Online Now 2800

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2301
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2684
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

ITT a poster tells us why home owners are ruining America

  • CMXI said...

    You do realize that many have different reasons, right? You might be afraid that the government is going to take your guns, someone else might be afraid that the government is going to take away their right to free speech, someone else might be afraid that the government is going to take away their right to make choices over their own body.

    When you phrase the question to ask if the federal government "threatens your personal rights and freedoms," then of course you'll get every single person with any possible gripe against any aspect of the government coming out in force. Hell, even I'd answer yes, because I believe many Republican politicians proposing anti-abortion laws are threatening personal rights and freedoms. To me, it's surprising that the number isn't higher.

    Do you honestly think that abortion could ever become illegal in this country? To a point that you feel threatened that the gov't could take away that right? IMO that's no different than saying that Obama is going to take away everyone's guns. Both will never happen.

    justinboze

  • rms02d said...

    Most of the people on foodstamps work. Quit trolling, and I don't give a shit about foodstamps either way. Its just funny that "foodstamps are bad, but free stuff for me is good because I EARNED it" Everyone has this mindset and thats why we can't fix the deficit.

    From an economic standpoint the "negative externality" effects of the mortgage deduction may be more harmful to society than "externality" effects of foodstamps.

    What happened to the Free Market?

    Why is it okay for the Federal Government and that Got Damn Obama to artificially inflate home prices with subsidies?

    You do realize that the price of your house is correlated to the savings from the income deduction right? You pay more for your home because of this subsidy.

    If the subsidy indirectly increases housing prices, then why is it a good thing?

    A Food Stamp in and of itself is anti free market.

    I believe in helping those that are less fortunate, but elongated free rides I am not unless there is some kind of disability that prevents one from working. Have more kids does not count.

    The opinion that the mortgage deduction may artificially increase prices may be true, but the percentage of actual responsibility is so small compared to the laundry list of other influences and is far out weighed by the economic benefits of a healthy real estate market, that a deduction like this may promote.

    A decline in real estate sales eventually leads to a decline in real estate prices. This then reduces the value of everyone’s homes, whether they are actively selling it or not. This then reduces the amount of home equity loans the homeowner can get. This, then, reduces consumer spending.

    Over 70% of the U.S. economy is based on personal consumption. A reduction in consumer spending will contribute to a downward spiral in the economy. This results in further unemployment, further reduction in income, and further reduction in consumer spending. Then the country could fall into a recession or worse.

    We are credit based and consumer based society and interest on everything from loans to CC's have contributed in part to our economy and our debt. A radical change in how we spend and approach the concept of consumerism is what is needed.

    I don't want to get off track here so I ask, who pays for the food stamps? How do food stamps stimulate the greater economy? Considering you group homeowners together please do the same with people who use food stamps and the your whole "mindset" comment. Are food stamps helping fix the economy?

    I know you don't care about the food stamps but rather the greater economic circle and all the moving parts, but this is a debate I'm happy to have.

    Outstanding

  • justinboze said...

    Do you honestly think that abortion could ever become illegal in this country? To a point that you feel threatened that the gov't could take away that right? IMO that's no different than saying that Obama is going to take away everyone's guns. Both will never happen.

    Absolutely. When a party is running presidential candidates who declare that overturning Roe v. Wade is one of their fundamental priorities, I absolutely believe abortion could become illegal.

    The difference between that and the gun issue is that Obama has never said he "wants to take away everyone's guns", that's just paranoid reactions to the slightest suggestion of gun regulation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • Listen here lawyer, you aren't going to spin my words. I did t say why people don't trust our government, I said that the majority of people don't trust our government t.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • Outstanding said...

    How do food stamps stimulate the greater economy?

    We both recognize that our economy is heavily reliant on consumer spending.

    Food stamps stimulate our economy by freeing up money for those who are practically guaranteed to go right back out and spend it on consumer products. Nobody on food stamps is taking the savings and putting it in the bank. All the food stamp money is effectively being used as a stimulus for consumer spending.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    We both recognize that our economy is heavily reliant on consumer spending.

    Food stamps stimulate our economy by freeing up money for those who are practically guaranteed to go right back out and spend it on consumer products. Nobody on food stamps is taking the savings and putting it in the bank. All the food stamp money is effectively being used as a stimulus for consumer spending.

    According to your thinking, if the government wanted to really stimulate the economy then they should give us all food stamps. After all, that would free up even more money that we normally spend on groceries to increase spending on other consumer products, like iPhones, rims, and flat screens.

    I'm going to get twinkies on my ride. Where do I sign up?

    justinboze

  • CMXI said...

    Absolutely. When a party is running presidential candidates who declare that overturning Roe v. Wade is one of their fundamental priorities, I absolutely believe abortion could become illegal.

    The difference between that and the gun issue is that Obama has never said he "wants to take away everyone's guns", that's just paranoid reactions to the slightest suggestion of gun regulation.

