-
roger huerta said...
not going to happen. it's been said many times - w/o teams that can make an impact to the bottom line (read: nd, fsu), there will be no b12 expansion. byu is a possibility given their network and fanbase, but louisville, cincy, etc have no shot at all.
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21086 votes total - All American
- (15269)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
VaHorn
- 4 stars Rating: 71
3699 votes total - Redshirt
- (3919)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
FSUTrackLove said...
ACC is forming a research consortium similar to the B1G and actually has universities that would make it more of a benefit to be a part of the ACCs version. PSU hates the B1G just as much as they hate ND. Penn St has money and the ACC TV deal would increase with the addition of both PSU and ND and that is not deniable. Not sure how much but just adding ND partially added 1.5million and would increase depending on if they join fully. PSU is one of the big fish in college football(not now of course but historically and fanbase proves this) so adding them to the ACC substantially increases the worth of any contract including them and ND. PSU's fanbase is eastern and it would be easier for them to travel to away ACC games. Its actually not that farfetched to think they would leave considering they don't gain much money(in the grand scheme of things) from athletics. So even if they took a 3-5million hit in athletic revunue with the ACC tv deal they gain:
-Just as academically competitive(maybe more) conference
-Return to the east: Bringing back all old rivalriesThis post has been edited 4 times, most recently by MrWoodson on 9/14/2012 at 2:46 PM
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21086 votes total - All American
- (15269)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx
- 4 stars Rating: 79
8599 votes total - All American
- (16840)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
VaHorn said...
Idiotic thread so consider this a mercy post. Texas COULD go independent, but that has never been seriously considered. As Nebraska and Arkansas discovered, leaving behind traditional rivalries is never a plus. After 20 years Arky still doesn't have any rivalry games. Texas has always made far more money than any other college. It is not even close. That was before the lucrative LHN contract. Texas has already signed non-conference series with Notre Dame, USC, BYU and Maryland. That trend will continue. Who knows, maybe someday Arkansas will gather the courage to complete their twice-postponed series with Texas. Couple that with a much strengthened Big 12 and the future is bright indeed .
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21086 votes total - All American
- (15269)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MrWoodson said...
You have no idea what you're talking about. You don't just "create a research consortium". The CIC has been in existence for decades and is by far the dominant such entity in the country. PSU's research funding has skyrocketed since they joined the B10. And ND is not joining the ACC for football. ND played PSU and the B10 with that card for years. Then the BE. Then the B12. They are now playing the ACC. If you want to believe ND joining for non-football sports is just the first step to ND joining as a full member, go ahead. You are deluding yourself, but you won't be the first person. It's not happening.
FSUTrackLoveFSU
- 4 stars Rating: 75
543 votes total - Letterman
- (1852)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
FSUTrackLove said...
Well the thing about ND is they are leaching just in case conferences implode they have a foot in the door... IF and that is IF one of the big conferences implodes then ND as an independent will have no chance at a playoff due to inability to schedule games....considering most games will be devoted to conference opponents... I'm not deluding myself Im giving a hypothetical situation in which ND would be forced to make a choice...which would be the ACC...and as far as a research consortium not just being created obviously you have to create one otherwise the CIC would not exist. I said the ACC is in the process of making one meaning they don't have one but ACC schools have begun the process by getting benefits for doing things as peer universities. While it in no way has the benefits of the CIC right now, this is the beginning. Both do similar things for the member institutions while the ACCIAC is not as beneficial currently, it is working towards being the same type of system.
This post has been edited 4 times, most recently by MrWoodson on 9/14/2012 at 3:27 PM
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21086 votes total - All American
- (15269)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Status ●
- 4 stars Rating: 61
4054 votes total - Starter
- (6837)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
roger huerta ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2149 votes total - Redshirt
- (3319)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21086 votes total - All American
- (15269)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
roger huerta ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2149 votes total - Redshirt
- (3319)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MrWoodson said...
Arky is laughing all the way to the bank. And because it worked out so poorly for them, Nebraska, TAMU, Colorado and Missouri followed. Look, I will be extremely happy to see UT remain in the B12. I see UT as much more of a threat as an independent. So I hope you're right. I'm just looking at the numbers and the logic of the situation and I think the clock is ticking and it's only a matter of time before UT goes off on its own. We will just have to wait and see which one of us is right.
VaHorn
- 4 stars Rating: 71
3699 votes total - Redshirt
- (3919)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
jtmva
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1073 votes total - Walk-on
- (2771)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Goldrusher35 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
483 votes total - Letterman
- (2155)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jtmva said...
