Online Now 3438

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1797
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3415
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

ITT tell me...

  • If the NCAA wants to, they can easily bring this under Article 10 of the bylaws- Ethical Conduct.

    10.01 General Principle. "Individuals employed by (or associated with) a member institution to administer, conduct or coach intercollegiate athletics and all participating student-athletes shall act with honesty and sportsmanship at all times so that intercollegiate athletics as a whole, their institutions and they, as individuals shall represent the honor and dignity of fair play and the generally recognized high standards associated with wholesome competitive sports."

    10.1. Unethical Conduct. Unethical conduct by a prospective or enrolled student-athlete or a current or former institutional staff member...may include, but is not limited to, the following:
    (a) - (j) list things that cover different subject matter (drugs or admissions, etc.) but ALL go to fraud/cover up/lying.

    It's not always what you do or don't do that is the problem. It's lying about it.

    FSULaura

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Paterno reported the incident to his superiors.

    You're kidding right?

    A co-worker of yours rapes multiple customers, on company grounds, you tell your boss?

    This post was edited by downlowdawg on 6/14/2012 at 8:12 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    your mother's favorite poster.

    downlowdawg

  • downlowdawg said...

    You're kidding right?

    A co-worker of yours rapes multiple customers, on company grounds, you tell your boss?

    He wasn't a co-worker, he was a retired employee and Paterno had no link to him at that time.

    Look, I'm not saying that Paterno took the best course of action because clearly he should have taken McQueary to the police station right away. But him sending the information to his superiors should still have gotten things accomplished.

    getmyjive11

  • FSULaura said...

    If the NCAA wants to, they can easily bring this under Article 10 of the bylaws- Ethical Conduct.

    10.01 General Principle. "Individuals employed by (or associated with) a member institution to administer, conduct or coach intercollegiate athletics and all participating student-athletes shall act with honesty and sportsmanship at all times so that intercollegiate athletics as a whole, their institutions and they, as individuals shall represent the honor and dignity of fair play and the generally recognized high standards associated with wholesome competitive sports."

    10.1. Unethical Conduct. Unethical conduct by a prospective or enrolled student-athlete or a current or former institutional staff member...may include, but is not limited to, the following: (a) - (j) list things that cover different subject matter (drugs or admissions, etc.) but ALL go to fraud/cover up/lying.

    It's not always what you do or don't do that is the problem. It's lying about it.

    So who was lying? Certainly the two football staff members (Paterno and McQueary) did not lie in the eyes of the court. What program are they going to punish?

    getmyjive11

  • This whole notion that the first time Paterno knew anything about Sandusky's behavior was from McQueary is ludicrous.

    People focusing on what McQueary said or didn't say are simply deflecting from the obvious.

    signature image

    devidee

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    You Penn State fans are the only people on the planet who believe that Paterno is clean in this thing. Holy hell, its a stretch to call things this, but its like a cult. Yes it has to do with the football program, because the head coach and athletic director were directly involved in keeping a child molestor's farm of victims (which was promoted on and funded by the name of said football program). This was allowed to operate within the football program's facilities, under jurisdiction of the heads of the athletic department. You can try and look at this as everyone is out to get you and there is incorrect information out there, but you guys are trying to skew it to fit the image of your hero.

    That is why that program needs to sit a few years out and gain some perspective. Football isn't as important as a University understanding that child molestation shouldn't be swept under the rug and allowed. Penn State lost track of that, and obviously won't accept that anytime soon.

    on AU vs USC issues, I hate you.

    On everything else... we agree on it all.

    Paterno is a sick fvck. He chose not to risk lawsuit over saving kids from getting raped. What a fvcked up man... I'll see him in hell.

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • big john said...

    They are saying that it could fall under the NCAA'S ethic's code somehow. It is still such ashame that a great institution has been dragged through the mud because of one sick & demented individual. I hope they fry that bastard.

    One?

    How about all the sick pathetic individuals who covered it up and then watched it happen for another 8-10 years?

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • getmyjive11 said...

    He wasn't a co-worker, he was a retired employee and Paterno had no link to him at that time.

    Look, I'm not saying that Paterno took the best course of action because clearly he should have taken McQueary to the police station right away. But him sending the information to his superiors should still have gotten things accomplished.

