Online Now 3131

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2483
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3268
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Oregon Offense < Clemson Offense

  • ifinnen said...

    Nova pounces on the opportunity to take a shot at Oregon before the clueless west coasters wake up and bomb this thread...perfectly executed

    now lock this thread...before mjruffalo and keep on ducking attack with their typical drivel

    Problem is that KOD is a Baltimoron. If Nova is in fact in Nova that concerns me a bit. I mean he's already given detailed instructions on how he would like Nova kill himself in another thread. One more Oregon is < than post and KOD might take matters into his own hands...

    brem22 ●

  • cuznchips28 said...

    Couldn't agree more, and everyone knows nova and I don't agree on anything. Clemson NFL talent severely outweighs Oregons, all you need to know

    The difference between you and Nova is a question better left to neuroscience. But I do have my suspicions... and it makes me sad to think you were never really given a fair chance

    attachment

    brem22 ●

  • Clemson said...

    Boyd does have the tendency to make some very elementary mistakes when he sees a lot of pressure. When he has time, his deep ball is probably better than anyone's in the country.

    translation......^^^^^.....hellova flag football QB or when playing tackle football vs ball st, wake,bc, maryland... ad nauseum

    signature image

    BritBrant

  • Lol Clemson sucks so hard. They might score 20 against South Carolina.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre ●

  • CptAUmerica21 said...

    Clemson, they can be physical when they have to be.

    Clemson? Physical?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre ●

  • Must suck having to resort to trolling on here because your overrated team can't get through the easiest conference in the nation.

    wig ●

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Discuss

    Im taking Clemson

    Andre Ellington is a better NFL prospect than Barner

    The top WR for Oregon has barely 300 yards ( The Black Mamba )

    Clemson has two players over 500 yards and one in Hopkins who is already over 1000 and has 13 TD's ( the top 3 for Oregon only have 12 TD's combined..... 3 players..... still not as many as Hopkins )

    I also think we can all agree Watkins numbers would be better had he not missed 2 games

    So WR is just hands down in Clemson's favor, I mean there really is no discussion when you factor in the rest of Clemson's core on top of those 2 ( 5 star Charone Peake and 4 star Martavis Bryant )

    TE is close but Ford has more yards, TD's by 1 and catches.... than Lyeria..... its close, but Clemson has the edge clearly and Ford is a good one

    QB is also close, but Boyd leads in yards but nearly a 1000.... yes, a thousand..... and TD's while Mario'ta has the edge in less INT's by 4 and completion percentage, barely ( 70% to 67% )

    And I think the biggest difference, is Clemson proved it can put up points on a very good defense

    Oregon has not yet done this

    Im taking Clemson all day, the NFL talent is way more scary than a bunch of midgets out running terrible defense

    Ya we get it you hate Oregon, moving on. I'll take Mariota all day over Boyd.

    This post was edited by OCanada on 11/5/2012 at 6:42 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    "I ponder the endlessness of the stars" - The Tragically Hip, Fully Completely

    OCanada ●

  • OCanada said...

    Ya we get it you hate Oregon, moving on. I'll take Mariota all day over Boyd.

    Or any qb on FSU's roster.

    ducklefty ●

  • BritBrant said...

    translation......^^^^^.....hellova flag football QB or when playing tackle football vs ball st, wake,bc, maryland... ad nauseum

    Boyd is better than any SCAR QB in the last 2 decades, maybe history.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Clemson

  • Clemson said...

    Boyd is better than any SCAR QB in the last 2 decades, maybe history.

    moon

    South Carolina vs Clemson 2011

    Like: http://www.facebook.com/justinkingmedia ----- Follow: https://twitter.com/#!/JustinKing224 ---- Click to tweet: http://clicktotweet.com/l8aUa The Unive...

    youtu.be

    #15 Clemson vs #23 West Virginia 2011-2012 Orange Bowl Part 1

    This is a telecast, broadcast, and production of ESPN. We do not claim ownership of any kind therefore we do not profit from it in any way. COPYRIGHT DISCLAI...

    youtu.be

    #7 Clemson vs. NC State - November 19, 2011

    #7 Clemson comes into Carter-Finley, attempting to move up in the BCS, and meets a brick wall. Sorry about missing the first two touchdowns, forgot to set th...

    youtu.be
    signature image

    BritBrant

  • ducklefty said...

    Or any qb on FSU's roster.

    yeah who wouldn't want 3 NFL qbs over so track athlete playing qb

    cuznchips28 ●

  • wig said...

    Must suck having to resort to trolling on here because your overrated team can't get through the easiest conference in the nation.

