The Blue Board

Haven't heard from him since his last CD

Last election he said if he didn't get the job done then the American people should fire him. Did he change his mind on that one?

MrWoodson, I always thought we were on the opposite ends of the spectrum on this guy. I am happy to see that we are not.

It's scary how similar the two are.

Granholm's most infamous line from her 2006 re-election campaign was "in 5 years, you'll be blown away"

Some people were blown away, alright. Right of out state for better work opportunities, lower taxes, better schools, and ridiculously cheaper cost of living.

As I stated, the two are eerily similar.

I don't know how good Romney would be either, but I feel confident that he wouldn't be any worse. I'm willing to take that chance and try something different. I really think Paul Ryan is a sharp dude and would get things moving in the right direction. He just seems like a common sense guy.

Take one:
* he refused the wear an American flag pin or say the pledge correctly
* he dumped his own pastor, Rev Wright because (get this one...)he never heard anything he said during his sermons for over 20 years.
* he wore an American flag pin & said the pledge "as written".
* President Obama, in 2008, vowed that “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel & the US Embassy will be moved there.

Take two:
* his platform posse removed God & the recognition of Jerusalem in "their 2012 plans"
* wait,now he wants God & Jerusalem in his plans for 2012.
* the US Embassy is still in Tel Aviv, but Barrack said "i just need four more years to get things done."

Putin: I was making great progress with your former President Obama

Romney: Well, you can kiss that hope an change bullshit goodbye, and let me welcome you back to the real world.

Aw man you can't be serious. The guy is a classic Tea Party candidate. Does bipartisanship mean anything to you all in a candidate? You all blame Obama because things haven't magically been fixed from the complete shit show that was four years ago but don't put into context that more importantly Congress has been a majority of who? Republicans. There's no debating issues with the Tea Party. No country can flourish when one side is completely unwilling to work with the other. What we saw from Obama the past four years was the willingness to not just meet in the middle but almost bend over backwards for these stubborn idiots.

Tea Party Republicans at the core claim to firmly stand by the foundations this country was built on. This is a quote from Paul Ryan,

"Our founders made it really explicit. Our rights come from nature and God, and not from government,"

Now I'm not sure how much you guys learned about the Constitution, but our founding fathers explicitly condemned this exact idea left and right. I understand Obama hasn't produced the radical change he presented four years ago. But personally, I'll never be able to support a candidate who changes the ideas this country was built on in order to reduce God to someone who would support a political party over another. Because quite frankly, the Republican party thanks to Tea Baggers has been reduced to who can scream, "I love God" the loudest to get into office.

Didn't the democrats vote yesterday on using that same approach?

He keeps talking about lowering taxes for the middle class, who cares! I am glad the Republicans keep blocking this nonsense. There are already tons of IT, financial, medical, and engineering jobs that are not being filled now, and raising taxes on the middle class to create some jobs for those people living on the government's dime, would not bother me one bit. Power to the Big Red Elephant.

According to the Dems, If Romney being in office means that taxes will increase for the middle class, I could not care less. Money has to come from somewhere to create minimum wage and blue collar jobs.

Taxes don't create jobs in the private sector. Never have, never will. And Romney isn't gong to raise taxes on anyone. Once again the democrats are lying.