    Somehow I get the feeling that if it was your child that had been raped, your sick loyalty wouldn't be so strong.

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • nwo wiping the floors with the delusional

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • aumajorpain said...

    nwo wiping the floors with the delusional

    If Alonzo wasn't such a left coaster he could be a good addition, sigh.........

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • pstrjohn said...

    If Alonzo wasn't such a left coaster he could be a good addition, sigh.........

    lesser of two evils

    signature image signature image signature image

    @rpayne2107

    CptAUmerica21

  • pstrjohn said...

    Somehow I get the feeling that if it was your child that had been raped, your sick loyalty wouldn't be so strong.

    I'm pretty damn sure that I would be mad at Sandusky, Spanier, Curley and Schultz before Paterno. And please stop with this "sick loyalty" BS, I went to PSU from 2000 to 2004 and there wasn't a day that I wanted him gone as a coach. I live a couple of miles away from the stadium yet I never visited his statue nor have I felt the need to. I think he was a good man who made a serious, serious mistake and until there is evidence that he was helping Spanier cover this up to protect the football program, I'm not going to accuse him of that. The guy F'd up. My university F'd up. I'm glad that they removed him and everyone else involved right away.

    getmyjive11

  • pstrjohn said...

    Somehow I get the feeling that if it was your child that had been raped, your sick loyalty wouldn't be so strong.

    Yeah, because we would have more information regarding what happened..... you guys are mistaking us waiting for more information to come out with outright support of JoePa.... believe me if it comes out that he was as involved as it appears curley schultz and Spanier appear to be than we won't be defending him like this anymore.... we just want people to give him the benefit of the doubt until the entire story gets told, as would anybody here if it was anybody they cared about.....

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by ejb5212 on 6/14/2012 at 9:31 AM

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • getmyjive11 said...

    I'm pretty damn sure that I would be mad at Sandusky, Spanier, Curley and Schultz before Paterno. And please stop with this "sick loyalty" BS, I went to PSU from 2000 to 2004 and there wasn't a day that I wanted him gone as a coach. I live a couple of miles away from the stadium yet I never visited his statue nor have I felt the need to. I think he was a good man who made a serious, serious mistake and until there is evidence that he was helping Spanier cover this up to protect the football program, I'm not going to accuse him of that. The guy F'd up. My university F'd up. I'm glad that they removed him and everyone else involved right away.

    If you don't want to accuse him then that is your prerogative, but why the constant defense of his inaction and head turning? Do you not think he should have done more?

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • ejb5212 said...

    Yeah, because we would have more information

    You don't need more information, just the common sense to properly react to what you already know.

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • pstrjohn said...

    If you don't want to accuse him then that is your prerogative, but why the constant defense of his inaction and head turning? Do you not think he should have done more?

    Joe didn't have the power to ban sandusky from campus or football buildings and he believed going to schultz was going to the head of the university park police (who had jurisdiction in the one incident).... So minus going to the police and banning sandusky from campus what more could he have done? Serious question what more would you want from a man who didnt even witness the event and the guy who told him what happened has changed his story 4 times.....

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • pstrjohn said...

    If you don't want to accuse him then that is your prerogative, but why the constant defense of his inaction and head turning? Do you not think he should have done more?

    I want to know what was said to him by Spanier, Curley and Schultz after they decided to sit on this. It is important because it could explain why he didn't push the issue. If they told him nothing notworthy, it would be disappointing and I would condem Paterno on the spot.

    Despite me not being a supporter of Paterno over the last 10 years, there is no denying the good that he did for the university. That is why you see so many people defending Paterno. It's easy for someone on the outside to just bury him right away, but that is because you don't have any kind of attachment to him. Most PSU fans are being objective and are just waiting to see all the information come out. That is all.

    getmyjive11

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    Believe me, the NCAA doesn't give two s**ts about their policies or precedence. They are the judge, jury, and executioner. They have zero due process, and can do whatever the hell they want. If they wanted to, they could abolish that athletic department and Penn State couldn't do a thing.

    Truth. People don't believe it until it happens to their program, but this is the truth.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TheT12

  • ejb5212 said...

    Joe didn't have the power to ban sandusky from campus or football buildings and he believed going to schultz was going to the head of the university park police (who had jurisdiction in the one incident).... So minus going to the police and banning sandusky from campus what more could he have done? Serious question what more would you want from a man who didnt even witness the event and the guy who told him what happened has changed his story 4 times.....

