The Blue Board

Did you read my comments? I consider dynasties to be teams that won at least 3 titles in a short time span. FSU did not do that.

I don't consider FSU in the 90's a dynasty. They won 2 titles separated by more than a few years. Doesn't make a dynasty, IMO. You disagree, obviously.

Yes I disagree with you along with most his thread and the media.

Bulls 6 in 7yrs

Bill Russell: 11 in 13 years.

Hold up...

Duke isn't a dynasty?

Going to 7 Final Fours in 9 years isn't a dynasty?

Going to 4 National Championship Games in 5 years isn't a dynasty? Winning 2 of those isn't enough?

Since you Noles are to humble to post...

I give you - FSU in the '90s!

1990: 10-2
1991: 11-2
1992: 11-1 (ACC Champions)
1993: 12-1 (National Champions, ACC Champions)
1994: 10-1-1 (ACC Champions)
1995: 10-2 (ACC Champions)
1996: 11-1 (ACC Champions)
1997: 11-1 (ACC Champions)
1998: 11-2 (ACC Champions)
1999: 12-0 (National Champions, ACC Champions)

109-13-1

It also bears noting that during this period, FSU played Florida and Miami every year OOC.

Florida during this period was 102-22-1, won 1 National Championship, 5 SEC Championships, and accounted for 4 of FSU's losses and the 1 tie.

Miami during this period was 92-27, won 1 National Championship, 5 Big East Championships, and accounted for 4 of FSU's losses.

No FSU was playing inferior teams. Nebraska was playing a fairly stout schedule. I give the edge to Nebraska. On paper is when you use stats. On the field you compare opponents. It has been debated many times that it is easier for a lesser team to rise to the top 1 a year than to do it consistently for a season. Nebraska had a tougher road to hoe, in my opinion.

My definition of a dynasty would be complete dominance. 3 titles in a row, or at least contention. (No Bama fans your 2010 season doesn't count.) Top 3-5 for 4 -5 years in a row. Consistent record for 8-10 years(no worse than 9-3 record over that span)

This whole post is shit but winning 3 titles in a row... or at least contention ? so.... 14 years in row of contention then isn't a dynasty ? and Nebraska never won 3 in a row so.... or right you contended.... now I see why you added that in there, so Nebraska could benefit from it

My definition of you is you haven't a clue

Nebraska did not have a tougher road to hoe and that was clear by the fact that 6 out of the 8 times they played FSU they lost

i provided the stats earlier in this thread, but fsu played a tougher schedule.

they played more year end top25 opp, and did better against them.

same thing for bowl opp.

here it is again.

vs bowl teams:
1. Florida St. (49-13-1)--0.78571
2. Nebraska (39-14-1)--0.73148

fsu played the 2nd most bowl opponent in nation at 63
neb wasn't in top 25 for nation for most bowl opp at 54

vs top 25 (year end rank) opp:
1. Florida St. (38-12-1)--0.75490
2. Nebraska (28-15-1)--0.64773

fsu played 2nd most year end ranked teams at 51
neb was 11th at 44

and for good measure:

fsu played most top 10 year end ranked opp (by 5 games, that's almost 20% of total games vs top 10), and had highest win% in nation vs those opp.
neb played 6th most, had 2nd best win%.

1. Florida 30-(12-17-1)--0.41667
2. Notre Dame 25-(7-17-1)--0.30000
3. Michigan 24-(11-12-1)--0.47917
4. Florida St. 23-(12-10-1)--0.54348
4. Tennessee 23-(8-14-1)--0.36957
6. Nebraska 21-(11-10-0)--0.52381

vs top 5:

1. Florida 19-(7-11-1)--0.39474
2. Florida St. 14-(6-8-0)--0.42857
2. Miami (FL) 14-(5-9-0)--0.35714
2. Tennessee 14-(3-10-1)--0.25000
5. Iowa 12-(0-12-0)--0.00000
6. Michigan 11-(3-7-1)--0.31818
6. Nebraska 11-(3-8-0)--0.27273

fsu easily had highest win% vs top 5 opp, but played 2nd most in nation.

vs bcs conf opp:

1. Florida St. (95-13-1)--0.87615
2. Nebraska (92-16-1)--0.84862

both tied for 3rd most bcs conf opp, with fsu being better against them.

vs opp with winning record (>.500):
1. Florida St. 78-(64-13-1)--0.82692
33. Nebraska 63-(47-15-1)--0.75397

fsu and neb are 1/2 in win% vs opp with winning record, but this is sorted by # of opp faced with winning record. fsu #1, neb 33rd.

vs opp with .750+ win%:
1. Florida St. (28-10-1)--0.73077
3. Nebraska (20-12-0)--0.62500

fsu played 2nd most in nation
neb played 13th most

.

any way you slice it, fsu played as tough, or tougher, than anyone else in nation, including nebraska.

and they did better against the toughest competition than everyone else did against weaker (or at best, equal) competition.

if that isn't domination i don't know what is. and if that isn't a dynasty, there isn't one in cfb.

Fact is the NCAA recognize it as one of the 8 or 12 college football dynasties

You and your friends opinions on the matter don't change that fact so who gives a shit ? it was a dynasty, no matter what you say there are many that think and was and its been cemented into the record books as one, end of story

In 100 years some asshole will read about it being one of the great dynasties in college football, and nobody will remember what your opinion of it was

Also using the whole " my friend the ex-player " thing is gay, most players I knew were retarded as shit off the field and I certainly wouldn't care what their opinion was.... concerning anything, not just football

But you failed. FSU and Nebraska met three times in the 90's:

1990 Fiesta Bowl FSU 41 Nebraska 17
1993 Orange Bowl FSU 27 Nebraska 14
1994 Orange Bowl FSU 18 Nebraska 16

I was about to say that... he pretty much says the only difference is Nebraska has 3 titles and we have 2... but head to head and most wins, win %, and so forth all favor FSU... I say this makes it game,set,match......