-
Murrdawg69
- 4 stars Rating: 71
3030 votes total - Redshirt
- (3710)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
dustelli ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
864 votes total - Walk-on
- (2613)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
dustelli said...
We are losing two OL and one of them was a turd. In case you haven't noticed we seem to do pretty OK on the OL. Just leave it alone. you don't even know the kid. High character and wants his degree. He's not one of those "make it rain" tat dudes.
callen05
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1877 votes total - Starter
- (6374)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
callen05 said...
I'm sure hes a good dude, but a decent rookie contract can set the smart person up for life.
High character and making a smart career choice are not mutually exclusive.
This post was edited by Murrdawg69 on 1/10/2012 at 12:30 PM
Murrdawg69
- 4 stars Rating: 71
3030 votes total - Redshirt
- (3710)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
HobnailedBoots
- 5 stars Rating: 85
3006 votes total - Walk-on
- (2825)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
irishyoung
- 5 stars Rating: 83
4270 votes total - Heisman
- (21584)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
highspeed
- 5 stars Rating: 82
302 votes total - Varsity
- (1077)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
highspeed said...
He said the NFL people told him he needs to be a little bigger, as he is not a burner. So he is going to gain 10 LBs of muscle while maintaining his explosiveness. In theory this will make him more attractive to NFL (as you know they seem to be obsessed with measurables).
We actually return 2 starters on the OL, plus two guys who filled in for parts of this season and last. He won't score 39 TDs, but he should do alright.
Beyond the risk of getting injured, that rookie contract for a RB is what matters. It seems few teams will resign a guy for more money after 4 or 5 years, so that first contract has to be maxed out. A risk for sure, but a justifiable risk.
Murrdawg69
- 4 stars Rating: 71
3030 votes total - Redshirt
- (3710)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Macks ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7257 votes total - Starter
- (9427)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
fsufsu
- 4 stars Rating: 67
9382 votes total - All American
- (18162)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
dustelli ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
864 votes total - Walk-on
- (2613)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
steveschneider
- 4 stars Rating: 72
3418 votes total - Steve Schneider
- Starter
- (7402)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
shavisimo2 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
6501 votes total - All Conference
- (12233)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PTCcock195 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
7951 votes total - All Conference
- (10836)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Harry Callahan ●
- 4 stars Rating: 71
5707 votes total - Starter
- (5088)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
duvalnole
- 4 stars Rating: 70
3654 votes total - All Conference
- (13097)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
dustelli ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
864 votes total - Walk-on
- (2613)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
dustelli said...
despite what the earlier MSU hater said there is truth to RB situation here. Some have had limited success, some have flamed out, and some have totally busted. I think Montee is somewhat different, but still has something to prove to the skeptics. Have to remember he was 3rd string at one time last year and changed his body this season. Either way he may still be a back that if in the right system could look look like a top 15 pick, but also look look like a practice squad player in the wrong setup. Much like Dayne and the Giants. Funny how the system we run doesn't seem to hurt the guys blocking for him. Our backups go on to be starters.
Harry Callahan ●
- 4 stars Rating: 71
5707 votes total - Starter
- (5088)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Batesianmimicry
- 5 stars Rating: 83
2894 votes total - To Dare is to Do
- Starter
- (5714)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
msudawg12 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
1953 votes total - Omaha Bound
- Starter
- (8894)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
highspeed said...
He said the NFL people told him he needs to be a little bigger, as he is not a burner. So he is going to gain 10 LBs of muscle while maintaining his explosiveness. In theory this will make him more attractive to NFL (as you know they seem to be obsessed with measurables).
We actually return 2 starters on the OL, plus two guys who filled in for parts of this season and last. He won't score 39 TDs, but he should do alright.
Beyond the risk of getting injured, that rookie contract for a RB is what matters. It seems few teams will resign a guy for more money after 4 or 5 years, so that first contract has to be maxed out. A risk for sure, but a justifiable risk.
This post was edited by RATT on 1/10/2012 at 8:48 PM
RATT
- 5 stars Rating: 83
1939 votes total - King of the Alcoholics
- All Conference
- (10065)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SinisterOne said...
To be fair, He could easily add that muscle before the combine. I'm shocked that he is graded as a third rounder after the year he had. He could add ten pounds of muscle in a month easily and still have almost three months before the combine to learn how to keep his speed and explosiveness with that added weight. Without Wilson and a couple of OL'men he is not going to have the year he had this year. If all he needs is to bulk up, I would suggest he just do that and show out at the combine.
Harry Callahan ●
- 4 stars Rating: 71
5707 votes total - Starter
- (5088)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Macks ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7257 votes total - Starter
- (9427)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RATT
- 5 stars Rating: 83
1939 votes total - King of the Alcoholics
- All Conference
- (10065)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RATT
- 5 stars Rating: 83
1939 votes total - King of the Alcoholics
- All Conference
- (10065)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars













Monte Ball has to go pro