-
Ducksworth said...
How does what one coach achieved mean anything? There are many other coaches who coached here and won nattys and bowl games. And how do individual accomplishments equate to team success? We have three Heismans and that's fine with me. If you count the POTY before the Heisman was made, we'd have at least 10.
Most wins, 11 nattys, highest winning percentage, hardest SOS all-time... There's no way we're not top 3.
star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9030 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- All American
- (15597)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9030 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- All American
- (15597)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9030 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- All American
- (15597)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9030 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- All American
- (15597)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Ducksworth said...
1901-1904, 1918, 1923, 1932-1933, 1947-1948, 1997.
Yeah they were a while ago but that doesn't affect being a blue blood by definition of the term "blue blood"
Good lord! One title in sixty plus years, wow.. The legendary Bo was good for a big ol' fat 0.
doesn't seem that legendary to me.. I'll put you guys fourth behind ND, USC, and BAMA. star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MildReTIDEation said...
Furthermore, Michgan's bowl record is below .500 (20-21) and its Rose Bowl record is dreadful (8-12).
Now that I researched it a little bit, I think Michigan's status as Blue Blood needs to be strongly reconsidered.
That's humorous. Good luck finding anyone that agrees with you. If Michigan isn't a blue blood, then you don't know what a blue blood is. I'm not saying we,re one of the best teams now. We're not. But we are one of the best programs of all time. Ask anyone here. Did you notice how Michigan was brought up by every single person ITT?
And your bowl fact is stupid. NDs bowl record is 15-16.
Michigan has dominated the SEC and had the longest bowl streak until three years ago. Plus, still the highest winning percentage and most wins.
Pathetic troll attempt
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9030 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- All American
- (15597)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ducksworth said...
That's humorous. Good luck finding anyone that agrees with you. If Michigan isn't a blue blood, then you don't know what a blue blood is. I'm not saying we,re one of the best teams now. We're not. But we are one of the best programs of all time. Ask anyone here. Did you notice how Michigan was brought up by every single person ITT?
And your bowl fact is stupid. NDs bowl record is 15-16.
Michigan has dominated the SEC and had the longest bowl streak until three years ago. Plus, still the highest winning percentage and most wins.
Pathetic troll attempt
definitely fourth.. star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9030 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- All American
- (15597)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
FLOBama
- 4 stars Rating: 78
822 votes total - Varsity
- (1093)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ducksworth said...
That's humorous. Good luck finding anyone that agrees with you. If Michigan isn't a blue blood, then you don't know what a blue blood is. I'm not saying we,re one of the best teams now. We're not. But we are one of the best programs of all time. Ask anyone here. Did you notice how Michigan was brought up by every single person ITT?
And your bowl fact is stupid. NDs bowl record is 15-16.
Michigan has dominated the SEC and had the longest bowl streak until three years ago. Plus, still the highest winning percentage and most wins.
Pathetic troll attempt
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
IrishImpact said...
Again, are we just talking titles? Consistency? Fanbase? Academic standards? Oversigning? Lower SEC standards in this era? If everything we could think of got thrown into a pot, mixed around, and pulled out, ND is the team that would come out on top. No question.
Team All-Time Rankings
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/rankings/all_time_team_rankings.php
www.cfbdatawarehouse.comTalHawkins112 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1529 votes total - Walk-on
- (2588)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
TalHawkins112 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1529 votes total - Walk-on
- (2588)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MildReTIDEation
- 4 stars Rating: 72
805 votes total - Varsity
- (1567)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
star69 said...
That's all fine and dandy, but you don't have anywhere close to the # of AA, Heisman winners, HOF coaches, HOF's in general, or players drafted into the league.
Meh, individual awards don't bother me, they've historically been very political.
Speaking of politics, do you think that had something to do with Bama not getting the '66 title when they were the only undefeated, untied team in the country?
And if you want to bring in those things ( though I doubt we're very far behind in AA's ) I'll bring up the fact ND hasn't been good in 20+ years. Bama has 3 titles since the last time ND has won one.
You're still a Blue Blood, but you'll lose it if you keep underacheiving.
TalHawkins112 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1529 votes total - Walk-on
- (2588)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
TalHawkins112 said...
Meh, individual awards don't bother me, they've historically been very political.
Speaking of politics, do you think that had something to do with Bama not getting the '66 title when they were the only undefeated, untied team in the country?
And if you want to bring in those things ( though I doubt we're very far behind in AA's ) I'll bring up the fact ND hasn't been good in 20+ years. Bama has 3 titles since the last time ND has won one.
You're still a Blue Blood, but you'll lose it if you keep underacheiving.
star69 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5380 votes total - Heisman
- (22621)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
I wouldn't go that far.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
Is Penn State really a Blue Blood?