Online Now 3263

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1956
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3260
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

I will give Obama my full support if:

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I agree.

    I think some people are philosophically opposed to the idea of constructive measures because it would possibly mean more government (which I don't think it could or should be limited to) whether or not it was successful.

    Probably. But controlling isn't the same as taking away when it comes to guns IMO. If you have nothing to hide and really do want one for protection, hunting, etc. you probably won't mind going through a little more to get it

    signature image signature image signature image

    ezel4

  • Would be more cost effective to provide better access to mental health care

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • irishyoung420 said...

    You just quoted Infowars.....all credibility is lost

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • irishyoung420 said...

    You really want to take guns away from the people that hunt and protect there house? That's the only thing you have in this world to protect yourself and family.

    The barriers BLF is proposing would in no way impede this. Sane people who are interested in guns for the right reasons will not be affected

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • You separate a culture from what it was built upon and this is what you get. We don't have a gun issue, we have a cultural one. Guns have been around for hundreds of years and this crap used to not happen. So we need to ask ourself why does this happen now, but not a hundred years ago? Guns aren't the variable.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    You separate a culture from what it was built upon and this is what you get. We don't have a gun issue, we have a cultural one. Guns have been around for hundreds of years and this crap used to not happen. So we need to ask ourself why does this happen now, but not a hundred years ago? Guns aren't the variable.

    Media probably has a lot to do with it. No one thought to go shoot up a school

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • TroyTide said...

    You separate a culture from what it was built upon and this is what you get. We don't have a gun issue, we have a cultural one. Guns have been around for hundreds of years and this crap used to not happen. So we need to ask ourself why does this happen now, but not a hundred years ago? Guns aren't the variable.

    People not taking responsibility for their actions and the social stigma that it's not okay to get help for your problems, in this case mental. What happens after a mass shooting? We blame the media or video games or music or the other kids at school... we rarely blame the parents or the aggressor themselves. Or if we do the latter, we immediately talk about what a terrible human being they are and how they've been a demon their entire lives and we hope they burn in hell... instead of, you know, looking back over all the years of them showing signs of having issues and not encouraging them to get help. Even worse, we make fun of this people as being "weak" and tell them to just man up. No, stop being in denial and a prideful asshole and tell them to do the adult thing and see someone about their problems.

    That's what our culture issues are.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • sf2k4 said...

    People not taking responsibility for their actions and the social stigma that it's not okay to get help for your problems, in this case mental. What happens after a mass shooting? We blame the media or video games or music or the other kids at school... we rarely blame the parents or the aggressor themselves. Or if we do the latter, we immediately talk about what a terrible human being they are and how they've been a demon their entire lives and we hope they burn in hell... instead of, you know, looking back over all the years of them showing signs of having issues and not encouraging them to get help. Even worse, we make fun of this people as being "weak" and tell them to just man up. No, stop being in denial and a prideful asshole and tell them to do the adult thing and see someone about their problems.

    That's what our culture issues are.

    Partly, and as the poster above you stated the media is part of the reason too. But also that we just don't expect much out of people anymore. Society doesn't demand that parents do a better job parenting or that kids behave as much as we used too.

    Everything is relative now. There is no longer a strict set of commonly accepted behaviors and social norms that we adhere to. Also people, parents are far more selfish than before.

    Some people are just born crazy, but we seem to have a s###ton of them, they aren't all born crazy.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    Partly, and as the poster above you stated the media is part of the reason too. But also that we just don't expect much out of people anymore. Society doesn't demand that parents do a better job parenting or that kids behave as much as we used too.

    Everything is relative now. There is no longer a strict set of commonly accepted behaviors and social norms that we adhere to. Also people, parents are far more selfish than before.

    Some people are just born crazy, but we seem to have a s###ton of them, they aren't all born crazy.

    Society has always been relative. Your idea of what society used to be is a myth.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • TroyTide said...

    Some people are just born crazy, but we seem to have a s###ton of them, they aren't all born crazy.

    Some people are born a little off and then are made fun of their entire lives, have parents that don't know how to handle the situation (and in some cases are embarrassed by them), and in the end are never encouraged to seek help or they are made fun of more for doing so. You wouldn't laugh at someone with a bum knee going to see a orthopedist, why laugh at someone with depression going to see a psychiatrist?

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Society has always been relative. Your idea of what society used to be is a myth.

    Lol. Okay then. I swear to god you will take any position so long as it disagrees with mine.

    And society hasn't always been like this, there was a time when people didn't lock there doors etc. things weren't perfect but they weren't what they are now.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I agree.

    I think some people are philosophically opposed to the idea of constructive measures because it would possibly mean more government (which I don't think it could or should be limited to) whether or not it was successful.

    No....we dont need more government

    Jeff4SC

  • BetterOff said...