    Yeah having the ACC's best record proves that

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • OCanada said...

    Ya we get it you hate Oregon, moving on. I'll take Mariota all day over Boyd.

    Nobody in the NFL would, and Im taking Watkins, Ellington, and Hopkins over anybody on ORegon's roster all day

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Nobody in the NFL would, and Im taking Watkins, Ellington, and Hopkins over anybody on ORegon's roster all day

    You don't honestly believe that Clemson's offense is better than Oregon's. Not sure why you try and troll this.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • MJRuffalo said...

    You don't honestly believe that Clemson's offense is better than Oregon's. Not sure why you try and troll this.

    I do actually, more balanced and more talent = better

    Of course you don't believe it, you are incredibly biased to all things PAc 12

    Clemson also scored 37 on a top 5 defense, Oregon has done nothing like this considering they haven't even played a top 10 defense yet

    This post was edited by NoVaNoles on 11/5/2012 at 8:06 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    I do actually, more balanced and more talent = better

    Of course you don't believe it, you are incredibly biased to all things PAc 12

    I could agree that at certain positions Clemson has more talent, but as an overall offensive group Oregon is so far ahead of Clemson. Oregon is averaging almost as many points in the first half as Clemson is for the entire game, and Oregon has played a strong SOS.

    Of course Stats don't tell the full story, but in this case it is simply the truth.

    Now you put Chip Kelly in charge of Clemson, and I am sure their offensive production would skyrocket.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • Oregon will face the #1 overall rush defense, and #12 scoring defense in a couple of weeks. We will all see then.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • MJRuffalo said...

    I could agree that at certain positions Clemson has more talent, but as an overall offensive group Oregon is so far ahead of Clemson. Oregon is averaging almost as many points in the first half as Clemson is for the entire game, and Oregon has played a strong SOS.

    Of course Stats don't tell the full story, but in this case it is simply the truth.

    Now you put Chip Kelly in charge of Clemson, and I am sure their offensive production would skyrocket.

    Chad Morris is just as effective a play caller

    Don't tell the whole story ? but in this case it is simply the truth..... hmmmm, how convenient for you lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Chad Morris is just as effective a play caller

    Don't tell the whole story ? but in this case it is simply the truth..... hmmmm, how convenient for you lol

    higher rated stats vs a tougher schedule, and have pulled their starters much more often. I mean everything points to Oregon has having, not just a better, but a much, much better offense. There is nothing tangible that would suggest otherwise.

    For example BYU has the #4 rated defense, but one could certainly argue that they don't have the 4th best defense in the country based on who they have played. (though they have still played a stronger SOS than FSUe)

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • MJRuffalo said...

    higher rated stats vs a tougher schedule, and have pulled their starters much more often. I mean everything points to Oregon has having, not just a better, but a much, much better offense. There is nothing tangible that would suggest otherwise.

    For example BYU has the #4 rated defense, but one could certainly argue that they don't have the 4th best defense in the country based on who they have played. (though they have still played a stronger SOS than FSUe)

    Except for all the stats I posted

    And SOS doesn't judge defenses, its judges teams

    That is stupid when discussing offenses

    And lolz at bringing up FSU's SOS, irrelevant to this discussion

    BYU ? jesus man, GFY

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Yeah having the ACC's best record proves that

    Congrats on being the smartest retard, I guess, which is exactly what winning the ACC equates to. By getting through I meant unscathed and actually competing for something more than an Orange Bowl against the Big East.

    wig ●

  • NoVaNoles said...

    Except for all the stats I posted

    And SOS doesn't judge defenses, its judges teams

    That is stupid when discussing offenses

    And lolz at bringing up FSU's SOS, irrelevant to this discussion

    BYU ? jesus man, GFY

    Funny that none of the stats you posted included total points or total offense. Annnndddd done.

    wig ●

  • what stats? Oregon has a better scoring offense, better total offense, higher percentage of TD's to red zone possessions, better rush offense, a higher average yards per play. The only meaningful stats the Clemson is better is in turnovers lost, Passing offense, and pass efficiency.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • wig said...

    Funny that none of the stats you posted included total points or total offense. Annnndddd done.

    You haven't played any good defenses, and lolz at going unscathed in conference play

    Something Oregon has done in the Pac 12 just once in their history

    FSU has done it 8 times

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • wig said...

    Congrats on being the smartest retard, I guess, which is exactly what winning the ACC equates to. By getting through I meant unscathed and actually competing for something more than an Orange Bowl against the Big East.

    You mean like big bad Oregon has done once, and lost to the weakest BCS champ of all time ?

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports