Online Now 3503

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1790
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3498
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

If another religion becomes the majority

  • Explain.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • goodnews said...

    By "raw data" all I'm talking about is the bare evidences that all scientists have to go by. I call them raw (I've read the term often by scientists )b/c they haven't yet been forced into anyone's preconceived models. All I'm saying is that the data seems to usually fit better in the creation models, and often doesn't fit into the evolutionists models. I gave the example of the eye and eyesight. It seems impossible to fit it into the evolutionary understanding of things, and fits very logically into a model that includes an intelligent designer. i also mentioned the reality of the mass and charge of all the protons and electrons in the universe, as well as, the uniformity of temperature throughout the universe. All these are better explained by an intelligent designewr and are problems for evolutionists.

    You, on the other handm have offered nothing of substance.

    The example of the eye is a bogus one. You are basing your claim on the bogus concept of irreduceable complexity. Evolutionary models have shown how the eye could evolve and how each level of the eye's evolution can provide a benefit to the creature that posesses it. this ranges from very basic light receptors to highly functioning focusing eyes.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by OmegaBuckeye on 4/20/2012 at 3:57 AM

    We are both atheists. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours

    OmegaBuckeye

  • TalHawkins112 said...

    I would contend they were more committed to science and logical reasoning.

    I would think most would accept the 'raw data' suggests that no creator is required for life.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=evidence+for+creationism&title=Special%3ASearch

    trololol

    This post was edited by ramssuperbowl99 on 4/20/2012 at 7:11 AM

    ramssuperbowl99

  • ramssuperbowl99 said...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=evidence+for+creationism&title=Special%3ASearch

    trololol

    Weak Sauce.

    We are both atheists. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours

    OmegaBuckeye

  • there is no "right" religion. the spirit and soul move on, and only until then we will understand that......

    Run the ball. Stop the run. You win, or lose, up front.

    Coach_Clancy

  • Coach_Clancy said...

    there is no "right" religion. the spirit and soul move on, and only until then we will understand that......

    A universalist. I don't think we've ever seen one on here before. cheers for bringing in a different world-view.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • ramssuperbowl99

  • ramssuperbowl99 said...

    Did you make that?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • ramssuperbowl99 said...

    Priceless:)

    We are both atheists. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours

    OmegaBuckeye