-
TalHawkins112
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1556 votes total - Walk-on
- (2622)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Hoffelcopter
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1396 votes total - Back-up
- (4783)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TalHawkins112
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1556 votes total - Walk-on
- (2622)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
ErnieMcCracken
- 4 stars Rating: 63
5349 votes total - Starter
- (7562)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BushidoNole ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4657 votes total - Starter
- (9101)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Aussie
- 5 stars Rating: 86
5508 votes total - General of tBBWC
- Heisman
- (41591)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lesticals
- 5 stars Rating: 86
6313 votes total - LSU Team site MOD .
- All American
- (17970)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Aussie
- 5 stars Rating: 86
5508 votes total - General of tBBWC
- Heisman
- (41591)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lesticals
- 5 stars Rating: 86
6313 votes total - LSU Team site MOD .
- All American
- (17970)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Aussie
- 5 stars Rating: 86
5508 votes total - General of tBBWC
- Heisman
- (41591)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
boxybrown
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1014 votes total - Kung Fu Treachery
- Redshirt
- (3878)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
callen05
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1950 votes total - Chicago Ain't No Sissy Town
- Starter
- (6777)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BuddyHolly ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
3960 votes total - Zach .
- Starter
- (9786)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TalHawkins112
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1556 votes total - Walk-on
- (2622)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
ButchCassidy ●
- 5 stars Rating: 81
297 votes total - Varsity
- (1679)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
T I G E R73080
- 3 stars Rating: 49
3284 votes total - "Your arms off!" "No it isn't."
- Redshirt
- (3395)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
SimplyComplex
- 4 stars Rating: 74
5048 votes total - All Conference
- (13316)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MarineMountie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3982 votes total - tBBWC 2nd Lieutenant
- All American
- (17610)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
T I G E R73080
- 3 stars Rating: 49
3284 votes total - "Your arms off!" "No it isn't."
- Redshirt
- (3395)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
T I G E R said...
I don't care if BF's engine was created in 2046, it looks like you're playing Goldeneye on a Nintendo 64.
I like the map interactivity (and size) of BF3, but in terms of graphics or game feel --- MW3 kraps all over BF. There's a reason MW3 was sold 6.5 million times on day one while BF3 sold 5 million over the first seven days. I am an old school Halo/Halo 2 player and MW3 provides similar game play so that's what I play. BF3 certainly has it's pros as well.
Aussie
- 5 stars Rating: 86
5508 votes total - General of tBBWC
- Heisman
- (41591)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
callen05
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1950 votes total - Chicago Ain't No Sissy Town
- Starter
- (6777)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
T I G E R said...
I don't care if BF's engine was created in 2046, it looks like you're playing Goldeneye on a Nintendo 64.
I like the map interactivity (and size) of BF3, but in terms of graphics or game feel --- MW3 kraps all over BF. There's a reason MW3 was sold 6.5 million times on day one while BF3 sold 5 million over the first seven days. I am an old school Halo/Halo 2 player and MW3 provides similar game play so that's what I play. BF3 certainly has it's pros as well.
MarineMountie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3982 votes total - tBBWC 2nd Lieutenant
- All American
- (17610)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MarineMountie said...
What you are seeing is the difference in frames per second. COD runs at 60 because there is nothing to that game. Tiny maps, no vehicles, not many players in the match, ect... battlefield runs at 30 frames per second because there is a lot more to the game. Huge maps, vehicles, 24 player servers, ect... Battlefield graphics > COD graphics, but COD is smoother because its less of a game and they can have a higher frames per second because of that.
Now, the reason COD sold that many is because that game is a fad. People buy it just because their friends are. Hell, the 2 days I had it(seriously, 2 days) the only thing I heard on the mic were people saying that same thing. They hate the game, they just play it because its what their friends do. Also keep in mind that COD caters to kids and the casual player. Battlefield is a harder FPS, which turns away the kids(thank God) and casual player. Kids dominate the COD market because its easy.
Aussie
- 5 stars Rating: 86
5508 votes total - General of tBBWC
- Heisman
- (41591)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SimplyComplex
- 4 stars Rating: 74
5048 votes total - All Conference
- (13316)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MarineMountie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3982 votes total - tBBWC 2nd Lieutenant
- All American
- (17610)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4






















Modern Warfare