The Blue Board

Jury won't even explain themselves to the public. Refused to meet press.

Hopefully someone beats the shit out of all them in the parking lot.

Not trying to start a flame war, just a conversation. So do you think it was okay for her to wrap her 2 year old daughters body in trash bags, toss her into the woods, and let animals eat on her decaying carcass while she was out partying?

Now I'm not saying either way if she's guilty or not... personally I think she is... but she went before a jury of her peers and was found not guilty. If you're going to call yourself a real American you have to support the decision, as wrong as you think it may be, because it was done fairly and judiciously. If you don't like the way it went down maybe it's time to overhaul the justice system a bit.

No i don't think that's okay and for that i would like to see her seek a good amount of time for that.But going back to the prosecution ,they didn't prove with out a shadow of doubt that the young lady did any of this.If so it's possible she could of been found guilty on atleast one of those major charges.

Be sarcastic all you want, but as much as I don't like the verdict and think she's guilty, my opinion and agenda are not worth more than a fair and judicious trial. The fact so many Americans seem to not care about the latter scares the hell out of me.

They claimed the child accidentally drowned, but why didn't she call 911?

The kid was found in a garbage bag with ducttape over the kid's face. This was a clear murder. The real sad part about this is that the jury wouldn't convict without CSI-type scientific evidence, which is pathetic when the DNA evidence was compromised by the length of time the body was not found.

Hell, the kid was found with ducttape over her face, but this jury found her guilty of child abuse.

Pathetic. The jury should be ashamed of their lack of common sense and stupidity about CSI-type evidence. People don't understand that there aren't fingerprints, hairs, and semen on everything when a crime is committed.

(Edit: The sheriff is on TV telling people not to riot. Don't riot, guys. )

Anyone who thinks she is innocent or saying "well they didn't have enough evidence or you don't know what happened" can go play in the traffic bc you are worthless.

Dave Chapelle's FWIW.

That is just sad dude,no offense,everyone in your eye is presumed guilty?Solid Evidence is what tells a juror if a person is guilty or not.

As I said before, I don't like the verdict. But like I also said before, she had AFAIK a fair trial infront of a jury of her peers and was found not guilty. Unless something comes out that the trial was somehow cheated or unfairly influenced, I will assume that justice by our definition was served. Moral justice is between her and her Creator.

Correct all she's been convicted of was lying to detectives and police about her daughter being deceased.I hate to say this dude prosecution based on forensic science couldn't prove she ducted tape her little girl and tossed her body in a wooded area.I believe she knows who killed her girl and the way she died.And she should serve more time,but they are giving her already time served which she could be out very soon.