Online Now 3303

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2003
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3399
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Obamaphones sent to dead people

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    roflmao

    You are such a gullible toolbag.

    Girly emoticon - check
    Immature name calling - check
    Don't present any facts - check
    Tell me I'm wrong because I disagree with you but don't tell me why - check

    I guess I got all that I could reasonably expect from you.

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    Girly emoticon - check
    Immature name calling - check
    Don't present any facts - check
    Tell me I'm wrong because I disagree with you but don't tell me why - check

    I guess I got all that I could reasonably expect from you.

    dgoz already post an article that detailed the problem: lack of oversight and enforcement in allowing wireless cell phone companies in essentially trying to sign up as many as possible.

    Nah. I'm sure it was Obama trading free shit for votes because a lady in a YouTube video said so. Lol.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • azvalleybuckeye said...

    solid retort. headslap

    His "facts" are just too much for me. Sorry.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    dgoz already post an article that detailed the problem: lack of oversight and enforcement in allowing wireless cell phone companies in essentially trying to sign up as many as possible.

    Nah. I'm sure it was Obama trading free shit for votes because a lady in a YouTube video said so. Lol.

    You asked why people call them Obamaphones and I answered it.

    Nm, not arguing with you.

    This post was edited by justinboze on 3/12/2013 at 9:12 AM

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    You asked why people call them Obamaphones and I answered it.

    Nm, not arguing with you.

    Perpetuated by republicans and conservatives for partisanship gain as well. Very petty. Same with Obamacare.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • Looks like they should be called Reaganphones.

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    His "facts" are just too much for me. Sorry.

    If I was wrong and that is not why people call them Obamaphones then please tell me why I am wrong and what the correct reason is.

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    If I was wrong and that is not why people call them Obamaphones then please tell me why I am wrong and what the correct reason is.

    Does 2009 beat 2012?

    snopes.com: Free 'ObamaPhones' for Welfare Recipients

    An Obama administration program provides free cell phones and cellular service to welfare recipients?

    www.snopes.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • Obama is not responsible for the free phones. In fact, he will serve as President for 8 years without being responsible for a single negative thing.

    You start off with the woman not having to worry about putting gas in her car anymore
    Then in Detroit, you have them lined up for blocks for obama money. Where does the money come from? I don't know, guess it's Obama's
    Got an obama phone, go vote for him and get you one too.

    Absolutely pitiful

    VTSmitty

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Does 2009 beat 2012?

    I think most conservatives on this board get their information from Fox News and email forwards, which are one in the same.

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Perpetuated by republicans and conservatives for partisanship gain as well. Very petty. Same with Obamacare.

    I know that you can't go further into your explanation and give specifics without proving me correct so I figured that you would be as vague as possible to make sure you didn't post why/how it relates to Obama. Petty or not, the reasons that I gave are why they are called Obamaphones.

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    I know that you can't go further into your explanation and give specifics without proving me correct so I figured that you would be as vague as possible to make sure you didn't post why/how it relates to Obama. Petty or not, the reasons that I gave are why they are called Obamaphones.

    You mean like that Snopes page that proves a chain email wrong from 2009? Real vague and all.

    This post was edited by BamaLivesFootba on 3/12/2013 at 9:31 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • justinboze said...

    I know that you can't go further into your explanation and give specifics without proving me correct so I figured that you would be as vague as possible to make sure you didn't post why/how it relates to Obama. Petty or not, the reasons that I gave are why they are called Obamaphones.

    Problem under Obama, pick the start of the response

    Bush did.......
    Reagan was the first to.......
    George HW Bush..........
    The republicans.......
    Boehner is the one............

    Obama is responsible for absolutely nothing wrong that occurs in the 8 years he is in office.

    VTSmitty

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Does 2009 beat 2012?

    Not sure what you are asking, I didn't see anything in that article that compares 2009 to 2012 other than the huge balloon in the number of recipients up to 2012.

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    Not sure what you are asking, I didn't see anything in that article that compares 2009 to 2012 other than the huge balloon in the number of recipients up to 2012.

    You were trying to say that they are called Obamaphones because of the YouTube video. That's wrong.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    You were trying to say that they are called Obamaphones because of the YouTube video. That's wrong.

    Lmao. You are dense.

    signature image signature image

    Status

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    You mean like that Snopes page that proves a chain email wrong from 2009? Real vague and all.

    It didn't prove anything wrong that we were discussing. Most of the false claims were that it was a tax, not a fee passed on to consumers, even though the costs passed on are to avoid eating the costs that cell phone companies have to pay the Government. If you want to argue that gov't fees aren't taxes (like in Obamacare) several will disagree with you.

    Your argument was that Obama giving out free shit and a woman on a video bragging about it have nothing to do with why they are called Obama phones. Are you saying that the line at the bottom about using Obama's name to sell a product is why I am wrong?

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    It didn't prove anything wrong that we were discussing. Most of the false claims were that it was a tax, not a fee passed on to consumers, even though the costs passed on are to avoid eating the costs that cell phone companies have to pay the Government. If you want to argue that gov't fees aren't taxes (like in Obamacare) several will disagree with you.

    Your argument was that Obama giving out free shit and a woman on a video bragging about it have nothing to do with why they are called Obama phones. Are you saying that the line at the bottom about using Obama's name to sell a product is why I am wrong?

    You do know that Bush was the President that expanded the program to include cell phones, right? Yeah, you probably didn't.

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    You were trying to say that they are called Obamaphones because of the YouTube video. That's wrong.

    No, my reason was that the program tripled since he took office and the fraud amount in 2012 was more than the entire program amount when he took over. The video was an example of a woman bragging about getting a free phone and that everyone should support Obama because erbody in Cleveland got them.

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    Because the program tripled under his watch and goes along with his idea of buying votes with free shit. Also, there is a famous video of an Obama supporter acting a fool about it and how Obama got free phones for everyone in Cleveland so all the poor people should get out and support him.

    You mean not because of chain emails sent out in 2009 coining the phrase?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    You mean not because of chain emails sent out in 2009 coining the phrase?

    The guy that started the Obama phone bullshit has even admitted that he's full of shit.

    PolitiFact | Adam Putnam: Obama campaign gives free cell phones to supporters

    An A-team of Florida Republicans packed a Tampa stage Wednesday to welcome Mitt Romney and rally supporters in the final days of the presidential campaign. Former Gov. Jeb Bush and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio were in the lineup, as well as Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam, who warmed up the crowd and encouraged voters to head to the polls early. t just show up and cheer and slap a bumper sticker ...

    www.politifact.com
    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • justinboze said...

    No, my reason was that the program tripled since he took office and the fraud amount in 2012 was more than the entire program amount when he took over. The video was an example of a woman bragging about getting a free phone and that everyone should support Obama because erbody in Cleveland got them.

    Cool. I guess that can be your personal reason. Doesn't change the fact it is a perjorative started in 2009.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • Grand Slam said...

    You do know that Bush was the President that expanded the program to include cell phones, right? Yeah, you probably didn't.

    Nobody was arguing about the program initiation or that Clinton and Bush both expanded it. The point is that is has tripled since 2008, with 41% not be qualified. Even the articles about people mad about it are saying it won't be scrapped, but rather it needs to be monitored and stop allowing so many people to get free phones that are paid for by people with jobs.

    justinboze

  • justinboze said...

    Nobody was arguing about the program initiation or that Clinton and Bush both expanded it. The point is that is has tripled since 2008, with 41% not be qualified. Even the articles about people mad about it are saying it won't be scrapped, but rather it needs to be monitored and stop allowing so many people to get free phones that are paid for by people with jobs.

    Um, he expanded it in 2008 and now you're blaming Obama for the program growing. After Bush expanded it. Pretty stupid.

    signature image

    !!!

    Grand Slam

  • justinboze said...

    Nobody was arguing about the program initiation or that Clinton and Bush both expanded it. The point is that is has tripled since 2008, with 41% not be qualified. Even the articles about people mad about it are saying it won't be scrapped, but rather it needs to be monitored and stop allowing so many people to get free phones that are paid for by people with jobs.

    Did you read the article I posted?

    dgoz