Online Now 3680

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2417
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3666
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Of Hoke, Dantonio, and Meyer, who wins a natty...

  • Due51 said...

    You're not including the Better Homes & Garden National Championship, which contributes to Callahan's accounting of MSU national titles. Forget the fact that UPI used to vote on #1 BEFORE the team's even played their bowl game, as in 1965 when MSU went on to lose to UCLA.

    BUT DON'T EVER FORGET THAT1997 WAS SHARED!!!!lynchmob

    What part of mythical national championship do you think is hardest for people to grasp? Until we go at least 8 team playoff it's never going to be welcomed by everyone. Um in 97 had a fantastic team but having to play wsu kind of sucked the wind out of a great season. Not their fault, they did everything they were supposed to do. The voters screwed them because they had to follow arcane rules.

    Mythical champs are just that. It's who we think, not who proved it on the field.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags

  • with those options...urbs

    realistically.....bo pelini

    signature image signature image

    Husker14675

  • Husker14675 said...

    with those options...urbs

    realistically.....bo pelini

    It is possible in about 5 years. That should be enough time for Urbs to have a heart ache for his family and retire, allowing Pelini to coach at tOSU.

    Solid call.

    xxmgobluexx

  • Gfortress5 said...

    Oddly, I think they have hit their ceiling with ole BB

    I thought we were left off because it was assumed we'd win the title in the 2013-2014 campaign....

    signature image signature image signature image

    KPMBucky

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    It is possible in about 5 years. That should be enough time for Urbs to have a heart ache for his family and retire, allowing Pelini to coach at tOSU.

    Solid call.

    i just call em how i see em

    signature image signature image

    Husker14675

  • Husker14675 said...

    realistically.....bo pelini

    roflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmao

    dkerns

  • Meyer-55%
    Hoke-30%
    Dantonio-15%

    signature image

    SimplyComplex

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Dantonio winning an NC? Lulz that actually made me laugh.

    Miami Heat and Michigan Wolverines. Canada baby. lol

    OTPT

  • D.Wags said...

    Your "Coaches strategy" is to make the call at the line. Less than 6 in the box vs. the Michigan Spread and Denard will call a run. (If your linemen aren't getting off the line and downfield, you guys really suck) But, wait, you knew that, you know all the new techniques. I'm sorry if I'm going over every thing you already knew.

    If denard has seen a cover zeor he's also going to call run 60% of the time unless he sees something quick and a match up he likes and the ball is going to be out in about 2 seconds. If it's cover 1 with man under or one extra man deep, he's 50/50 at calling a run at the line of scrimage. If it's cove 2 or more, he's 70% or greater looking to pass first, but I've went through his prgressions in the other thread, and what the heck, you know all this stuff. Just old crap, from an old dog.

    On your running plays, I've actually seen you guys option a tackle and block an end which Oregon has done,but you guys did some last year. On your speed options your linemen are releasing right now and looking at Linebackers and you guys are just saying screw the linemen, we aint blocking them. (if you are saying that they don't release because they're waiting for Denard to get over the LOS before they go to the LB's, well, you and I are watching different games.) If you want to talk about calls during the play when you guys slide protect with that whole "run pass" option you guys were talking about, well, we'll have to go into the techniques your guys are first using in slide protection. Aiming high above the thigh to keep defenders hands down, and listening for any go calls during the play.

    I'd love to talk any blocking schemes you want, as you are up on all the latest techniques, and this is actually the first year I didn't have time or a buddy who wanted to go to any football clinics. I'm old, and I fit into that category of "Old dog, hard to teach new things to". I'm not as qualified in any of the techniques and schemes as you are, and I'd love to learn from you. I've only picked up a couple things from watching Denard and Michigan on film, and talking to some people whose job it is to break that stuff down. They do it for a living, but aren't as informed as you, so I'd love to learn from you. (actually that's sarcasm, but if you really do have an inside to what Denard looks for or what your coaches have him calling, I'd love to hear it, just because that's the fun part of football for me)

    Help an old dog out.