    Going to the police would have been just fine. Even going to the actual campus police. Not calling some administrator and passing the buck. And please don't give me the "Joe thought that Shultz was the head of the Police" the man had been at the University for 40 years and knew exactly what Shultz was and what he did. And how do you know what "Joe" believe anyway? Serious question. JP himself said that he should have done more and he should have.....Period.

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • ejb5212 said...

    Joe didn't have the power to ban sandusky from campus or football buildings and he believed going to schultz was going to the head of the university park police (who had jurisdiction in the one incident)....

    You actually believe this?

    Delusional.

    Paterno made a choice to not put a stop to Sandusky's actions because he put Penn State football above everything.

    signature image

    devidee

  • pstrjohn said...

    Going to the police would have been just fine. Even going to the actual campus police. Not calling some administrator and passing the buck. And please don't give me the "Joe thought that Shultz was the head of the Police" the man had been at the University for 40 years and knew exactly what Shultz was and what he did. And how do you know what "Joe" believe anyway? Serious question. JP himself said that he should have done more and he should have.....Period.

    Just one thing. The Campus Police is the police. Unlike most college campuses, the Penn State Police have full police jurisdiction over the University Park (PSU campus) area. There is a misconception that the Penn State Police are just a bunch of rent-a-cops. They are not.

    This is also why telling the Schultz about Sandusky is more meaningful than others are leading on.

    getmyjive11

  • getmyjive11 said...

    I want to know what was said to him by Spanier, Curley and Schultz after they decided to sit on this. It is important because it could explain why he didn't push the issue. If they told him nothing notworthy, it would be disappointing and I would condem Paterno on the spot.

    Despite me not being a supporter of Paterno over the last 10 years, there is no denying the good that he did for the university. That is why you see so many people defending Paterno. It's easy for someone on the outside to just bury him right away, but that is because you don't have any kind of attachment to him. Most PSU fans are being objective and are just waiting to see all the information come out. That is all.

    I understand the attachment and don't deny he did tremendous good for the University. But that cannot outweigh what he did not do for these kids. You can say wait and see, be the situation posed, given the totality of the circumstances, leads a reasonable and prudent person to conclude that Joe Pa should have done more. Not saying he is a pedophile or that he directly aided Sandusky. but by all accounts he burried his head and he realized that in the end, if not befofe. And most PSU fans I have interacted with are defending him with blind loyalty not waiting (not directed at you)

    signature image signature image signature image

    pstrjohn

  • devidee said...

    You actually believe this?

    Delusional.

    Paterno made a choice to not put a stop to Sandusky's actions because he put Penn State football above everything.

    prove it... right now, you cant, we don't know the whole story and Joe has earned the right to have the full story told before you say something that you cannot take back like pretty much eeverything your retreaded ass says

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • nowayman said...

    And once again, I ask you to post a single example where the NCAA has put its foot down regarding a criminal issue

    A single one.

    ?

    UA policy on first offense drug test failure is 3 games. NCAA is 1 year. We've suspended players for 3 games before. The NCAA has declared them ineligible for calendar years before. If the Honey Vager had failed an NCAA required drug test, he'd have been out until near the end of next season. This is criminal. No one believes weed (or synthetic weed) makes you run faster.

    Alonzo is right in many ways. They created free agency for their players. At Alabama, they took testimony from secret witnesses and treated it as hard evidence (although their own bylaws restrict them from even taking secret testimony). That would be akin to my being falsely accused of burglary, the prosecution having zero evidence, and then taking a testimony from my wife's jealous, obsessed stalker off the record, and away from the courtroom. It's a legit question whether I committed a burglary, but it's not LEGAL to take such a testimony. The NCAA doesn't have a due process, and they don't follow their own rules. I don't think they're going to bother Penn State, but they COULD bury them if they wanted to.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TheT12

  • ejb5212 said...

    prove it... right now, you cant, we don't know the whole story and Joe has earned the right to have the full story told before you say something that you cannot take back like pretty much eeverything your retreaded ass says

    There are two groups of people regarding this entire situation: reasonable people and Penn State fans.

    No one is in both groups.

    signature image

    devidee