The Blue Board

Ask my autocorrect

I thought OK State should have got in. That was a bullshit move by the BCS. Constant reasons to get rid of this crap system.

No team should play for a national title without being the best in their own conference. Everything else is just perception. If you're not even the best in your conference how can you be considered top 2 in the country? I think OK State would have won the national title last year if they got in. They got jobbed.

Oh absolutely. How could a team from a conference like the Big 12 possibly compete with the SEC big boys.
-signed, Texas A&M

I know and you guys won so easily by 5 points.

You are the one that said LSU would have easily beat Oklahoma St last year like it is some verifiable fact. A&M was in the bottom half of the pack in the Big 12 last year and have come into the SEC and inserted themselves into the upper echelon of the conference. Oklahoma St could have just as easily beat LSU as you are insiuating LSU would have beat them.

It really was a slap in the face to Ok State AND LSU. LSU had to play Georgia while Bama sat at home picking their ass. LSU had one of the greatest seasons in history ruined by the biased media. Bama had no business being put into that game. One of the biggest travesties in CFB history.

We had our opportunities and did not get it done and to be honest I do not think we are consistent enough to play in a BCS bowl unless we finish the last three games strong.

But a middling 6-7 bottom feeding Big 12 team comes in and runs the SEC? lullz

OU is 10th in the computer polls and 12th in both human polls. They have 2 good losses and 3 wins against the top 30 in the Sagarin Ratings.

They definitely should be ahead of South Carolina and Clemson based on that, IMO.

I wouldn't argue with the 2 loss teams of LSU, OU, Texas A&M, and Stanford being in any order, but all 4 should be ahead of South Carolina and Clemson, although I would say that LSU has the 2 most impressive wins this season so far with Scar and aTm.

Saying in general. don't think OU would put up a lot of points on a SEC defense. Dink and dunk, throw it 45 times a game doesn't do jack against this league. LSU proved it and Florida proved it in national title games. Notre Dame proved it this year.

I'm actually baffled how far away from a defensive standpoint Stoops has fallen. Dude has mediocre defenses every year and it seems as if offense is all he's worried about.

I agree that is the problem with OU. When they were on top of the world, their defenses were insanely good. Now they are good, but not even close to the level they were 2000-2003 or so.

On paper, OU should be higher is all my point really was. Can't punish them for looking bad when they still have had good results this season. If we went just on how things looked, Florida would have issues there as well.

Results have to mean something.