    You know too much football to not understand that the blocking schemes are different in a zone read spread offense than a pro set. In a pro set, the decision whether to run or pass is made before the snap. A zone read offense is different. In a zone read, the decision about what to do with the ball generally is made after the snap. Sometimes the decision is simply whether the QB is going to hand off the ball to a RB or keep it himself, but many other plays are designed with run/pass or even run/run/pass options giving the QB the option to keep the ball, hand the ball off or throw the ball. And the QB makes that decision after the ball is snapped, not before. It is not power football out of the I and you don't block it the same way.

    This post was edited by MrWoodson on 6/5/2012 at 12:14 PM

    MrWoodson

  • Well, Michigan has never won a national championship as determined by the Coaches so they are out. MSU isn't likely, either. Sadly, I'm going to go with Meyer and tOSU.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • Correct Answer: Hoke, Meyer and Dantonio all win the same year.

    First, Dantonio makes a lateral move from MSU HC back to OSU DC under Meyer
    Both OSU and UM go undefeated until the game, where UM wins one point.
    They both win their divisions and OSU wins easily by two scores in the CCG
    The new system is a 4 team playoff with the 3 highest ranked Conference Champs and 1 best available(Michigan)
    Both teams win their 1st round game and advance to the NC game
    The teams play an unholy 3rd game, where Michigan wins by a last second FG
    Michigan wins the Playoff Championship(Coaches Poll?), but OSU is declared the NC by the AP Poll for their beatdown of Michigan in the B1G CC and their huge win over a tougher opponent in the first playoff game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "The Michigan Man is certain he invented the Big Ten, along with intellect, cocktails and sex."

    Wendel Clark

  • Giant Moose said...

    Well, Michigan has never won a national championship as determined by the Coaches so they are out. MSU isn't likely, either. Sadly, I'm going to go with Meyer and tOSU.

    What does Michigan having not won one in the past have anything to do with the future?

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    What does Michigan having not won one in the past have anything to do with the future?

    The fact that a Michigan fan said this, +1!!!!!!!!!

    OTPT

  • MrWoodson said...

    You know too much football to not understand that the blocking schemes are different in a zone read spread offense than a pro set. In a pro set, the decision whether to run or pass is made before the snap. A zone read offense is different. In a zone read, the decision about what to do with the ball generally is made after the snap. Sometimes the decision is simply whether the QB is going to hand off the ball to a RB or keep it himself, but many other plays are designed with run/pass or even run/run/pass options giving the QB the option to keep the ball, hand the ball off or throw the ball. And the QB makes that decision after the ball is snapped, not before. It is not power football out of the I and you don't block it the same way.

    Wait, so your WRs have to make reads as to whether they're supposed to blocking their guys down field for a running play, or actually running passing routes for a passing play? Stop and think about how that'd work. Do they sit at the LOS, wait to look at Denard and see if he's going back to pass, and THEN start running routes?

    Sorry dude, but you're completely talking out of your rear on this one.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Wait, so your WRs have to make reads as to whether they're supposed to blocking their guys down field for a running play, or actually running passing routes for a passing play? Stop and think about how that'd work. Do they sit at the LOS, wait to look at Denard and see if he's going back to pass, and THEN start running routes?

    Sorry dude, but you're completely talking out of your rear on this one.

    I was under the impression that the WR ran their routes anyway.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    What does Michigan having not won one in the past have anything to do with the future?

    Anything is possible, you are right. But the coaches have never thought Michigan was the best team. If it is close among three teams, the Wolverines might be left out of the national championship game because the Coaches' Poll has Michigan lower.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • OTPT said...

    The fact that a Michigan fan said this, +1!!!!!!!!!

    I just don't see the point in using stuff that did or didn't happen 20 years ago to predict future results. Both fanbases do this, it's just that MSU's fanbase is using more recent history.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Giant Moose said...