    I don't remember that but I won't argue with you. I'm pro choice btw.

    justinboze

  • CMXI said...

    We both recognize that our economy is heavily reliant on consumer spending.

    Food stamps stimulate our economy by freeing up money for those who are practically guaranteed to go right back out and spend it on consumer products. Nobody on food stamps is taking the savings and putting it in the bank. All the food stamp money is effectively being used as a stimulus for consumer spending.

    Right, by taking money from people that work hard to give it to those that don't.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • I've decided that the majority of tBB just hates poor people.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • CMXI said...

    We both recognize that our economy is heavily reliant on consumer spending.

    Food stamps stimulate our economy by freeing up money for those who are practically guaranteed to go right back out and spend it on consumer products. Nobody on food stamps is taking the savings and putting it in the bank. All the food stamp money is effectively being used as a stimulus for consumer spending.

    Sorry that was poorly worded on part.

    I agree with you as for every $1 spent on food stamps $1.73 could potentially be circulated through the economy.

    Food stamps for everyone!

    Outstanding

  • justinboze said...

    According to your thinking, if the government wanted to really stimulate the economy then they should give us all food stamps. After all, that would free up even more money that we normally spend on groceries to increase spending on other consumer products, like iPhones, rims, and flat screens.

    I'm going to get twinkies on my ride. Where do I sign up?

    No, you're misunderstanding it. We can all agree that there are pretty much basic necessities that people need to live, right? Food, shelter, etc. There are also secondary products that people can give up, but most don't - cable tv, internet access, furniture, transportation, etc.

    The point of this is to give money to people who make so little money that it's practically a guarantee that they'll go out and spend any extra money on more consumer products. Giving money to you or me wouldn't do anything because we'd be just as likely (if not more likely) to save it than spend it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • USMCAG said...

    Right, by taking money from people that work hard to give it to those that don't.

    I don't think you really understand the reality that someone can work hard and still be poor.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • sf2k4 said...

    I've decided that the majority of tBB just hates poor people.

    It's this whole bullcensored ideology of "wealth = morality" that has been increasingly pervasive in some of the less-intelligent demographics in American society. It makes it a whole lot easier to be a selfish jerk towards poor people when you have some moral reasoning behind it (regardless of how illogical and idiotic that reasoning is.) If you can delude yourself into believing that being poor is solely a personal failing, you won't feel as bad about dismissing all poor people.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    It's this whole bullcensored ideology of "wealth = morality" that has been increasingly pervasive in some of the less-intelligent demographics in American society. It makes it a whole lot easier to be a selfish jerk towards poor people when you have some moral reasoning behind it (regardless of how illogical and idiotic that reasoning is.) If you can delude yourself into believing that being poor is solely a personal failing, you won't feel as bad about dismissing all poor people.

    I understand we need more personal responsibility in this country and I also understand that if you want a better job and more money you need to work hard, get an education, and move up. But I feel like there's a fundamental lack of understanding of the fact that there are jobs in this country that don't pay well and someone HAS to work them. Literally, HAS to. It's not like those jobs are going anywhere.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • sf2k4 said...

    I understand we need more personal responsibility in this country and I also understand that if you want a better job and more money you need to work hard, get an education, and move up. But I feel like there's a fundamental lack of understanding of the fact that there are jobs in this country that don't pay well and someone HAS to work them. Literally, HAS to. It's not like those jobs are going anywhere.

    Exactly. There isn't some moral failing on the part of your average janitor, but the "wealth = morality" ideology has made it a lot more palatable for the vast majority of the populace when laws/policies are enacted that result in wage stagnation or even decreases for the members of society working jobs that are already low-paying.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • I guess we'll just have to trust that all the needies are honestly looking for work like they're suppose to. I mean, that is being monitored isn't it?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Nobody makes me bleed my own blood, nobody!"

    Red Goodman

  • Red Goodman said...

    I guess we'll just have to trust that all the needies are honestly looking for work like they're suppose to. I mean, that is being monitored isn't it?

    No one is saying we don't need welfare reform; God knows the system needs to be fixed. But we've got to stop making such sweeping generalizations all the time. Saying no one on welfare is actually working a hard days work is just as bad as someone saying that all Christians want to burn gay people alive. Sure, it makes arguing easier when you generalize, but it doesn't make you correct and in the long run I think it does a lot of damage because people start to really believe it and then base decisions on it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • Red Goodman said...

    I guess we'll just have to trust that all the needies are honestly looking for work like they're suppose to. I mean, that is being monitored isn't it?

    This is kinda what I'm talking about. Coining pejorative terms like "needies" for diverse groups of people is unnecessary and unproductive. Red, didn't you tell me that you received aid at one point in your life? There are a ton of "working poor" people who don't make enough money to survive.

    And yes, welfare work requirements are still in place, despite the huge push by the Romney campaign back in mid-2012 to say otherwise.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • sf2k4 said...

