Online Now 3742

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2357
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3853
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Mitt Romney...... They really expect us to vote for him?

  • joetheogre said...

    "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims]"

    This line comes verbatim from a treaty that was endorsed by Washington, signed by John Adams, and ratified unanimously (imagine that) by the Senate, many of whom were "founding fathers" and had helped establish the US.

    The government wanted to be absolutely clear that we were not founded in religion and that religion would not dictate our foreign policy.

    the most important post in this thread right here

    earlier I asked what religion has to do with politics and the american government...no response from anyone

    the answer to that question is nothing...

    oh and the "one nation under god" didn't come about til the 20th century

    signature image signature image signature image

    University of Oklahoma: B.S. Aerospace Engineering '10, M.S. Mechanical Engineering '12

    greensooner

  • joetheogre said...

    "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims]"

    This line comes verbatim from a treaty that was endorsed by Washington, signed by John Adams, and ratified unanimously (imagine that) by the Senate, many of whom were "founding fathers" and had helped establish the US.

    The government wanted to be absolutely clear that we were not founded in religion and that religion would not dictate our foreign policy.

    He ever said the US was founded on religion. He said "principles" and it most certainly was.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DrStache

  • These men who wrote the constitution used their spiritual values when they wrote those basic laws. Some were Christian, some weren't but thu all believed in a higher power and that higher power is what they founded their own values from and then they took their values and applied it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DrStache

  • Mr.Stache said...

    These men who wrote the constitution used their spiritual values when they wrote those basic laws. Some were Christian, some weren't but thu all believed in a higher power and that higher power is what they founded their own values from and then they took their values and applied it.

    I don't think you can make that assumption about their beliefs and I don't think you should in this discussion. I think you're reaching with that one

    signature image signature image signature image

    University of Oklahoma: B.S. Aerospace Engineering '10, M.S. Mechanical Engineering '12

    greensooner

  • Mr.Stache said...

    These men who wrote the constitution used their spiritual values when they wrote those basic laws. Some were Christian, some weren't but thu all believed in a higher power and that higher power is what they founded their own values from and then they took their values and applied it.

    "that higher power is what they founded their own values from"

    No. No no no. Not only is this untrue, but it's incredibly arrogant to think that the values each of the founding fathers' possessed came solely from spiritual beliefs.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • greensooner said...

    I don't think you can make that assumption about their beliefs and I don't think you should in this discussion. I think you're reaching with that one

    I'm not reaching. Now, whether or not their beliefs were really given from a higher power is debatable in some eyes. But their basic values were derived from their beliefs and those had to have a lot of clout when they wrote the constitution. IMO of course.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DrStache

  • Mr.Stache said...

    I'm not reaching. Now, whether or not their beliefs were really given from a higher power is debatable in some eyes. But their basic values were derived from their beliefs and those had to have a lot of clout when they wrote the constitution. IMO of course.

    Absolutely. As a matter of fact the "rights" everyone claims as personal and sovereign were specifically stated to be "endowed upon them by their Creator" .... Capital C lending itself to a Person.

    Raging Bull

  • Mr.Stache said...

    I'm not reaching. Now, whether or not their beliefs were really given from a higher power is debatable in some eyes. But their basic values were derived from their beliefs and those had to have a lot of clout when they wrote the constitution. IMO of course.

    "IMO of course" is all you needed to add and I would have responded

    I think that saying you know what those men who wrote the constitution (225 years ago) were thinking and believed in is reaching to make your point. It should never be asserted that anyone knows what people from over 2 centuries ago were thinking or based their decisions off of.

    signature image signature image signature image

    University of Oklahoma: B.S. Aerospace Engineering '10, M.S. Mechanical Engineering '12

    greensooner

  • CMXI said...

    Our society has defined what we, as a society, view as right and wrong by instituting our laws. Personally, I don't think smoking marijuana is wrong, but society has deemed it to be wrong. If a person wants to participate in society, then they should abide by its laws, and if they fail to do so, they deserve to be punished. If the laws are unjust, then enough of society raises up and creates new laws, reflective of what that current iteration of society views as right and wrong.

    So, in answer to your loaded hypothetical, yes, you or I have grounds to punish this man because we (as a society) think his actions are wrong.

    Im not talking about laws.... you can make a law about anything... Im talking about morals/values... laws unto themselves in the heart of humanity that need no written law to determine right or wrong.... murder, rape, child abuse... these are universally known even when they arent adhered to... they're stated this way..."you know you ought not do that".... how do we know this? Its the moral "ought" or obligation we have toward humanity placed in the heart of man... it has become jaded and distorted through the continual practice of sin, nevertheless its still there.....

    Raging Bull

  • joetheogre said...

    No historical evidence to back this up.

    The Romans did fine without Christianity for centuries. Bourbon France and Imperial Spain were highly religious and yet they ultimately failed.

    We my friend are living in the proof... sit back and watch what happened to every other world empire (and thats what we were)... not to the extent of conquering land and people groups for the sole reason of expansion of course... but we are imploding... morally, financially, and relationally.... and the people on this board thinks a new President will change it? That is whats laughable.....

