-
Aussie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5319 votes total - Valar Morghulis
- Heisman
- (40310)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MarineMountie said...
What you are seeing is the difference in frames per second. COD runs at 60 because there is nothing to that game. Tiny maps, no vehicles, not many players in the match, ect... battlefield runs at 30 frames per second because there is a lot more to the game. Huge maps, vehicles, 24 player servers, ect... Battlefield graphics > COD graphics, but COD is smoother because its less of a game and they can have a higher frames per second because of that.
Now, the reason COD sold that many is because that game is a fad. People buy it just because their friends are. Hell, the 2 days I had it(seriously, 2 days) the only thing I heard on the mic were people saying that same thing. They hate the game, they just play it because its what their friends do. Also keep in mind that COD caters to kids and the casual player. Battlefield is a harder FPS, which turns away the kids(thank God) and casual player. Kids dominate the COD market because its easy.
T I G E R73080
- 3 stars Rating: 49
3284 votes total - "Your arms off!" "No it isn't."
- Redshirt
- (3395)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
SimplyComplex
- 4 stars Rating: 74
5047 votes total - All Conference
- (13316)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Aussie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5319 votes total - Valar Morghulis
- Heisman
- (40310)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Aussie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5319 votes total - Valar Morghulis
- Heisman
- (40310)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MarineMountie
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3903 votes total - Twitter: @MarineMounty247
- All American
- (17150)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SimplyComplex
- 4 stars Rating: 74
5047 votes total - All Conference
- (13316)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Aussie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5319 votes total - Valar Morghulis
- Heisman
- (40310)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
T I G E R73080
- 3 stars Rating: 49
3284 votes total - "Your arms off!" "No it isn't."
- Redshirt
- (3395)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
SimplyComplex
- 4 stars Rating: 74
5047 votes total - All Conference
- (13316)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MarineMountie said...
Not defensive, just knowledgeable about the demographics of both games. COD targets kids so they get those sales. Battlefield targets the more skilled player, so they get less sales, but still sell millions. Nothing wrong with either strategy, IMO. Nickelback breaks sales records....
TalHawkins112 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1528 votes total - Walk-on
- (2587)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Lesticals
- 5 stars Rating: 86
6145 votes total - LSU Team site MOD .
- All American
- (17472)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Aussie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5319 votes total - Valar Morghulis
- Heisman
- (40310)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TalHawkins112 said...
Ya see, this is just a condescending, asinine remark. It implies people who play COD are less skilled, which is not necessarily true.
Also, they both appeal to mostly the same audiences, it's a preference thing as to which people prefer. There's no way they could market only to 'skilled' players anyway.
T I G E R73080
- 3 stars Rating: 49
3284 votes total - "Your arms off!" "No it isn't."
- Redshirt
- (3395)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
MarineMountie
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3903 votes total - Twitter: @MarineMounty247
- All American
- (17150)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Ichabod ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
5999 votes total - 2012 Gump of the Year/ King Gump
- Heisman
- (30356)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Eeid
- 5 stars Rating: 87
561 votes total - Letterman
- (1807)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
COOTERUSC77
- 5 stars Rating: 85
3424 votes total - Do..or do not. There is no try.
- Starter
- (7583)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MoreNCsThanU
- 3 stars Rating: 60
3588 votes total - Letterman
- (1920)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
COOTERUSC77
- 5 stars Rating: 85
3424 votes total - Do..or do not. There is no try.
- Starter
- (7583)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BuddyHolly
- 5 stars Rating: 93
3882 votes total - Zach .
- Starter
- (9674)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
wegotmore ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
98 votes total - Freshman
- (242)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TalHawkins112 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
1528 votes total - Walk-on
- (2587)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GoingLightBarny ●
- 4 stars Rating: 69
4528 votes total - sorry, i have Tourrette's
- All American
- (15994)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
COOTERUSC77 said...
COD sucks a bag of dicks. Watered down with killstreaks, 12 year olds cursing everyone and throwing hissy fits, campers everywhere, no team play whatsoever, and terrible map layout. Battlefield is superior to COD in every way. It's been the same game/engine for six straight years..what a joke.
GoingLightBarny ●
- 4 stars Rating: 69
4528 votes total - sorry, i have Tourrette's
- All American
- (15994)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4























Modern Warfare