    No one is saying we don't need welfare reform; God knows the system needs to be fixed. But we've got to stop making such sweeping generalizations all the time. Saying no one on welfare is actually working a hard days work is just as bad as someone saying that all Christians want to burn gay people alive. Sure, it makes arguing easier when you generalize, but it doesn't make you correct and in the long run I think it does a lot of damage because people start to really believe it and then base decisions on it.

    Let me ask you a question. When people do surveys and a update comes across the bottom of your tv screen saying "97% of Americans feel this or do that or want this etc", do you ever wonder why the fk you were never asked? It's because they did a "sweeping generalization" based on the answers of 1000 people. Which 1000? Where from, how old, what party are they for? Our entire system is set up to ask a few and run it through, ask a few run it through.

    You said yesterday that you wanted drivers license test to be much more strict, why, because you wanted a certain level of knowledge and accountability to be met before setting kids free on the road. Well guess what, today I'm saying I want the welfare system to be more strict, why, because I want a certain level of knowledge and accountability to be met before giving money away that I helped work for.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Nobody makes me bleed my own blood, nobody!"

    Red Goodman

  • Red Goodman said...

    I want a certain level of knowledge and accountability to be met before giving money away that I helped work for.

    If you want that, you'd be better served arguing for corporate transparency re: corporate tax breaks and corporate welfare. The amount of taxpayer money going to welfare pales in comparison to the taxpayer money subsidizing large corporations.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • Red Goodman said...

    Let me ask you a question. When people do surveys and a update comes across the bottom of your tv screen saying "97% of Americans feel this or do that or want this etc", do you ever wonder why the fk you were never asked? It's because they did a "sweeping generalization" based on the answers of 1000 people. Which 1000? Where from, how old, what party are they for? Our entire system is set up to ask a few and run it through, ask a few run it through.

    You said yesterday that you wanted drivers license test to be much more strict, why, because you wanted a certain level of knowledge and accountability to be met before setting kids free on the road. Well guess what, today I'm saying I want the welfare system to be more strict, why, because I want a certain level of knowledge and accountability to be met before giving money away that I helped work for.

    I'm quite well versed in how surveys are done. I got my Masters in advertising for God's sake. lol

    And like I said, I agree that the system needs reform. But part of that starts with not treating all poor people as if they're bad people.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • CMXI said...

    This is kinda what I'm talking about. Coining pejorative terms like "needies" for diverse groups of people is unnecessary and unproductive. Red, didn't you tell me that you received aid at one point in your life? There are a ton of "working poor" people who don't make enough money to survive.

    And yes, welfare work requirements are still in place, despite the huge push by the Romney campaign back in mid-2012 to say otherwise.

    Yeah and this is what I'm talking about. I call them needy, you slap a more respectable title on them and we suddenly forget that many are abusing the system ehh? That's the research for reform I'm referring to because the ones I speak of are just that, needy and nothing more. Unless you grew up in this my town you will never know where I'm coming from (and visa versa). It's about weeding out the needy's so the ones who "have" to have it can get it long term.

    That's just it, I'm not againt welfare, food stamps or any govt assistant. I have zero issues with that. They could give more $$$ to less peolle and I wouldn't care...as long as there's a system to weed out the abusers.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Nobody makes me bleed my own blood, nobody!"

    Red Goodman

  • sf2k4 said...

    I'm quite well versed in how surveys are done. I got my Masters in advertising for God's sake. lol

    And like I said, I agree that the system needs reform. But part of that starts with not treating all poor people as if they're bad people.

    Nice plug on your education now lets get one thing straight, I'm for govt assistants, I'm not for a system that doesn't weed out the abusers. You act as if I'm somehow part of the problem and you're here to educate the poor Mississippi boy on what he doesn't know. You don't like mass generalizations ehh? Could have fooled me.

    You quoted me as saying "I want the welfare system to be more strict, why, because I want a certain level of knowledge and accountability to be met before giving money away that I helped work for."

    Yes I clearly hate poor people. Smh

    This post was edited by Red Goodman on 2/1/2013 at 1:57 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Nobody makes me bleed my own blood, nobody!"

    Red Goodman

  • WillieMuffcramp said...

    I can't buy a mansion with the housing credit but I can buy lobster and filet's with food stamps. Maybe if they had TV stamps the people on food stamps wouldn't steal mine. coffee

    Quite possibly the most outstanding analogy I have heard in my 43 years of life.

    Go bucky go

  • Red Goodman said...

    Nice plug on your education now lets get one thing straight, I'm for govt assistants, I'm not for a system that doesn't weed out the abusers. You act as if I'm somehow part of the problem and you're here to educate the poor Mississippi boy on what he doesn't know. You don't like mass generalizations ehh? Could have fooled me.

    It was a joke, not an insult. 90% of what I did in grad school was conduct surveys.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4