Online Now 3497

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2612
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 4019
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

I dont think the evidence is strong enough to say interception

  • I didnt watch game last night, but watched replay this morning. I dont understand how someone can definitely say it was an interception (or catch). They looked to be equally fighting for the ball while standing up, which would mean they shared possession.

    I think the replay ref not overturning it sums up what I was thinking. I thought I was going to see some overwhleming evidence based on the reaction by everyone.

    MarylandDawg

  • Who cares whatever happened after the obvious PI shouldn't have mattered.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Here I sit broken hearted, had to fart but then i sharted.

    WillieMuffcramp

  • NoVaNoles201711

  • TheKing said...

    I didnt watch game last night, but watched replay this morning. I dont understand how someone can definitely say it was an interception (or catch). They looked to be equally fighting for the ball while standing up, which would mean they shared possession.

    I think the replay ref not overturning it sums up what I was thinking. I thought I was going to see some overwhleming evidence based on the reaction by everyone.

    Can't have possession when one hand never even touches the ball until AFTER he is laying on the ground. Meanwhile, the Packer dude had the ball to his chest with both hands on it.

    First person I have seen that says its not an interception. Every single analyst in the world is wrong, every single NFL fan that I have seen post on boards is wrong as well. TheKing is correct.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Team Targaryen

    MarineMountie

  • McSt[]_[]dly said...

    Who cares whatever happened after the obvious PI shouldn't have mattered.

    Yea that was pretty shitty.

    The catch/int though is not as clear as I thought it would be based on everyones reaction

    MarylandDawg

  • NoVa-Noles said...

    Shut up

    Yes sir. stache

    signature image signature image signature image

    Here I sit broken hearted, had to fart but then i sharted.

    WillieMuffcramp

  • MarineMountie said...

    Can't have possession when one hand never even touches the ball until AFTER he is laying on the ground. Meanwhile, the Packer dude had the ball to his chest with both hands on it.

    First person I have seen that says its not an interception. Every single analyst in the world is wrong, every single NFL fan that I have seen post on boards is wrong as well. TheKing is correct.

    TheKing is trolling as per usual.

    When will people stop falling for them?

    signature image signature image signature image

    mriderblue12

  • MarineMountie said...

    Can't have possession when one hand never even touches the ball until AFTER he is laying on the ground. Meanwhile, the Packer dude had the ball to his chest with both hands on it.

    First person I have seen that says its not an interception. Every single analyst in the world is wrong, every single NFL fan that I have seen post on boards is wrong as well. TheKing is correct.

    I am not saying it is or isnt. I think it is not clear either way, therefore it should stay how they called it.

    For the record I am not trolling.

    MarylandDawg

  • McSt[]_[]dly said...

    Yes sir. stache

    Not you

    The OP

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles201711

  • There is a reason the replay official didn't over turn it guys. I think everyone is overreacting because it is the new refs, if the old refs did it this is probably not talked about

    MarylandDawg

  • It's so obvious man it wasn't even close all Golden tate had was his arm on the body of the packers play. IF you think that's a TD catch your football knowledge is trash.

    jmsmooth33

  • NoVa-Noles said...

    Not you

    The OP

    Oh, in that case shut the fvck up OP.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Here I sit broken hearted, had to fart but then i sharted.

    WillieMuffcramp

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    It's so obvious man it wasn't even close all Golden tate had was his arm on the body of the packers play. IF you think that's a TD catch your football knowledge is trash.

    I guess you guys have reading comprehension problems.

    I don't think it is clear either way what happened, therefore it should stand as called like they did. I thought based on the reaction everyone had that it would be very clear. Someone explain why the replay official didn't over turn it if it is so obvious and clear?

    MarylandDawg

  • TheKing said...

    I don't think it is clear either way what happened, therefore it should stand as called like they did. I thought based on the reaction everyone had that it would be very clear. Someone explain why the replay official didn't over turn it if it is so obvious and clear?

    B/c they have no idea what they are doing, they can't even ref a lingerie game let alone a NFL game. It is 100% clear it was an interception looking at it live and on replay. You obviously don't understand the rules or are just trolling.

    jmsmooth33

  • If you can look at this photo and still argue that it isn't conclusive, more power to you.

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    thejumper5

  • TheKing said...

    There is a reason the replay official didn't over turn it guys. I think everyone is overreacting because it is the new refs, if the old refs did it this is probably not talked about

    So wrong on so many levels.trolls

    BIGJLAW

  • BIGJLAW said...

    So wrong on so many levels.trolls

    If it is so crazy and I am so stupid, than why didn't they over turn it?

    I really am not trolling, I dont see how someone can say definitely either way it was int or catch

    MarylandDawg

  • thejumper5 said...

    If you can look at this photo and still argue that it isn't conclusive, more power to you.

    You can't even see the ball???

    A receiver has never made a 1 handed catch? I see where you are going, but this if anything makes it even more in doubt because you cant even see the ball.

    MarylandDawg

  • TheKing said...

    If it is so crazy and I am so stupid, than why didn't they over turn it?

    I really am not trolling, I dont see how someone can say definitely either way it was int or catch

    Wel then your football knowledge is complete gutter trash, these refs have no idea what their doing they've made awful call after awful call and your expect them to make a right call. Are you kidding me man?

    jmsmooth33

  • MarineMountie said...

    Can't have possession when one hand never even touches the ball until AFTER he is laying on the ground. Meanwhile, the Packer dude had the ball to his chest with both hands on it.

    First person I have seen that says its not an interception. Every single analyst in the world is wrong, every single NFL fan that I have seen post on boards is wrong as well. TheKing is correct.

    Really? Well then the regular refs have been missing the call on one handed catches for years.

    dpfenny

  • Another thing you can't review simultaneous catch, that's not a reveiwable play so therfore it can't be overturned.

    jmsmooth33

  • dpfenny said...

    Really? Well then the regular refs have been missing the call on one handed catches for years.

    No, they haven't. Simultaneous possession requires both players to have possession of the ball through contact of the ground. Green Bay had the ball by both hands and pinned to his chest. Tate was touching the ball with one hand. That is NOT simultaneous possession, that is an interception by the defense.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Team Targaryen

    MarineMountie

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    Another thing you can't review simultaneous catch, that's not a reveiwable play so therfore it can't be overturned.

    It is a reviewable call on a scoring play, not in the field of play.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Team Targaryen

    MarineMountie

  • MarineMountie said...

    It is a reviewable call on a scoring play, not in the field of play.

    It wasn't a simultaneous catch it was an interception.

    jmsmooth33

  • MarineMountie said...

    No, they haven't. Simultaneous possession requires both players to have possession of the ball through contact of the ground. Green Bay had the ball by both hands and pinned to his chest. Tate was touching the ball with one hand. That is NOT simultaneous possession, that is an interception by the defense.

    Do both hands have to be on the ball to be considered "possession"? NOPE.

    dpfenny

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports