army until the civil war, lolz

    signature image

    Lebron James will never be as good as Michael Jordan, thus we should get rid of his nickname, "The King".

    amrollZ71

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    You're giving them too much...

    What you're talking about takes actual balls instead of pulling a trigger

    Ish. Pulling a trigger takes balls. When I was twelve I shot a buddy of mine through the hand with a crosman 760. 10 pumps at 30 yards. I had him lined up square in the iron T for a good minute before I could summon the courage.

    One shot, one kill.

    brem22

  • amrollZ71 said...

    We didn't even have a standing army until the civil war, lolz

    Aaaand you've just proved nothing.

    You should be more well read before you attack

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    Aaaand you've just proved nothing.

    You should be more well read before you attack

    I prove that what you posted amounts to nearly nothing since half of it was what founding fathers thought about something that the USA did not have at their time.

    signature image

    Lebron James will never be as good as Michael Jordan, thus we should get rid of his nickname, "The King".

    amrollZ71

  • Amroll just shut up

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • azvalleybuckeye said...

    then you couldn't defend yourself against the boxer that shows up at your house, douche.

    You ever heard of a samurai sword ni**a ?

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Amroll just shut up

    These are facts, not arm chair ideological views like barney posts.

    signature image

    Lebron James will never be as good as Michael Jordan, thus we should get rid of his nickname, "The King".

    amrollZ71

  • justinboze said...

    That is a fantasy world. There are too many guns in the country for getting rid of them to ever be a real option, especially at the rate people are buying them now. You say that you have reflected on it and you would rather just close to nobody have them. Not happening. I read somewhere that the state of Ohio had enough guns to be one of the top 10 standing armies in the world.

    No shit its a fantasy world, just painting a picture for how retarded gun ownership is

    Humans beings are the ultimate failure of planet earth

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • amrollZ71 said...

    These are facts, not arm chair ideological views like barney posts.

    Sure

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • Weedline said...

    Nothing a pot of boiling water to the face and 3 minutes of beatings with a bat couldn't fix.

    Lmao... fail

    signature image signature image signature image

    Golden is better then Jimbo is. I feared it was true. He is going to hoist a crystal ball there. -fsufsu

    ilovelamp51

  • amrollZ71 said...

    I prove that what you posted amounts to nearly nothing since half of it was what founding fathers thought about something that the USA did not have at their time.

    You are wrong.

    The founding fathers are the ones who designed the second amendment, and for which reasons they included it.

    You wish to discuss the reasons for the second amendment, though to ignore the reasons and reasoning behind it by the founding fathers?

    Case closed, I'd say.

    Like I said, be more well read before you attack. Might I suggest the Federalist papers, as well as the Anti-federalist papers?

    Or you could just stop digging that hole

    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    www.yohoodent.com ... errybawdee awn ignorle

    GoingLightBarny

  • GoingLightBarny said...

    You are wrong.

    The founding fathers are the ones who designed the second amendment, and for which reasons they included it.

    You wish to discuss the reasons for the second amendment, though to ignore the reasons and reasoning behind it by the founding fathers?

    Case closed, I'd say.

    Like I said, be more well read before you attack. Might I suggest the Federalist papers, as well as the Anti-federalist papers?

    Or you could just stop digging that hole

    No....just no.

    If a country did not have a standing army, who would defend it?

    signature image

    Lebron James will never be as good as Michael Jordan, thus we should get rid of his nickname, "The King".

    amrollZ71

  • I wouldn't sweat any true gun seizure. Not enough law enforcement officers out there to seize them. No sheriff would enforce this law. His deputies would be hypocrites.
    Nobel idea but just not realistic

    Baroldonfire