The Blue Board

Wont see a trial, most likely, but I doubt he totally walks.

The overcharging probably was done to entice Zimmerman to accept a deal.

I dont think he can trust a jury at this point.

Good point.

I think this is why any exculpatory evidence--or any evidence inconsistent with the prosecution's theory of the case--is presumed to be manufactured and of no weight within a criminal trial

Some of yah are trully idiots when you sit here and try to place blame on the kid (and who cares if the media and politics got into it, never would if the Sanford Police would have arrested that coward day one)...I don't care that he had a bloodied head...you know why??? He had no reason and no right to follow and confront that kid...common sense tells you (forget common sense, listen to the cowards 911 call) he was not going to let this "suspicious person" get away...what were his words again? oh yeah, "f*ckin punk/coons/goons" (no matter which one he said it tells you his state of mind), "they always get away" (what do you mean by "they")...he confronted that kid, probably got his whooped so he decides to pull out his gun and shoots the kid...WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THAT KID WHO WAS SIMPLY MINDING HIS OWN BUSINESS AFTER COMING BACK FROM THE STORE TO PURCHASE A FEW SNACKS FOR THE ALL-STAR GAME GO AND ATTACK SOME STRANGER??????? COMMON SENSE AND THE 911 TAPE TELLS YOU ZIMMERMAN CONFRONTED THAT KID...PERIOD!

Point being everyone under the sun knows she had something to do with the death of her daughter and yet the prosecution still couldn't prove it in the minds of a jury.

She never admitted to anything but she lied about damn near everything. Lying is essentially all she was convicted of. Still didn't get her a** convicted of murder.

Of course he admitted to shooting him, he couldn't possibly deny it. Shooting someone and murdering someone aren't necessarily the same thing.

Is this a troll attempt? Serious question.

What exactly are you trying to defend about that coward Zimmerman? You think he was justified in killing that young boy??? A bloodied head does not disprove anything, it just shows he got into a fight...one picture does not make a case for the defense...trust me, the prosecution has something that no one knows about (not even that coward and his attorney know yet)...if that coward's head was being bashed on the concrete sidewalk and he had blood on the back of his head...THERE SHOULD ALSO BE BLOOD ON THAT SIDEWALK THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH HAVING YOUR HEAD BASHED INTO/ONTO THAT SIDEWALK

You talk big but if some huge black stranger kid was bashing your head on the pavement you would do what you had to do to defend your life.

Why? Are you gonna kill him?

yes! I live in Orlando and sure went and checked it out (that complex is very easy to get into)...unless they cleaned up that blood very good...THERE WAS NONE

How did you gain access to a crime scene?

Were there crime scene investigators investigating along side you?

I blame Martins girlfriend for all this.

Agreed.

I think he's going to walk.