I don't see Texas going independent until something drastic happens with the college football playoff system(like 16 teams) or other confernces start seeing teams go that route. There is no benefit to going independent aside from money and in case you haven't noticed, Texas has plenty of that.
Texas stridently made an effort to keep the Big 12 together. They never truly entertained the thought of going elsewhere unless Oklahoma did. In that scenario they only vetted the option of the Pac 12 because at that point they'd have to get in where they fit in. The Big 12 would've collapsed. Oklahoma was the one pursuing the Pac 12 but they weren't wanted unless Texas came with them.
ND can stay independent because their true motive is money. They're not naive enough to believe that they can truly compete consistently for national titles. Indepent status is their calling card and what they consider a part of what makes them special. ND has never been concerned with fitting in. They're too concerned with being considered unique and special. That is their downfall and partly why they can't compete for national titles. They have their priorities in the wrong order.
Texas has it made in the Big 12 in the years that they win it. They'll automatically be tied into the major bowls and in most years the playoff system. The only real threat is Oklahoma. Why give that up to go independent, while still playing the only real threat in Oklahoma, and risk being constanly left out of the playoff system. If they lose to Oklahoma while independent and Oklahoma wins the Big 12 with a comparable record, who's getting the playoff invite? 9 times out of 10 it will be Oklahoma.
MarineMountie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3903 votes total - Twitter: @MarineMounty247
- All American
- (17150)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
andrew32 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
1632 votes total - Yukon Cornelius
- Redshirt
- (3836)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
VaHorn
- 4 stars Rating: 71
3699 votes total - Redshirt
- (3919)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
jtmva said...
I don't see Texas going independent until something drastic happens with the college football playoff system(like 16 teams) or other confernces start seeing teams go that route. There is no benefit to going independent aside from money and in case you haven't noticed, Texas has plenty of that.
Texas stridently made an effort to keep the Big 12 together. They never truly entertained the thought of going elsewhere unless Oklahoma did. In that scenario they only vetted the option of the Pac 12 because at that point they'd have to get in where they fit in. The Big 12 would've collapsed. Oklahoma was the one pursuing the Pac 12 but they weren't wanted unless Texas came with them.
ND can stay independent because their true motive is money. They're not naive enough to believe that they can truly compete consistently for national titles. Indepent status is their calling card and what they consider a part of what makes them special. ND has never been concerned with fitting in. They're too concerned with being considered unique and special. That is their downfall and partly why they can't compete for national titles. They have their priorities in the wrong order.
Texas has it made in the Big 12 in the years that they win it. They'll automatically be tied into the major bowls and in most years the playoff system. The only real threat is Oklahoma. Why give that up to go independent, while still playing the only real threat in Oklahoma, and risk being constanly left out of the playoff system. If they lose to Oklahoma while independent and Oklahoma wins the Big 12 with a comparable record, who's getting the playoff invite? 9 times out of 10 it will be Oklahoma.
Spolarbear72 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
1131 votes total - Letterman
- (2193)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Spolarbear72 said...
Your wrong about the pac 12 not wanting Oklahoma if Texas didn't come. The hold up was Oklahoma wanted to bring little brother along for some reason and the pac12 balked at okie lite coming. If Oklahoma had agreed to leave lil bro OU would have been in the pac 12 and Texas would have likely gone as well. Texas always wanted to keep the conference intact and was willing to what it took to do so, but if not they were looking at options.
This post was edited by MrWoodson on 9/15/2012 at 9:09 AM
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21086 votes total - All American
- (15269)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Spolarbear72 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
1131 votes total - Letterman
- (2193)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MrWoodson said...
Listen to you guys. You are arguing over who tried to leave first. The fact is both UT and OU have seriously explored leaving the B12 at least twice during the past three years. They simply couldn't get a deal they liked well enough. If either one of them ever finds an acceptable alternative, buh-bye B12.
roger huerta ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2149 votes total - Redshirt
- (3319)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Spolarbear72 said...
I'm not arguing over who wanted to leave first cause I really didn't care. They made a point the pac 12 wouldn't take Ou without Texas and I said they was but Ou wouldn't leave without lil bro. If Ou was willing to leave okie lite Ou would've been the school to join not Utah.
This post was edited by Tom Riddle on 9/15/2012 at 12:53 PM
Tom Riddle
- 4 stars Rating: 70
609 votes total - Freshman
- (366)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Einstein
- 3 stars Rating: 57
3201 votes total - Starter
- (7387)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars





NOT gonna happen










How long before Texas goes independent?