Online Now 3276

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2204
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3188
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Of Hoke, Dantonio, and Meyer, who wins a natty...

  • Giant Moose said...

    I think the coaches do not like Michigan. Honestly, I would be worried about that if I were a Michigan fan since there is a human element to who makes the national championship game.

    I am not pretending that MSU is going to win it, either. Sure, MSU has had a nice run and it is great to finally have awoken from our long slumber, but it will take a lot for the Spartans to be in this discussion as well.

    Only Ohio State and Meyer have a realistic shot until MSU and UM prove otherwise.

    Since the coaches poll wasn't established until 1950, your "stat" doesn't carry a whole lot of weight. The only time it was relevant for Michigan was 97.

    One year sample size seems a little flimsy.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • SpartanRocky said...

    All while blocking no one downfield. The point is that your WRs can't effectively block down field for a running play and also run routes; if those WRs were run-blocking, Toussaint has a great shot at a TD. You can certainly run a running play out of a passing formation; a draw play is essentially a play-action run for that reason.

    And what are the DB reads on that play, the QB/RB exchange or the WRs?

    Pretty nice gain there. If they try and jump the run to prevent giving up more than they already did, the WRs are open for Denard to fake the handoff and to throw to.

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    And what are the DB reads on that play, the QB/RB exchange or the WRs?

    Pretty nice gain there. If they try and jump the run to prevent giving up more than they already did, the WRs are open for Denard to fake the handoff and to throw to.

    Exactly. It's not a straight run play. It's a post snap read for the QB.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    If Michigan ever goes undefeated in the B1G and their non-conference schedule, they will be in the National Championship Game, unless it is a playoff by then. Also, if the coaches don't like Michigan, and that hurts their ranking, why would Michigan have been ranked high enough for the Sugar Bowl? Michigan's name would be strong enough to get into the MNC just like the Sugar Bowl.

    Perhaps. I would like to think an undefeated Big Ten team like Michigan would make it to the NCG, but you have to think an SEC team would automatically be there no matter what. And then if Michigan is up against an undefeated USC or undefeated Texas, who would get the nod?

    It could get interesting, and historically, when determining who is among the elite of the elite, for some reason the coaches have snubbed the Wolverines. Plus with the Big Ten's reputation being lower than in the past, I could see how Michigan could be on the outside looking in when three teams are in the conversation.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • Giant Moose said...

    Perhaps. I would like to think an undefeated Big Ten team like Michigan would make it to the NCG, but you have to think an SEC team would automatically be there no matter what. And then if Michigan is up against an undefeated USC or undefeated Texas, who would get the nod?

    It could get interesting, and historically, when determining who is among the elite of the elite, for some reason the coaches have snubbed the Wolverines. Plus with the Big Ten's reputation being lower than in the past, I could see how Michigan could be on the outside looking in when three teams are in the conversation.

    I'd think it'd depend on SOS. If UM runs the table in 2012, they should be in the NC game.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Due51 said...

    Since the coaches poll wasn't established until 1950, your "stat" doesn't carry a whole lot of weight. The only time it was relevant for Michigan was 97.

    One year sample size seems a little flimsy.

    It is not my stat. I don't determine who is the national champion. I put the most weight into what the coaches' think though because they actually are involved in the game. Also, anything before 1950, you have to admit wasn't really the same game as it is today for several reasons.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I'd think it'd depend on SOS. If UM runs the table in 2012, they should be in the NC game.

    And how each conference is thought of. People need to remember just a few years ago an undeated Auburn SEC team was left out of the BCS title game.

    This post was edited by WillyWolverine on 6/5/2012 at 1:31 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • Giant Moose said...

    It is not my stat. I don't determine who is the national champion. I put the most weight into what the coaches' think though because they actually are involved in the game. Also, anything before 1950, you have to admit wasn't really the same game as it is today for several reasons.

    That stat doesn't prove anything though. You claim that historically the coaches have snubbed Michigan, you have one case to prove your point. That doesn't guarantee that the coaches will snub them again this year. Besides, I doubt that an undefeated Big 12 team would go over an undefeated B1G team.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Giant Moose said...

    Perhaps. I would like to think an undefeated Big Ten team like Michigan would make it to the NCG, but you have to think an SEC team would automatically be there no matter what. And then if Michigan is up against an undefeated USC or undefeated Texas, who would get the nod?

    It could get interesting, and historically, when determining who is among the elite of the elite, for some reason the coaches have snubbed the Wolverines. Plus with the Big Ten's reputation being lower than in the past, I could see how Michigan could be on the outside looking in when three teams are in the conversation.

    For (ehh) TTun to run the table, they'd have to beat Bama. That along with an undefeated record will get you into the championship game. Who's Texas or USC going to beat that's the caliber of Bama?

    dkerns

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    That stat doesn't prove anything though. You claim that historically the coaches have snubbed Michigan, you have one case to prove your point. That doesn't guarantee that the coaches will snub them again this year. Besides, I doubt that an undefeated Big 12 team would go over an undefeated B1G team.

    Well isn't one very high-profile proven case more than your argument has? Honestly, none of us have any idea what will happen. It is all speculative.

    The question was about Michigan, MSU and Ohio State. Given Michigan's and MSU's lack of high-profile success in the modern era, I just gave my opinion that I see neither Hoke or Dantonio getting it done before Ohio State and Meyer.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • Giant Moose said...

    Well isn't one very high-profile proven case more than your argument has? Honestly, none of us have any idea what will happen. It is all speculative.

    The question was about Michigan, MSU and Ohio State. Given Michigan's and MSU's lack of high-profile success in the modern era, I just gave my opinion that I see neither Hoke or Dantonio getting it done before Ohio State and Meyer.