    Raging Bull

  • OmegaBuckeye said...

    There is no overiding morality that can be derived from the bible. No definition of Good. Some of the things that god calls good in the bible are atrocious. As a matter of fact, the morality changes in the bible depending on the writer.

    Wrong. Love is the over riding morality in the bible. Remember the Golden Rule?
    Treat others the way you would want them to treat you....that is an eternal value, not the result of mans evolution of morality

    Raging Bull

  • greensooner said...

    "IMO of course" is all you needed to add and I would have responded

    I think that saying you know what those men who wrote the constitution (225 years ago) were thinking and believed in is reaching to make your point. It should never be asserted that anyone knows what people from over 2 centuries ago were thinking or based their decisions off of.

    Exactly. I just basing this on m opinion of the men and what they've wrote. Here's a few examples.........

    John Adams: "

    The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were. . . . the general principles of Christianity. . . . I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God; and that those principles of liberty are as unalterable as human nature."

    Again, John Adams( the whole quote): letter to Thomas Jefferson

    "Twenty times in the course of my late reading have I been on the point of breaking out, "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion at all!!!" But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell."

    Samuel Adams: this is from "rights of the colonist as Christians"......

    "II. The Rights of the Colonists as Christians.

    The right to freedom being the gift of the Almighty...The rights of the colonists as Christians...may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institutions of The Great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament.

    In his Last Will and Testament he wrote:

    Principally, and first of all, I resign my soul to the Almighty Being who gave it, and my body I commit to the dust, relying on the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of my sins."

    Ben Franklin. A self proclaimed deist wrote this 5 months before his death......"

    I believe in one God, the Creator of the universe; that he governs it by his Providence; that be ought to be worshipped; that the. most acceptable service we can render to him is doing good to his other children; that the soul of man is immortal, and will be treated with justice in another life respecting its conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental points of all sound religion, and I regard them as you do, in whatever sect I meet with them. As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think his system of morals and his religion, as be left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is like to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some doubts as to his divinity; though it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it."

    This last one is the most surprising and I really think this proves that at the very least, Hamilton shaped all views on life through religion......

    Alexander Hamilton......

    "Alexander Hamilton

    The Episcopalian authored many of the Federalist Papers, signed the Constitution, and became the first Secretary of the Treasury. In an April 1802 letter to James A. Bayard, Hamilton proposed The Christian Constitutional Society:

    In my opinion, the present constitution is the standard to which we are to cling. Under its banner bona fide must we combat our political foes, rejecting all changes but through the channel itself provided for amendments. By these general views of the subject have my reflections been guided. I now offer you the outline of the plan they have suggested. Let an association be formed to be denominated "The Christian Constitutional Society," its object to be first: The support of the Christian religion. second: The support of the United States."

    So, I certainly can't speak for these guys 250 years ago but I don't think it's a reach to say that their views of America, reflected them and what their views of a society should be. I think they all believed that everything decent about themselves came from a higher power and our country was beautifully shaped by what these men wrote. That's all I'm saying.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DrStache

  • Mr.Stache said...

    These men who wrote the constitution used their spiritual values when they wrote those basic laws. Some were Christian, some weren't but thu all believed in a higher power and that higher power is what they founded their own values from and then they took their values and applied it.

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • Mr.Stache said...

    Exactly. I just basing this on m opinion of the men and what they've wrote. Here's a few examples.........

    Look Mom, I can do this too!

    James Madison

    "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise." - letter to Wm. Bradford, April 1, 1774

    "Ecclesiastical establishments tend to great ignorance and corruption, all of which facilitate the execution of mischievous projects."

    "The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries." - 1803 letter objecting use of gov. land for churches.

    John Adams:

    "I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved-- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!" - letter to Thomas Jefferson

    "The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find a precept for Creeds, Confessions, Oaths, Doctrines, and whole cartloads of other foolish trumpery that we find in Christianity."

    ". . . Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."

    Thomas Jefferson:

    "The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs." - Letter to James Smith, December 8, 1822

    "In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot ... they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer engine for their purpose." - to Horatio Spafford, March 17, 1814

    "We discover in the gospels a groundwork of vulgar ignorance, of things impossible, of superstition, fanaticism and fabrication ."

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • Mr.Stache said...

    Exactly. I just basing this on m opinion of the men and what they've wrote. Here's a few examples.........

    John Adams: "

    The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were. . . . the general principles of Christianity. . . . I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God; and that those principles of liberty are as unalterable as human nature."

    Again, John Adams( the whole quote): letter to Thomas Jefferson

    "Twenty times in the course of my late reading have I been on the point of breaking out, "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion at all!!!" But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell."

    Samuel Adams: this is from "rights of the colonist as Christians"......

    "II. The Rights of the Colonists as Christians.

    The right to freedom being the gift of the Almighty...The rights of the colonists as Christians...may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institutions of The Great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament.

    In his Last Will and Testament he wrote:

    Principally, and first of all, I resign my soul to the Almighty Being who gave it, and my body I commit to the dust, relying on the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of my sins."

    Ben Franklin. A self proclaimed deist wrote this 5 months before his death......"

    I believe in one God, the Creator of the universe; that he governs it by his Providence; that be ought to be worshipped; that the. most acceptable service we can render to him is doing good to his other children; that the soul of man is immortal, and will be treated with justice in another life respecting its conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental points of all sound religion, and I regard them as you do, in whatever sect I meet with them. As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think his system of morals and his religion, as be left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is like to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some doubts as to his divinity; though it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it."

    This last one is the most surprising and I really think this proves that at the very least, Hamilton shaped all views on life through religion......

    Alexander Hamilton......

    "Alexander Hamilton

    The Episcopalian authored many of the Federalist Papers, signed the Constitution, and became the first Secretary of the Treasury. In an April 1802 letter to James A. Bayard, Hamilton proposed The Christian Constitutional Society:

    In my opinion, the present constitution is the standard to which we are to cling. Under its banner bona fide must we combat our political foes, rejecting all changes but through the channel itself provided for amendments. By these general views of the subject have my reflections been guided. I now offer you the outline of the plan they have suggested. Let an association be formed to be denominated "The Christian Constitutional Society," its object to be first: The support of the Christian religion. second: The support of the United States."

    So, I certainly can't speak for these guys 250 years ago but I don't think it's a reach to say that their views of America, reflected them and what their views of a society should be. I think they all believed that everything decent about themselves came from a higher power and our country was beautifully shaped by what these men wrote. That's all I'm saying.

    Amen Stache

    Raging Bull

  • Raging Bull said...

    Wrong. Love is the over riding morality in the bible. Remember the Golden Rule? Treat others the way you would want them to treat you....that is an eternal value, not the result of mans evolution of morality

    Go find that in the old testament. I'm sure it was there in the instructions on how much you can beat your slaves in the new testament as well.

    This post was edited by OmegaBuckeye on 9/18/2012 at 8:09 PM

    We are both atheists. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours

    OmegaBuckeye

  • Lesser of two evils?? I don't see that we have much choice!!!! Our country cannot take four more years of Mr Obama. Our country needs to be run as a business. (Balancing the budget, etc)

    The real problem is term limits with our senators and congressmen. Some of them have been there forever! They vote in a way to keep their position, not for the good of our country. Our Governors and our President all have term limits, the others should. Maybe the entire lot of them would actually get something done if they knew they had a had a limited time in DC. Also, they live most of the year in Washington with the other politicians and they are completely out of touch with reality!

    mlpw

  • My vote will be for Mitt.
    My main reason is I'm tired of everybody on welfare and Obama wants everybody on it.
    It's modern day slavery
    He wants people so dependent on government that they will be scared not to vote Dem
    Laziness and being fat is not a handicap. Get off your ass & quit making 5 kids with no job or husband.
    They need to take a drug test if your on welfare.

    I rather have Mitt than Obama

    This post was edited by MissState41 on 9/19/2012 at 9:22 AM

    MissState41

  • mlpw said...

    Lesser of two evils?? I don't see that we have much choice!!!! Our country cannot take four more years of Mr Obama. Our country needs to be run as a business. (Balancing the budget, etc)

    Presidents with the most business experience:

    Jimmy Carter
    George W Bush
    Herbert Hoover

    President with little to no business experience:

    Bill Clinton
    Ronald Reagan
    Teddy Roosevelt
    Woodrow Wilson

    Seems to be little to no correlation between the two. FWIW I agree with your point on term limits.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • Just saw this article and thought some people in this thread would like to read it

    Will Science Someday Rule Out the Possibility of God? - Yahoo! News

    From Yahoo! News: Over the past few centuries, science can be said to have gradually chipped away at the traditional grounds for believing in God. Much of what once seemed mysterious — the existence of humanity, the life-bearing perfection of Earth, the workings of the universe — can now be explained by biology, astronomy, physics and other domains of science. 

    news.yahoo.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    MZizzle2

  • MissState41 said...

    My vote will be for Mitt. My main reason is I'm tired of everybody on welfare and Obama wants everybody on it. It's modern day slavery He wants people so dependent on government that they will be scared not to vote Dem Laziness and being fat is not a handicap. Get off your ass & quit making 5 kids with no job or husband. They need to take a drug test if your on welfare. I'm not putting this election on social issues it needs to be a business issue. I rather have Mitt than Obama

    "I'm tired of everybody on welfare...It's modern dat slavery...Dem Laziness...drug test if your on welfare..."

    - a few lines later -

    "I'm not putting this election on social issues"

    Wait, what? huh

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • MZizzle2 said...

    Just saw this article and thought some people in this thread would like to read it

    Why? Doesn't pertain in any way to the topic.

    VTSmitty

  • VTSmitty said...

    Why? Doesn't pertain in any way to the topic.

    Most of the posts in this thread are about God and religion. I think an article about God would fit in that conversation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MZizzle2

  • MZizzle2 said...

    Most of the posts in this thread are about God and religion. I think an article about God would fit in that conversation.

    Good point. Post away, and God bless you.

    VTSmitty