Online Now 3352

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2016
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3352
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

OT: Since the feds can't seem to get the job done...

  • They're going after those who do, specifically Sheriff Arpaio, the guy in AZ who thinks prisoners are pretty in pink...

    PHOENIX (AP) — Federal authorities have said they plan to sue Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Latinos.
    The U.S. Justice Department has been seeking an agreement requiring Arpaio's office to train officers in how to make constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops and reach out to Latinos to assure them that the department is there to also protect them.
    Arpaio has denied the racial profiling allegations and has claimed that allowing a court monitor would mean that every policy decision would have to be cleared through an observer and would nullify his authority.
    DOJ officials told a lawyer for Arpaio on April 3 that the lawman's refusal of a court-appointed monitor was a deal-breaker that would end settlement negotiations and result in a federal lawsuit.
    The "notice of intent to file civil action" came Wednesday from Assistant U.S. Attorney General Thomas Perez in a letter to an Arpaio lawyer.
    Perez, who heads the DOJ's civil rights division, noted that it's been more than 100 days since the sheriff's office received the DOJ's findings report and federal authorities haven't met with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office counsel since Feb. 6 to discuss the terms of a consent agreement.
    At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, Arpaio defended himself in the face of the pending lawsuit.
    "If they sue, we'll go to court. And then we'll find out the real story," he said. "There's lots of miscommunication emanating from Washington. They broke off communications.
    "They're telling me how to run my organization. I'd like to get this resolved, but I'm not going to give up my authority to the federal government. It's as simple as that," Arpaio added.
    Last December, the DOJ released a scathing report accusing Arpaio's office of racially profiling Latinos, basing immigration enforcement on racially charged citizen complaints and punishing Hispanic jail inmates for speaking Spanish in Arizona's most populous county.
    The DOJ also accused Arpaio of having a culture of disregard for basic constitutional rights.
    The civil rights allegations have led some Arpaio critics to call for his resignation, including the National Council of La Raza, a prominent advocacy group for Latinos.
    The sheriff's office also is facing criticism over more than 400 sex-crimes investigations — including dozens of alleged child molestations — that hadn't been investigated adequately or weren't examined at all over a three-year period ending in 2007.
    Arpaio has apologized for the botched cases, reopened 432 sex-crimes investigations and made 19 arrests.
    Separate from the civil rights probe, a federal grand jury has been investigating Arpaio's office on criminal abuse-of-power allegations since at least December 2009. That grand jury is examining the investigative work of the sheriff's anti-public corruption squad.
    The self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America has been a national political fixture who has built his reputation on jailing inmates in tents and dressing them in pink underwear, selling himself to voters as unceasingly tough on crime and pushing the bounds of how far local police can go to confront illegal immigration.

    signature image

    PSUTE

  • If by "feds can't get it done" you mean that the Obama Administration has deported more illegals in the first 4 years than Bush did in 8 years, then yeah I agree..... Arpaio needs to learn how to do his job with a little less corruption.

    Bluekush

  • Bluekush said...

    If by "feds can't get it done" you mean that the Obama Administration has deported more illegals in the first 4 years than Bush did in 8 years, then yeah I agree..... Arpaio needs to learn how to do his job with a little less corruption.

    Sensitive much? I don't think the OP mentioned Obama.

    MildReTIDEation

  • Bluekush said...

    If by "feds can't get it done" you mean that the Obama Administration has deported more illegals in the first 4 years than Bush did in 8 years, then yeah I agree..... Arpaio needs to learn how to do his job with a little less corruption.

    BTW, Obama is actively working against legalizing Mary Jane. With a name like Bluekush, this that might be more important to you.

    MildReTIDEation

  • Bluekush said...

    If by "feds can't get it done" you mean that the Obama Administration has deported more illegals in the first 4 years than Bush did in 8 years, then yeah I agree..... Arpaio needs to learn how to do his job with a little less corruption.

    The economy has done more than anything to reverse the trend...

    signature image

    PSUTE

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    BTW, Obama is actively working against legalizing Mary Jane. With a name like Bluekush, this that might be more important to you.

    I am aware of this and it's quite a shame, but in the end it matters very little to me.

    Bluekush

  • The economy doesn't deport people, the federal government does. I won't disagree that the economy has played a huge factor in reducing the numbers of illegal immigrants migrating to (and from) our country in recent years, though.

    Bluekush

  • Bluekush said...

    The economy doesn't deport people, the federal government does. I won't disagree that the economy has played a huge factor in reducing the numbers of illegal immigrants migrating to (and from) our country in recent years, though.

    well, didnt take long..next uncleDP will be all up in it

    signature image signature image signature image

    Dawg E Style161

  • Arizona law requires that if you are not a U.S. citizen, you must have identification on you to prove you are in the country legally.

    Federal law requires that if you are not a U.S. citizen, you must have identification on you to prove you are in the country legally.

    And the federal government is suing Arizona because their law if unfair.

    I agree that the profiling is completely wrong. There is just no basis to believe that it is mainly Mexicans that enter the U.S. illegally from Mexico. Could be Canadians taking the scenic route.

    VTSmitty

  • VTSmitty said...

    Arizona law requires that if you are not a U.S. citizen, you must have identification on you to prove you are in the country legally.

    Federal law requires that if you are not a U.S. citizen, you must have identification on you to prove you are in the country legally.

    And the federal government is suing Arizona because their law if unfair.

    I agree that the profiling is completely wrong. There is just no basis to believe that it is mainly Mexicans that enter the U.S. illegally from Mexico. Could be Canadians taking the scenic route.

    No hables, Amercano...

    .

    signature image

    PSUTE