    Guns.........they kill. I am tired of the redneck and street thug population keeping lobbyist from doing away with them. The politician that will standup against that will get my support.

    Native Americans hunted long before guns were around. No excuse, IMO.

    Be my guest, but remember this fact. If you outlaw guns the only people who will own them are outlaws themselves. We need a plan I agree, but completely taking away the ability to protect ones own family is not the answer. I have a beautiful family of five. What do you suggest I do when that lawless thug breaks in my home while my wife and precious children are sleeping? I don't think a sling shot is going to do it....

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Nobody makes me bleed my own blood, nobody!"

    Red Goodman

  • TroyTide said...

    Lol. Okay then. I swear to god you will take any position so long as it disagrees with mine.

    And society hasn't always been like this, there was a time when people didn't lock there doors etc. things weren't perfect but they weren't what they are now.

    Lol. No.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • Jeff4SC said...

    No....we dont need more government

    You probably should re-read my post.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Lol. No.

    yes.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Lol. No.

    Just once admit you are wrong. Society was much safer pre 1950 than today...that's a fact.

    TroyTide

  • irishyoung420 said...

    Am j supposed to take this seriously?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • TroyTide said...

    You separate a culture from what it was built upon and this is what you get. We don't have a gun issue, we have a cultural one. Guns have been around for hundreds of years and this crap used to not happen. So we need to ask ourself why does this happen now, but not a hundred years ago? Guns aren't the variable.

    Because a couple hundred years ago it would take 30 minutes to fire off 30 rounds from a musket, not 20 seconds from a semi-automatic hand gun with an extended clip.

    I will agree, militia language aside, that the second amendment protects your right to own a musket, regulation of anything else should be up for discussion.

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • CockAtLaw said...

    Because a couple hundred years ago it would take 30 minutes to fire off 30 rounds from a musket, not 20 seconds from a semi-automatic hand gun with an extended clip.

    I will agree, militia language aside, that the second amendment protects your right to own a musket, regulation of anything else should be up for discussion.

    So the first amendment shouldn't cover radio, television, or internet? Just print? It's not the guns fault. It's just an inanimate object.

    Surferdude

  • Small magazines is absurd. How hard would it have been to shoot unarmed children with a revolver and a few speed loaders? Not hard. It's sad that gun haters will use this tragedy to further their agenda.

    Surferdude

  • Surferdude said...

    So the first amendment shouldn't cover radio, television, or internet? Just print? It's not the guns fault. It's just an inanimate object.

    Sorry, I went into my strict constructionist mode for a moment.

    I believe, the second amendment, just like the first amendment is not absolute and can be regulated for the general welfare. It's a balancing test, but until people are willing to have reasonable policy discussions, it's no point.

    You're right, it is an inanimate object; it's personal property, not really a whole lot else. And there are thousands of items of personal property that are regulated and subject to government oversight in the hands of private individuals. The balancing test may be different, but it's still there.

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • Murder rates and violent crime rates were much lower 50 years ago than they are now. However the 1970s saw a sharp increase in these types of crimes and violent crimes statistically peaked in the 1980's and have slowly declined since then.

    I don't have the statistics on mass murder but I would have to believe it is much higher today than it has ever been. Just a guess on my part.

    With the internet and social media being what it is today the news of any kind of violent crime travels very quickly and we are much more used to seeing news reports on these crimes.

    Doesn't mean there isn't a terrible problem and something doesn't need to be done about it.

    I own several guns myself but most are used for hunting.

    Measures need to be taken to try and quell the violence. It is a very difficult situation and I do not pretend to have all the answers. I do know that change begins in the home and with the parents. Don't let young kids watch violent programs on television/movies. Don't let young kids play violent video games until they are old enough to separate the game from real world situations. Talk to your kids about right and wrong and leave no doubt that violence is wrong. I don't know where you go from there.

    signature image signature image signature image

    the_bagman

  • joetheogre said...

    Would be more cost effective to provide better access to mental health care

    if you want cost savings & actual results ...
    effective today begin air-dropping Class 1 and 2 (serious) criminals into the middle east on a daily basis.

    * close/ dramatically reduce prison cost

    if you are convicted you no longer "win free housing" instead you win...
    a) a free skydiving trip and b) a parachute (hope it opens)

    band-aids do not help if crooks & spastic-pansies are involved. if you really want to draw a line in the dirt....then do it.

    does it come across as heartless & uncivil ? maybe, but it doesnt equate killing 30 kids at a school yard and its far more "humane"
    than my #1 overall "on the spot" choice.

    Crimson_Ghost

  • When was the last time a weapon prohibited by the assault weapons ban was actually used in a mass murder?

    There may have been during this last event. All I read was handguns and a .223 rifle (assuming ar15), so this is an honest question.

    BenelliDawg