    That's just it though, you made the claim, you have to prove it. Not me. Basic debate skills.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Wait, so your WRs have to make reads as to whether they're supposed to blocking their guys down field for a running play, or actually running passing routes for a passing play? Stop and think about how that'd work. Do they sit at the LOS, wait to look at Denard and see if he's going back to pass, and THEN start running routes?

    Sorry dude, but you're completely talking out of your rear on this one.

    No. The pass option generally is to one designated receiver just like the handoff option is to one RB. Go to smart football and read up on the spread. Or go to youtube and watch some of RR's videos where he breaks down the offense. Is this really new to you? I guess maybe us Michigan fans take it for granted at this point because we had to learn it all when RR came to town, but I'm a bit surprised that the more knowledgeable guys like you and DWags don't understand how the spread works.

    MrWoodson

  • MrWoodson said...

    No. The pass option generally is to one designated receiver just like the handoff option is to one RB. Go to smart football and read up on the spread. Or go to youtube and watch some of RR's videos where he breaks down the offense. Is this really new to you? I guess maybe us Michigan fans take it for granted at this point because we had to learn it all when RR came to town, but I'm a bit surprised that the more knowledgeable guys like you and DWags don't understand how the spread works.

    Smartfootball had some great breakdowns on it.

    xxmgobluexx

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    That's just it though, you made the claim, you have to prove it. Not me. Basic debate skills.

    I claimed that the coaches have historically not chosen Michigan as the national champion. That has been proven.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • SpartanRocky said...

    All while blocking no one downfield. The point is that your WRs can't effectively block down field for a running play and also run routes; if those WRs were run-blocking, Toussaint has a great shot at a TD. You can certainly run a running play out of a passing formation; a draw play is essentially a play-action run for that reason.

    Like DWags, you are stuck on pro style. Each WR blocks his man downfield. It's not a traditional pass play with a series of checkdowns. Think of it more like a hot route. Most of the WRs are decoys and blockers. One WR is the pass option. Denard can hand the ball to the RB or keep it and either run or pass to the designated receiver if he's open.

    MrWoodson

  • Giant Moose said...

    I claimed that the coaches have historically not chosen Michigan as the national champion. That has been proven.

    No it hasn't. It happened once and you can not prove for certain that there were no other variables involved that kept Michigan from being number 1. One case does not make a rule, it can just as easily be an exception.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Giant Moose said...

    I claimed that the coaches have historically not chosen Michigan as the national champion. That has been proven.

    The coaches have historically not chosen Wake Forest as the national champion either...Besides shouldn't we be using the more reliable methods of choosing a national championship like the Dunkel Index or Boand system which allowed MSU to claims NCs for teams that failed to even win the Big Ten?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "The Michigan Man is certain he invented the Big Ten, along with intellect, cocktails and sex."

    Wendel Clark

  • Wendel Clark said...

    The coaches have historically not chosen Wake Forest as the national champion either...Besides shouldn't we be using the more reliable methods of choosing a national championship like the Dunkel Index or Boand system which allowed MSU to claims NCs for teams that failed to even win the Big Ten?

    I once saw a squirrel fall 3 stories and survive. Therefore, squirrels historically survive 30 foot falls.

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Wendel Clark said...

    The coaches have historically not chosen Wake Forest as the national champion either..

    Yes, and if you were to ask me if Wake Forest, Michigan or Ohio State would get a coaches' national championship next, I would say Ohio State because Wake Forest and Michigan never have gotten it done. shrug

    This post was edited by Giant Moose on 6/5/2012 at 1:59 PM

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • Giant Moose said...

    Yes, and if you were to ask me if Wake Forest, Michigan or Ohio State would get a coaches' national championship next, I would say Ohio State because Wake Forest and Michigan never have gotten it done. shrug

    If all 3 went undefeated it would depend on who had the tougher schedule, not on who had done it before. Also the preseason rankings come into play more often than not.

    This post was edited by Never Lose Hoke on 6/5/2012 at 2:03 PM

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Giant Moose said...

    Yes, and if you were to ask me if Wake Forest, Michigan or Ohio State would get a coaches' national championship next, I would say Ohio State because Wake Forest and Michigan never have gotten it done. shrug

    The LA Kings have never won the Stanley Cup, the New Jersey Devils have, I would say NJD will win one next because LAK have never gotten it done.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "The Michigan Man is certain he invented the Big Ten, along with intellect, cocktails and sex."

    Wendel Clark

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    It would depend on who had the tougher schedule, not on who had done it before.

    My opinion is that past successful programs and coaches are more likely to win than those who have not been successful in the past.

    Therefore, that's why I think Ohio State and Meyer are most likely to win a title next. I don't why that is so difficult for you to grasp.

    signature image

    Giant Moose

  • This is all moot because UM is going to win in 2013 and 2015. We are going to win two before anyone in the B10 wins one.

    goblue

    MrWoodson

  • Giant Moose said...

    My opinion is that past successful programs and coaches are more likely to win than those who have not been successful in the past.

    Therefore, that's why I think Ohio State and Meyer are most likely to win a title next. I don't why that is so difficult for you to grasp.

    I understand your argument. I just think that it is ridiculous. By your argument Michigan should be dominating MSU, why aren't they?

    signature image signature image

    This is Michigan, fergodsakes.

    Never Lose Hoke

  • Never Lose Hoke said...

    I once saw a squirrel fall 3 stories and survive. Therefore, squirrels historically survive 30 foot falls.

    Historically MSU has never been to a BCS Bowl. Therefore they have a 0% chance of ever making one, which is required to play in the national championship game.

    I guess I need to change my earlier call on MSUs chances from a 1% to 0%.

    xxmgobluexx