    Anything is possible, you are right. But the coaches have never thought Michigan was the best team. If it is close among three teams, the Wolverines might be left out of the national championship game because the Coaches' Poll has Michigan lower.

    And how can you guarantee that the Coaches Poll will have Michigan lower? Past results do not always predict future events.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    I just don't see the point in using stuff that did or didn't happen 20 years ago to predict future results. Both fanbases do this, it's just that MSU's fanbase is using more recent history.

    I think the coaches do not like Michigan. Honestly, I would be worried about that if I were a Michigan fan since there is a human element to who makes the national championship game.

    I am not pretending that MSU is going to win it, either. Sure, MSU has had a nice run and it is great to finally have awoken from our long slumber, but it will take a lot for the Spartans to be in this discussion as well.

    Only Ohio State and Meyer have a realistic shot until MSU and UM prove otherwise.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Wait, so your WRs have to make reads as to whether they're supposed to blocking their guys down field for a running play, or actually running passing routes for a passing play? Stop and think about how that'd work. Do they sit at the LOS, wait to look at Denard and see if he's going back to pass, and THEN start running routes?

    Sorry dude, but you're completely talking out of your rear on this one.

    No that's not how it works. For example, Michigan has a play where the slot receiver runs straight up the seem. Denard reads either the LB or Safety, depending on the defense, and if the slot WR is open he throws to him if not he runs. So, Denard is optioning off the LB or S while the WR runs his route.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Wait, so your WRs have to make reads as to whether they're supposed to blocking their guys down field for a running play, or actually running passing routes for a passing play? Stop and think about how that'd work. Do they sit at the LOS, wait to look at Denard and see if he's going back to pass, and THEN start running routes?

    Sorry dude, but you're completely talking out of your rear on this one.

    This video popped up a couple of weeks ago. Go to the 1:25 mark.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfYwSjLAUG0

    It is a zone read to Toussaint. The WRs are running routes and when they look back they see that the read went to Toussaint and they turn to block. Similar play happens a couple of times later in the video.

    I don't know if this is what he was talking about, but it sounded similar.

    xxmgobluexx

  • WillyWolverine said...

    No that's not how it works. For example, Michigan has a play where the slot receiver runs straight up the seem. Denard reads either the LB or Safety, depending on the defense, and if the slot WR is open he throws to him if not he runs. So, Denard is optioning off the LB or S while the WR runs his route.

    So the default is that the WRs run their route, then look back to see if it's a run, then start blocking?

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    So the default is that the WRs run their route, then look back to see if it's a run, then start blocking?

    Not a default, it is a called play.

    xxmgobluexx

  • Giant Moose said...

    I think the coaches do not like Michigan. Honestly, I would be worried about that if I were a Michigan fan since there is a human element to who makes the national championship game.

    I am not pretending that MSU is going to win it, either. Sure, MSU has had a nice run and it is great to finally have awoken from our long slumber, but it will take a lot for the Spartans to be in this discussion as well.

    Only Ohio State and Meyer have a realistic shot until MSU and UM prove otherwise.

    If Michigan ever goes undefeated in the B1G and their non-conference schedule, they will be in the National Championship Game, unless it is a playoff by then. Also, if the coaches don't like Michigan, and that hurts their ranking, why would Michigan have been ranked high enough for the Sugar Bowl? Michigan's name would be strong enough to get into the MNC just like the Sugar Bowl.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    This video popped up a couple of weeks ago. Go to the 1:25 mark.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfYwSjLAUG0

    It is a zone read to Toussaint. The WRs are running routes and when they look back they see that the read went to Toussaint and they turn to block. Similar play happens a couple of times later in the video.

    I don't know if this is what he was talking about, but it sounded similar.

    All while blocking no one downfield. The point is that your WRs can't effectively block down field for a running play and also run routes; if those WRs were run-blocking, Toussaint has a great shot at a TD. You can certainly run a running play out of a passing formation; a draw play is essentially a play-action run for that reason.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky